Skip to main content

thermos

Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
michael-denyer/pstack-claude
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年10月13日 00:45
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
2,447
フォーク
226

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
thermos
description
Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.
# Thermos On Codex, read the [platform mapping](../poteto-mode/references/codex-tools.md), including its per-skill notes, before following this skill. On GitHub Copilot, read the [platform mapping](../poteto-mode/references/copilot-tools.md), including its per-skill notes, before following this skill. Run the two thermo review passes as async background subagents in parallel, then synthesize their results. ## Workflow 1. Determine the review scope from the user request, PR, current branch, or relevant changed files. 2. Gather the diff and any file/context excerpts needed for reviewers to evaluate the change without guessing. 3. Launch both subagents in the same message with `run_in_background: true`: - `subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-review-subagent"` for bugs, breakages, security, devex regressions, feature-flag leaks, and other branch-audit risks. - `subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent"` for maintainability, structure, file-size growth, spaghetti, abstractions, and codebase-health risks. 4. Pass each subagent the same scoped diff/file context and ask it to return prioritized findings with file references and evidence. 5. After both finish, synthesize the results with findings first, deduplicated across reviewers. Weight overlapping findings more heavily, resolve disagreements with your own judgment, and keep summaries brief. If individual background summaries are already visible to the user, do not restate them wholesale. Surface the unified verdict, the highest-signal findings, and any remaining uncertainty.
GitHubで見る