skill-creator

name	skill-creator
description	Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and evaluate whether they route and behave correctly in OMC. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit an existing skill, improve skill triggering, or iterate on a skill with prompt-based tests.
argument-hint	<skill-goal-or-skill-path>
metadata	{"short-description":"Create or upgrade a skill"}

Skill Creator

A skill for creating new skills and iteratively improving them.

This local version is based on the vendored Anthropic upstream file at references/upstream-anthropic-skill-creator.md, then adapted for OMC conventions and tooling.

Adaptation Summary

• Upstream baseline: overall skill-creation loop, communication guidance, capture-intent flow, anatomy, progressive disclosure, and writing principles
• Local OMC adaptation: replaces upstream eval-viewer and benchmark workflow with skill-quality-analyzer, skill-debugger, and skill-tester
• Local OMC adaptation: keeps OpenCode-oriented metadata examples used in this repo
• Local OMC adaptation: confines project-specific orchestration fields such as pipeline, next-skill, and handoff to explicit local sections
• Maintenance rule: when upstream changes, update the vendored file first, then re-apply only the minimal OMC-specific differences

Upstream Sync Policy

Treat references/upstream-anthropic-skill-creator.md as the authoritative upstream baseline for structure and intent.

When updating this local file:

• compare against the vendored upstream file first
• preserve the upstream section order unless there is a concrete local reason not to
• keep OMC-specific behavior in clearly labeled local sections
• do not silently replace upstream guidance with local conventions
• if upstream and OMC differ, prefer upstream for general skill-authoring advice and confine OMC differences to explicit adaptation notes

When Anthropic updates the upstream file:

1. refresh the vendored upstream copy
2. diff the upstream copy against this local file
3. pull forward structural and wording improvements that still fit OMC
4. re-check OMC-specific sections so they remain isolated and justified

At a high level, the process of creating a skill in OMC goes like this:

• Decide what you want the skill to do and roughly how it should do it
• Write a draft of the skill
• Create a few realistic test prompts and run prompt-level checks
• Review the results both qualitatively and structurally
• Rewrite the skill based on what you learn
• Repeat until routing and behavior are stable
• Expand the test set and try again at larger scale if needed

Your job when using this skill is to figure out where the user is in this process and then help them move forward. Sometimes that means interviewing and drafting. Sometimes it means jumping straight to evaluation and revision.

After the draft exists, the normal OMC collaboration loop is:

1. skill-quality-analyzer for static review
2. skill-debugger for routing/configuration diagnosis
3. skill-tester for prompt-level verification
4. revise and repeat

Communicating with the User

People using this skill may have very different levels of technical familiarity. Phrase things according to the user's level.

In the default case:

• "evaluation" and "benchmark" are usually acceptable
• terms like "JSON", "frontmatter", or "assertion" may need a brief explanation

Prefer short explanations over jargon when unsure.

Creating a Skill

Capture Intent

Start by understanding the user's intent. The current conversation may already contain the workflow the user wants to capture.

Extract from the conversation first:

• tools that were used
• sequence of steps
• corrections the user made
• input and output formats

Then fill the gaps:

1. What should this skill enable OpenCode to do?
2. When should this skill trigger?
3. What should the output or effect look like?
4. Should we set up prompt tests to verify the skill works?

Skills with objectively checkable outputs benefit from test cases. Purely subjective skills may need lighter evaluation.

Interview and Research

Ask about:

• edge cases
• input and output formats
• example files
• success criteria
• dependencies
• nearby requests that should go elsewhere

Do not write test prompts until the intended boundaries are clear.

If outside research is useful, use primary sources and repo context first.

Write the SKILL.md

Based on the interview, fill in:

• name
• description
• optional behavior metadata
• the actual instructions

The description is the primary discovery mechanism. It should say both what the skill does and when to use it.

Because skills tend to under-trigger, descriptions should be a little pushy. Do not make them vague taglines.

Skill Writing Guide

Anatomy of a Skill

skill-name/
├── SKILL.md
├── Bundled Resources
│   ├── scripts/
│   ├── references/
│   └── assets/
└── agents/
    └── openai.yaml

SKILL.md

Every SKILL.md consists of:

• frontmatter
• markdown instructions

The main discovery surface is:

• name
• description

Recommended local frontmatter shape:

---
name: skill-name
description: When to use the skill and what it does.
argument-hint: "<args>"
disable-model-invocation: false
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools:
  - read
  - grep
model: glm-5.2
---

Bundled Resources

scripts/

Use when the same code keeps getting rewritten or determinism matters.

references/

Use for documentation OpenCode should read only when needed.

assets/

Use for templates, icons, fonts, sample deliverables, and similar output resources.

What Not to Include in a Skill

A skill should contain the files needed for another agent to do the work, not extra process documentation.

Avoid adding:

• README.md
• INSTALLATION_GUIDE.md
• QUICK_REFERENCE.md
• CHANGELOG.md

Progressive Disclosure

Skills use a three-level loading model:

1. metadata
2. SKILL.md body
3. bundled resources

Guidelines:

• keep SKILL.md compact
• split detail into references/ before the file becomes hard to scan
• clearly point from SKILL.md to any follow-up files
• avoid deeply nested references

Principle of Lack of Surprise

Skills must not contain malware, exploit code, or misleading behavior. The contents of the skill should match what the description leads a user to expect.

Writing Patterns

Prefer imperative instructions.

Defining output formats:

## Report structure
ALWAYS use this exact template:
# [Title]
## Executive summary
## Key findings
## Recommendations

Examples pattern:

## Commit message format
**Example 1:**
Input: Added user authentication with JWT tokens
Output: feat(auth): implement JWT-based authentication

Writing Style

Explain why important things matter instead of only piling up MUSTs. Prefer a draft-and-revise approach over trying to write the perfect skill in one pass.

Test Cases

After writing the draft, come up with 2-3 realistic test prompts. Share them with the user or validate them yourself if the intent is already clear.

In OMC, prefer a prompt matrix with:

• obvious positive cases
• borderline positive cases
• obvious negative cases

The best negative cases are near-misses, not completely unrelated requests.

Running and Evaluating Test Cases in OMC

This local adaptation does not rely on Anthropic's upstream benchmark viewer scripts as the primary workflow. Use the OMC toolchain instead.

Step 1: Static Review

Run skill-quality-analyzer to inspect:

• discovery surface
• structure
• examples and eval coverage
• execution safety
• maintainability

Step 2: Routing and Config Review

Run skill-debugger to inspect:

• under-triggering
• over-triggering
• name/description collisions
• metadata issues such as disable-model-invocation, user-invocable, and allowed-tools

Step 3: Prompt-Level Verification

Run skill-tester with:

• positive prompts
• borderline prompts
• negative prompts

Check both selection and behavior after selection.

Step 4: Revise

Bias revisions toward:

• tightening description
• narrowing overlap with neighboring skills
• fixing metadata that blocks routing
• bundling deterministic resources where repetition keeps appearing

Step 5: Repeat Until Stable

Continue until:

• the skill triggers for clear in-scope prompts
• the skill stays quiet for clear out-of-scope prompts
• the body and bundled resources are proportionate to the task

OMC-Specific Extensions

The upstream Anthropic file is the baseline. The fields below are local OMC extensions and should be treated as project-specific:

pipeline: [skill-a, skill-b]
next-skill: skill-b
next-skill-args: --direct
handoff: .omc/plans/example.md

Use them only when this repository actually consumes them.

Deliverables

A finished local skill should have:

• a valid SKILL.md
• a differentiated description
• justified bundled resources
• positive and negative prompt examples
• evidence from analyzer/debugger/tester passes

Success Checklist

• skill package exists at skills/<name>/SKILL.md
• name matches the folder name
• description clearly says when to use the skill and what it does
• prompt matrix covers positive, borderline, and negative cases
• skill-quality-analyzer feedback addressed
• skill-debugger feedback addressed
• skill-tester feedback addressed