to-prd

name	to-prd
description	Extract a focused PRD (Product Requirements Document) — the product-facing what & why — from a spec or plan. Use when the user wants a PRD, product framing, goals and success metrics, or says /to-prd, or when another skill offers to produce one.
allowed-tools	Bash(git config:*), Bash(date:*), Glob, Read, Write

To PRD

Frame a feature for a product/stakeholder audience: the problem, the goals, who it serves, how success is measured. A PRD is smaller and more focused than a spec — it sources from the spec and does not restate it. Keep the how out; that lives in to-adr and the plan.

Offered by architect after the spec; also runs standalone.

Input

1. Path given as an argument → use it.
2. Invoked from another skill that passes a path → use that.
3. Otherwise → most recently modified spec in docs/specifications/, else plan in docs/plans/; if ambiguous, ask which.

Read the source in full before extracting.

Value gate

Produce a PRD only when there is a product surface with goals worth framing independently of what the spec already says — measurable goals, success metrics, audience, non-goals. Internal refactors, tooling, and documentation work have no such surface.

If a PRD would merely paraphrase the spec's Problem/Solution/User Stories, produce nothing: say so and stop. The PRD earns its place only by adding framing the spec lacks.

[!NOTE] Direct /to-prd invocation lowers the bar: honour a borderline case the user explicitly asked for, skipping only an all-placeholder result.

Write the PRD

One file at docs/prd/<yyyy-mm-dd>-<slug>.md. Date from date +%F, author from git config user.name.

# {Product / Feature Name} — PRD

- **Status**: Draft
- **Author**: {git config user.name}
- **Created**: {YYYY-MM-DD}

## Overview

{Problem and proposed solution in one paragraph —
implementation-agnostic.}

## Background & Problem

{Why this matters now. Who is affected and how.}

## Goals

- {Measurable goal}

## Non-Goals

- {Explicitly out of scope}

## Users & Use Cases

{Who uses this and the scenarios they need it for.}

## Requirements

### Functional

- {What the system must do — user-observable behaviour.}

### Non-Functional

- {Performance, security, reliability, compliance constraints.}

## Success Metrics

- {How success is measured.}

## Open Questions

- {Unresolved decisions or risks.}

## References

- Source: [{spec or plan name}](../specifications/{filename}.md)

Report

List the file created with its path.

Guidelines

• Extract; do not invent. Every statement traces to the source. Missing input for a section → write _Not specified in source._, never fabricate.
• Stay implementation-agnostic — push the how into ADRs and the plan.
• Follow conventions-markdown and omit needless words — see ../shared/CONCISE-PROSE.md.