microsoft-bcquality-assets-al-ui-review

name	microsoft-bcquality-assets-al-ui-review
description	Imported BCQuality skill from microsoft/skills/review/al-ui-review.md

AL UI and accessibility review

Source: microsoft/skills/review/al-ui-review.md

Bundled consumption note. This extension packages BCQuality as VS Code chat skills and chat instructions under assets/generated/microsoft-bcquality-assets. Do not probe an external clone, skills/entry.md, skills/read.md, skills/do.md, or knowledge-index.json when using this bundled copy. Treat this SKILL.md plus the bundled BCQuality instruction files whose Source: paths match the active domain as the packaged knowledge surface. This note overrides upstream clone-oriented path references preserved below for provenance.

AL UI and accessibility review

Reviews AL page source and control add-in UI files against the ui knowledge domain in BCQuality and emits a findings report. This is a leaf action skill: it invokes no sub-skills. It is one of the skills composed by al-code-review.

UI findings apply to page files, files that declare PageType = ..., including *.Page.al under the standard file-naming convention, and to JavaScript/CSS/HTML files that implement Business Central control add-ins, including their client-service communication. The skill returns not-applicable when the diff contains no page or control add-in changes.

An orchestrator invokes this skill with either a pr-diff or a file-path. The skill produces a single JSON document conforming to the DO output contract.

Source

Read the BCQuality knowledge index once, the knowledge-index.json BCQuality builds at the root of the knowledge checkout (Entry's preparation step regenerates it over the live, already-filtered clone, see skills/entry.md). It lists every article that survived layer and allow/deny filtering and carries, per article, its path, layer, domain, frontmatter dimensions, keywords, title, and a one-line description hint, exactly the fields Relevance and Worklist consume. Take the index entries whose domain is ui as this skill's candidate set across every enabled layer; do not open the individual article files at this step. Open an article's full body only once it enters the Worklist below, so a review reads the index plus the handful of worklisted articles instead of every file under */knowledge/ui/**.

Relevance

Apply the frontmatter matching rules defined in READ against the task context:

• bc-version, the target BC version from the PR branch's app.json or the orchestrator-supplied version. If unavailable, the dimension is unknown.
• technologies, [al] or [javascript].
• countries, the countries declared in the consuming app's app.json. If absent, unknown.
• application-area, pass the actual set declared by the changed objects; do not substitute [all].

Discard files that are not applicable. Retain conditionally applicable files only when the orchestrator's configuration permits them; findings derived from those files MUST have confidence no higher than medium and MUST name the unknown dimensions in message.

Worklist

Narrow the relevant files to the subset that applies to the changes under review.

• UI-file filter. UI review applies to files declaring page, pageextension, or pagecustomization, and to JavaScript/CSS/HTML that implements a control add-in's rendering or Business Central communication. When the diff contains no such files, return outcome: "not-applicable" without evaluating knowledge files.
• For each relevant knowledge file, compute overlap against changed page declarations and control add-in files, weighted toward Caption, ToolTip, AboutTitle, AboutText, OptionCaption, ShowCaption, InstructionalText, GridLayout, Style, StyleExpr, promoted action definitions, field importance, page background tasks, DOM creation, ARIA attributes, keyboard/focus handlers, packaged-resource AJAX, and calls from JavaScript into AL.
• Tokens extracted from the diff (Caption, ToolTip, AboutTitle, AboutText, PageType, ShowCaption, InstructionalText, grid, fixed, GridLayout, Style, StyleExpr, Importance, Promoted, Additional, area(Promoted), actionref, PromotedCategory, PromotedOnly, PromotedIsBig, ShowAs, SplitButton, EnqueueBackgroundTask, OnAfterGetCurrRecord, OnAfterGetRecord, OnPageBackgroundTaskCompleted, OnPageBackgroundTaskError, RunPageBackgroundTask, Favorable, Unfavorable, Ambiguous, cuegroup, controladdin, control-add-in, usercontrol, aria-, tabindex, keydown, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , in a page context, , , , , trailing punctuation patterns on captions).

A file enters the candidate worklist when its keywords intersect the extracted tokens or its topic (derived from the index entry's path, title, and description) matches a changed page element. Read an article's full file, its ## Best Practice / ## Anti Pattern bodies, only after it makes the worklist; candidate selection uses the index alone.

Once the candidate worklist is known, resolve layer-precedence conflicts per READ and record suppressions.

When the post-conflict worklist is empty because no applicable UI knowledge exists, or because configuration suppressed every candidate, emit outcome: "no-knowledge". When the worklist is empty because no applicable UI knowledge matched the page changes, emit outcome: "completed" with an empty findings array.

Action

For each worklist entry, evaluate the diff against the file's ## Best Practice and ## Anti Pattern sections. UI text findings are generally minor, they affect localization and polish rather than correctness. Accessibility findings for missing labels, broken grid semantics, semantic color without text meaning, or UI-rendering control add-in changes can be major; use minor for low-risk manual-review reminders and polish issues.

For packaged-resource requests, flag $.get or AJAX/XHR that omits withCredentials only when the URL is identifiable as a resource in the control add-in package; do not generalize the rule to external endpoints. For InvokeExtensibilityMethod, flag repeated or timer-driven calls that can overlap because they do not wait for the success/error callbacks, and unbounded serialized payloads sent in one call. Prefer bounded chunks serialized through completion callbacks. Do not emit generic browser or JavaScript performance advice.

Set confidence to:

• high when the detection is based on an unambiguous pattern match (banned term literal, missing "Specifies" opener on a field tooltip, caption exceeding documented limit).
• medium when detection relies on heuristics (judging whether a caption is a noun phrase or a sentence phrase) or when any frontmatter dimension was unknown.
• low when the finding is an advisory derived only from applicability.

This leaf emits only knowledge-backed UI and accessibility findings. Do NOT emit reference-less agent: findings in this domain: online evaluation shows the UI/accessibility agent-finding channel yields almost no accepted findings and a high volume of dismissed noise, so a UI or accessibility concern that no worklist knowledge file covers is omitted here rather than emitted with references: []. When you spot a material UI or accessibility defect no article covers, the durable fix is to add a knowledge article in BCQuality (per the online-eval self-improvement loop) so this leaf can cite it, not a one-off reference-less finding. Before treating a candidate as uncovered, check the worklist for a knowledge file that matches it; if one exists, emit it as a knowledge-backed finding. See skills/do.md for the full contract.

For every emitted finding, decide whether the fix is mechanical. A fix is mechanical when it is small, local, and unambiguous from the diff context (for example: delete unreachable lines; replace Count() > 0 with not IsEmpty(); move a local Label to object scope; add a missing ToolTip, OptionCaption, or DataClassification; replace a string-concatenated Error with a Label-backed call; change an over-broad permission token; or add an obvious else/guard branch). For mechanical findings, emit findings[].suggested-code with the literal replacement for the source lines indicated by location. The payload must be a verbatim replacement, no diff markers, no fences, no commentary, that the consumer can render as a one-click suggestion. When a .good.al companion exists and the diff context matches the .bad.al shape, adapt the .good.al replacement into suggested-code.

Omit suggested-code only when the appropriate fix depends on context the skill cannot determine, when multiple defensible replacements exist, or when the fix spans non-contiguous code. If a finding is mechanical-looking but you omit suggested-code, set findings[].suggested-code-omission-reason to a short explanation. See skills/do.md for the full contract.

Outcome selection:

• completed, the skill evaluated every worklist item.
• no-knowledge, no applicable UI knowledge survived filtering.
• not-applicable, the diff contains no page, pageextension, pagecustomization, or control add-in implementation files.
• partial, a budget was hit before the worklist was exhausted.
• failed, an unrecoverable error occurred.

Output

Output conforms to the DO output contract. Every finding this skill emits MUST set findings[].domain to "Accessibility". A populated example:

{
  "skill": { "id": "al-ui-review", "version": 1 },
  "outcome": "completed",
  "summary": {
    "counts": { "blocker": 0, "major": 0, "minor": 1, "info": 0 },
    "coverage": { "worklist-size": 1, "items-evaluated": 1 }
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "microsoft/knowledge/ui/show-caption-on-editable-fields.md"