integrated-reasoning-v2

# Integrated Reasoning v2 (IR-v2) Meta-orchestration guide for choosing optimal reasoning patterns. Analyzes problem characteristics and recommends which cognitive methodology to use. ## When to Use Invoke when facing complex problems and unsure which reasoning approach fits best. IR-v2 scores 11 dimensions and selects the optimal pattern. ## Available Patterns | Pattern | Best For | Key Strength | |---------|----------|--------------| | **ToT** (Tree of Thoughts) | Find THE best among known options | Systematic evaluation | | **BoT** (Breadth of Thought) | Explore ALL possible approaches | Exhaustive coverage | | **SRC** (Self-Reflecting Chain) | Step-by-step with validation | Error correction | | **HE** (Hypothesis-Elimination) | Find root CAUSE of issues | Diagnostic precision | | **AR** (Adversarial Reasoning) | Stress-test solutions | Robustness validation | | **DR** (Dialectical Reasoning) | Synthesize opposing views | Trade-off resolution | | **AT** (Analogical Transfer) | Novel problems, no precedent | Creative solutions | | **RTR** (Rapid Triage Reasoning) | Time-critical decisions | Speed optimization | | **NDF** (Negotiated Decision Framework) | Multi-stakeholder alignment | Consensus building | ## Quick Selection Guide ``` "I need the BEST option" → ToT "I need ALL options" → BoT "I need to trace step by step" → SRC "I need to find THE CAUSE" → HE "I need to VALIDATE a solution" → AR "I'm stuck between two approaches" → DR "This is completely novel" → AT "I need to decide NOW" → RTR "Multiple stakeholders must agree" → NDF ``` ## Dimension Scoring (0-5) Before selecting a pattern, score these dimensions: 1. **Sequential Dependencies** - Do steps depend on previous results? 2. **Criteria Clarity** - How clear are success criteria? 3. **Solution Space Known** - Are possible solutions well-defined? 4. **Single Answer Needed** - Is one best answer required? 5. **Evidence Available** - Can hypotheses be tested? 6. **Opposing Valid Views** - Are there legitimate tensions? 7. **Problem Novelty** - How unprecedented is this? 8. **Robustness Required** - Must solution withstand attack? 9. **Solution Exists** - Is there already a proposed solution? 10. **Time Pressure** - How urgent is the decision? 11. **Stakeholder Complexity** - How many parties must agree? ## Pattern Affinity Formulas ``` ToT = (CriteriaClarity × 0.35) + (SingleAnswer × 0.30) + (SolutionSpaceKnown × 0.20) + (SequentialDeps × 0.15) BoT = (1-SingleAnswer × 0.35) + (ProblemNovelty × 0.30) + (1-CriteriaClarity × 0.20) + (SequentialDeps × 0.15) SRC = (SequentialDeps × 0.45) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.25) + (EvidenceAvailable × 0.20) + (RobustnessRequired × 0.10) HE = (EvidenceAvailable × 0.40) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.30) + (SequentialDeps × 0.20) + (RobustnessRequired × 0.10) AR = SolutionExists >= 3 ? (RobustnessRequired × 0.45) + (EvidenceAvailable × 0.25) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.20) + (1-TimePressure × 0.10) : 0 DR = (OpposingValidViews × 0.50) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.20) + (1-SingleAnswer × 0.15) + (1-TimePressure × 0.15) AT = (ProblemNovelty × 0.45) + (1-SolutionSpaceKnown × 0.30) + (1-CriteriaClarity × 0.15) + (EvidenceAvailable × 0.10) RTR = (TimePressure × 0.50) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.25) + (RobustnessRequired × 0.15) + (SequentialDeps × 0.10) NDF = StakeholderComplexity >= 3 ? (StakeholderComplexity × 0.50) + (OpposingValidViews × 0.25) + (1-TimePressure × 0.15) + (CriteriaClarity × 0.10) : 0 ``` ## Parallel Execution When top 2 patterns score within 0.3 of each other: 1. Run both patterns in parallel 2. Compare outputs for agreement/disagreement 3. Use consensus or vote to determine final answer 4. Calibrate confidence based on agreement level ## Usage Example ``` User: "Should we use microservices or monolith for our new app?" IR-v2 Analysis: - Sequential Dependencies: 2 (independent evaluation) - Criteria Clarity: 3 (some clear, some subjective) - Solution Space Known: 5 (two options) - Single Answer Needed: 5 (must pick one) - Opposing Valid Views: 4 (both have merit) Top Patterns: 1. DR = 3.85 (opposing valid views present) 2. ToT = 3.60 (clear options to evaluate) Recommendation: Use DR to synthesize trade-offs, then ToT to score final decision. ``` ## Output Format When invoked, provide: 1. Dimension scores with reasoning 2. Pattern affinity calculations 3. Top 2-3 recommended patterns 4. Suggested execution approach 5. Confidence level (low/medium/high)