ワンクリックで
docs-review
Review documentation for accuracy, completeness, and consistency against the actual codebase.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Review documentation for accuracy, completeness, and consistency against the actual codebase.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
MindRoom documentation corpus for accurate product, configuration, and workflow guidance.
Run live end-to-end checks for this repository. Use when booting the local MindRoom stack or SaaS sandbox, starting an isolated local Matrix/backend instance, creating disposable Matrix accounts, sending or reading messages with Matty, hitting live API endpoints, taking frontend screenshots, or verifying behavior through the real UI instead of tests alone. Also use when a live-test workflow struggled and the skill itself should be improved.
Use when the user asks for native Codex sub-agents, parallel PR review agents, unbiased re-review loops, or main-thread fixes after agent findings in the MindRoom repository.
Use when fetching, triaging, or addressing PR review comments from GitHub, copied text, cloud AI reviewers, or other coding agents in the MindRoom repository.
Two coding agents debate code changes through a shared DEBATE.md file. Use when you want adversarial review of a commit, diff, or PR.
Use when spawning and supervising multiple agent-cli Codex worktrees through tmux, especially when you must poll progress, force prompt rereads against the local TASK file, run current-context and fresh-context pr-review loops, and verify that review fixes are actually pushed before merge.
| name | docs-review |
| description | Review documentation for accuracy, completeness, and consistency against the actual codebase. |
Review documentation for accuracy, completeness, and consistency. Focus on things that require judgment—automated checks handle the rest.
Don't waste time on these—CI and pre-commit hooks handle them:
markdown-code-runner regenerates CLI help blocks via docs/run_markdown_code_runner.pyFocus on things that require judgment:
# What changed recently that might need doc updates?
git log --oneline -20 | grep -iE "feat|fix|add|remove|change|option"
# What code files changed?
git diff --name-only HEAD~20 | grep "\.py$"
Look for new features, changed defaults, renamed options, or removed functionality.
Compare docs under docs/configuration/ against the Pydantic models in src/mindroom/config.py. Don't rely on a fixed list of files — discover what exists in both locations and check they match.
# Find all config models
grep -r "class.*BaseModel" src/mindroom/config.py -A 15
# Find all config doc files
ls docs/configuration/
Check:
# What source files actually exist?
git ls-files "src/mindroom/**/*.py"
Check docs/architecture/ and the Architecture section of CLAUDE.md:
For every doc file under docs/, find the corresponding source module(s) and check they agree. Don't assume a fixed mapping — discover it:
ls docs/*.md docs/*/
ls src/mindroom/*.py src/mindroom/*/
Look for docs that describe features the code no longer has, or code with features the docs don't cover.
For examples in any doc:
config.yaml snippets actually work?The same info appears in multiple places. Check for conflicts between README.md, docs/, and CLAUDE.md.
Also verify that script paths and file references in CLAUDE.md and docs/deployment/ match the actual filesystem layout.
Check docs/deployment/ files against actual Dockerfiles, Helm charts, scripts, and environment variable defaults in src/mindroom/constants.py.
This prompt can become outdated too. If you notice:
Include prompt updates in your fixes.
Categorize findings:
For each issue, provide a ready-to-apply fix:
### Issue: [Brief description]
- **File**: path/to/file.md:42
- **Problem**: What's wrong
- **Fix**: What to change
- **Verify**: How to confirm