メニュー
Review a diff for comment hygiene — over-commenting, what-not-why narration, inaccurate comments, and missing TODOs on compatibility shims.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Build and manage a kind cluster for Workload-Aware Scheduling (WAS) e2e tests. Use when the user wants to set up, run tests against, or tear down a WAS test cluster built from Kubernetes main.
Flag solutions more elaborate than the problem requires — complexity that exists only because the author reached for a pattern.
Flag identical (or near-identical) blocks across types/adapters/call sites that should live in a shared helper — and newly extracted helpers with only one caller.
Flag code organization that a future maintainer will struggle to follow, modify, or extend.
Flag code put somewhere a reader would not expect to find it — cleanup scattered across callers, validation deep in business logic.
Flag unnecessary indirection, mismatched abstractions, or confusing data flow that obscures what the code is doing.
| name | comments |
| description | Review a diff for comment hygiene — over-commenting, what-not-why narration, inaccurate comments, and missing TODOs on compatibility shims. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"copyright":"The Kubernetes Authors"} |
Use this when reviewing a diff for comment hygiene: too many, too few in the wrong places, or — worst — comments that lie about what the code does.
Each rule in this domain is its own sub-skill. Scan the diff for violations of every rule below.
| Rule | Triggers on |
|---|---|
| over-commenting | comments that explain what self-documenting code already says |
| wrong-kind-of-comment | comments describing what instead of why |
| inaccurate-comments | comments or docstrings that no longer match the code |
| missing-deferred-removal-markers | compatibility shim kept without a deferred-removal comment |
| comment-typos | typos and obvious errors in comment text |
@./over-commenting/SKILL.md @./wrong-kind-of-comment/SKILL.md @./inaccurate-comments/SKILL.md @./missing-deferred-removal-markers/SKILL.md @./comment-typos/SKILL.md
Cite the exact file and line, describe the problem, and classify severity (high / medium / low). Inaccurate comments that will mislead a future maintainer, and missing deferred-removal markers on compatibility shims, are high. Over-commenting and what-not-why narration are typically low. Full marks are warranted when comments are absent or limited to explaining the non-obvious why — do not invent findings.
Return two sections:
A bullet list, one per violation, in this format:
- <High/Medium/Low> | <Finding Title>: <one-sentence explanation grounded in the diff>
One recommendation per finding above, numbered sequentially within this skill. Each recommendation MUST contain all four sections below.
### Recommendation N: <short title>
**Problem**: Describe the specific issue in the diff.
**Reason**: Explain why this is a problem — what goes wrong or degrades over time.
**Solution**: Give a concrete, actionable fix. Where possible, show a before/after code snippet.
**Locations**: List every place this issue occurs, one per line, in `filepath:line` form.