Skip to main content

porters-five-forces

Systematically assess the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry by analyzing five fundamental forces that shape competition and profitability

ソース情報

リポジトリ
lev-os/agents
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年3月7日 00:14
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
23
フォーク
2

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
porters-five-forces
description
Systematically assess the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry by analyzing five fundamental forces that shape competition and profitability
# Porter's Five Forces ## Pattern Type `strategic-analysis` • `competitive-intelligence` • `industry-assessment` ## Intent Systematically assess the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry by analyzing five fundamental forces that shape competition and profitability. ## Also Known As - Five Forces Framework - Porter's Competitive Forces Model - Industry Structure Analysis ## Core Problem Organizations struggle to understand the structural drivers of industry profitability and competitive intensity. Without a systematic framework, companies make strategic decisions based on incomplete competitive intelligence, leading to poor market positioning and unexpected profit erosion from suppliers, buyers, substitutes, or new entrants. ## The Solution Pattern **Framework Overview:** Analyze five distinct competitive forces that collectively determine industry attractiveness and long-term profitability potential. **The Five Forces:** 1. **Threat of New Entrants** - Barriers to entry: capital requirements, economies of scale, brand loyalty, regulatory hurdles - Switching costs for customers - Access to distribution channels - Expected retaliation from incumbents 2. **Bargaining Power of Suppliers** - Supplier concentration vs. industry concentration - Availability of substitute inputs - Importance of volume to suppliers - Switching costs to alternative suppliers - Forward integration potential 3. **Bargaining Power of Buyers** - Buyer concentration vs. industry concentration - Volume of purchases - Product differentiation - Buyer switching costs - Backward integration potential - Price sensitivity 4. **Threat of Substitute Products/Services** - Relative price-performance of substitutes - Buyer propensity to substitute - Switching costs to substitutes - Emerging alternatives from other industries 5. **Competitive Rivalry Among Existing Firms** - Number and diversity of competitors - Industry growth rate - Fixed costs and exit barriers - Product differentiation - Strategic stakes - Capacity additions ## Implementation Protocol ### Step 1: Define Industry Boundaries - Identify the specific industry segment to analyze - Document major players, market size, and growth trends - Clarify geographic and product scope of analysis ### Step 2: Assess Threat of New Entrants - List barriers to entry (capital, expertise, regulation, distribution) - Rate barrier strength: Low/Medium/High - Identify potential new entrants monitoring the space - Assess likelihood of entry in 1-3 year horizon ### Step 3: Evaluate Supplier Power - Map key supplier categories and concentration - Assess switching costs and availability of alternatives - Rate supplier power: Weak/Moderate/Strong - Identify strategies to reduce supplier leverage ### Step 4: Evaluate Buyer Power - Segment customers by concentration and volume - Assess buyer switching costs and differentiation - Rate buyer power: Weak/Moderate/Strong - Identify strategies to reduce buyer leverage ### Step 5: Analyze Threat of Substitutes - List direct and indirect substitutes - Compare price-performance vs. current offerings - Assess switching barriers and adoption trends - Rate substitution threat: Low/Medium/High ### Step 6: Map Competitive Rivalry - Count direct competitors and assess diversity - Evaluate industry growth rate and capacity dynamics - Rate rivalry intensity: Low/Moderate/Intense - Identify competitive advantages and strategic positioning ### Step 7: Synthesize Overall Industry Attractiveness - Aggregate force ratings into overall assessment - Identify which forces are strengthening/weakening - Determine if industry is structurally attractive - Flag forces that pose greatest strategic risk ### Step 8: Develop Strategic Responses - For each high-impact force, identify mitigation strategies - Prioritize initiatives to improve competitive position - Set monitoring triggers for force shifts - Update analysis quarterly or when major market changes occur ## When to Apply - **Market Entry Decisions**: Evaluate new industry or geography before investment - **Strategic Planning Cycles**: Annual assessment of competitive landscape - **M&A Due Diligence**: Assess target industry attractiveness - **Competitive Positioning**: Understand structural profit drivers - **Industry Shifts**: Major regulatory, technological, or market changes - **Investor Analysis**: Evaluate long-term industry sustainability ## Expected Outcomes - Structured understanding of industry profit drivers - Identification of strategic vulnerabilities and opportunities - Data-driven industry attractiveness assessment - Competitive response strategies prioritized by force strength - Early warning system for competitive threats ## Anti-Patterns - **Static Analysis**: Treating Five Forces as one-time assessment rather than ongoing monitoring - **Missing Dynamics**: Failing to assess how forces are changing over time - **Oversimplification**: Rating all forces equally without identifying key drivers - **Internal Focus**: Analyzing only current competitors, ignoring potential entrants and substitutes - **No Action**: Completing analysis without developing strategic responses - **Wrong Scope**: Analyzing overly broad or narrow industry definitions ## Edge Cases - **Multi-Sided Platforms**: Analyze separate forces for each customer segment - **Rapidly Converging Industries**: Expand substitutes analysis to adjacent sectors - **Emerging Markets**: Weight regulatory and infrastructure barriers more heavily - **Declining Industries**: Focus on exit barriers and consolidation dynamics - **Network Effect Businesses**: Incorporate switching cost analysis into buyer power ## Canonical Source **Michael E. Porter** (Harvard Business School, 1979) - Original article: "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy" (Harvard Business Review, 1979) - Book: "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors" (1980) - Harvard Business School Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness ## Adjacent Patterns - **SWOT Analysis**: Internal capabilities assessment to complement external Five Forces - **Value Chain Analysis**: Porter's internal activity framework - **PESTLE Analysis**: Macro-environmental forces affecting industry structure - **Strategic Group Analysis**: Competitor clustering within Five Forces framework - **Blue Ocean Strategy**: Creating uncontested markets by reshaping forces ## Quality Criteria - [ ] All five forces explicitly analyzed with evidence - [ ] Force ratings justified with quantitative data where possible - [ ] Industry boundaries clearly defined and scoped - [ ] Temporal dynamics assessed (forces strengthening/weakening) - [ ] Strategic implications identified for each force - [ ] Concrete action items with owners and timelines - [ ] Monitoring triggers defined for force changes **Score: 46/50** (Tier 1 Canonical) - Practitioner Weight: 10/10 (Adopted globally across industries) - Clarity: 9/10 (Five forces explicit, execution well-documented) - Proven ROI: 9/10 (40+ years validation, strategy cornerstone) - Novelty: 8/10 (Revolutionary when published, now foundational) - Cross-Domain: 10/10 (Applies to any competitive industry) ## Evidence - Used in strategic planning by Fortune 500 companies for 40+ years - Core MBA curriculum framework worldwide - Quantitative correlation between force strength and industry profitability - Continuous updates by Porter for digital, platform, and AI-era industries
GitHubで見る