メニュー
Score the mathematical soundness of a given theory based on its existing falsification reports.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Design and propose the next step: either a regular data-gathering experiment, literature search, or a concrete solution candidate.
Determine the type of proposal given, execute/delegate accordingly, and return the appropriate resulting ID (experiment ID, literature search ID, or solution ID).
Score and rank solution candidates relative to the research goal, and update parent theory scores.
Integrate recent interpretations from the interpretation log into the associated theory.
Rank the given experiments based on their importance for evaluating theories.
Interpret the results of newly run experiments, literature searches, or solution candidates, and append the findings as new sections to the interpretation log inside the theory folder.
| name | score-soundness |
| description | Score the mathematical soundness of a given theory based on its existing falsification reports. |
| argument-hint | the theory ID to score (e.g. T_20260414_143100_d4e5f6) |
| user-invocable | false |
Your task is to assess the mathematical soundness of a given theory based on its existing falsification reports.
theory.md file to understand the theory that you are scoring.review.md files for each falsification review.review.md file will contain a section ## Target Hypothesis that describes which statement within the theory is being evaluated, and a ## Conclusion section which summarizes whether or not the statement was indeed falsified. Read these sections first to understand whether any falsifications were found. You should then read the rest of the review as needed, in order to understand whether the falsification was mathematical or empirical in nature (and disregard it if it is only empirical or experimental).