create-cowork-plugin

name	create-cowork-plugin
description	Cowork セッションでプラグインをゼロから作成するスキル。 「プラグインを作って」「プラグイン開発」「plugin作成」等のリクエストで発動。 Cowork モードで .plugin ファイルを生成。
compatibility	Requires Cowork desktop app environment with access to the outputs directory for delivering .plugin files.
source	github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins@main
triggers	["create-cowork-plugin","プラグインを作って","プラグイン開発","plugin作成","プラグイン設計","cowork plugin"]

Create Cowork Plugin

Build a new plugin from scratch through guided conversation. Walk the user through discovery, planning, design, implementation, and packaging — delivering a ready-to-install .plugin file at the end.

Overview

A plugin is a self-contained directory that extends Claude's capabilities with commands, skills, agents, hooks, and MCP server integrations. This skill encodes the full plugin architecture and a five-phase workflow for creating one conversationally.

The process:

1. Discovery — understand what the user wants to build
2. Component Planning — determine which component types are needed
3. Design & Clarifying Questions — specify each component in detail
4. Implementation — create all plugin files
5. Review & Package — deliver the .plugin file

Nontechnical output: Keep all user-facing conversation in plain language. Do not expose implementation details like file paths, directory structures, or schema fields unless the user asks. Frame everything in terms of what the plugin will do.

Plugin Architecture

Directory Structure

Every plugin follows this layout:

plugin-name/
├── .claude-plugin/
│   └── plugin.json           # Required: plugin manifest
├── commands/                 # Slash commands (.md files)
├── agents/                   # Subagent definitions (.md files)
├── skills/                   # Skills (subdirectories with SKILL.md)
│   └── skill-name/
│       ├── SKILL.md
│       └── references/
├── .mcp.json                 # MCP server definitions
└── README.md                 # Plugin documentation

Rules:

• .claude-plugin/plugin.json is always required
• Component directories (commands/, agents/, skills/) go at the plugin root, not inside .claude-plugin/
• Only create directories for components the plugin actually uses
• Use kebab-case for all directory and file names

plugin.json Manifest

Located at .claude-plugin/plugin.json. Minimal required field is name.

{
  "name": "plugin-name",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "description": "Brief explanation of plugin purpose",
  "author": {
    "name": "Author Name"
  }
}

Name rules: kebab-case, lowercase with hyphens, no spaces or special characters. Version: semver format (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH). Start at 0.1.0.

Optional fields: homepage, repository, license, keywords.

Custom component paths can be specified (supplements, does not replace, auto-discovery):

{
  "commands": "./custom-commands",
  "agents": ["./agents", "./specialized-agents"],
  "hooks": "./config/hooks.json",
  "mcpServers": "./.mcp.json"
}

Component Schemas

Detailed schemas for each component type are in references/component-schemas.md. Summary:

Component	Location	Format
Commands	commands/*.md	Markdown + YAML frontmatter
Skills	skills/*/SKILL.md	Markdown + YAML frontmatter
MCP Servers	.mcp.json	JSON
Agents (uncommonly used in Cowork)	agents/*.md	Markdown + YAML frontmatter
Hooks (rarely used in Cowork)	hooks/hooks.json	JSON

This schema is shared with Claude Code's plugin system, but you're creating a plugin for Claude Cowork, a desktop app for doing knowledge work. Cowork users will usually find commands and skills the most useful.

Customizable plugins with ~~ placeholders

Do not use or ask about this pattern by default. Only introduce ~~ placeholders if the user explicitly says they want people outside their organization to use the plugin. You can mention this is an option if it seems like the user wants to distribute the plugin externally, but do not proactively ask about this with AskUserQuestion.

When a plugin is intended to be shared with others outside their company, it might have parts that need to be adapted to individual users. You might need to reference external tools by category rather than specific product (e.g., "project tracker" instead of "Jira"). When sharing is needed, use generic language and mark these as requiring customization with two tilde characters such as create an issue in ~~project tracker. If used any tool categories, write a CONNECTORS.md file at the plugin root to explain:

# Connectors

## How tool references work

Plugin files use `~~category` as a placeholder for whatever tool the user
connects in that category. Plugins are tool-agnostic — they describe
workflows in terms of categories rather than specific products.

## Connectors for this plugin

| Category | Placeholder | Options |
|----------|-------------|-----------------|---------------|
| Chat | `~~chat` | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord |
| Project tracker | `~~project tracker` | Linear, Asana, Jira |

${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} Variable

Use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for all intra-plugin path references in hooks and MCP configs. Never hardcode absolute paths.

Guided Workflow

When you ask the user something, use AskUserQuestion. Don't assume "industry standard" defaults are correct. Note: AskUserQuestion always includes a Skip button and a free-text input box for custom answers, so do not include None or Other as options.

Phase 1: Discovery

Goal: Understand what the user wants to build and why.

Ask (only what is unclear — skip questions if the user's initial request already answers them):

• What should this plugin do? What problem does it solve?
• Who will use it and in what context?
• Does it integrate with any external tools or services?
• Is there a similar plugin or workflow to reference?

Summarize understanding and confirm before proceeding.

Output: Clear statement of plugin purpose and scope.

Phase 2: Component Planning

Goal: Determine which component types the plugin needs.

Based on the discovery answers, determine:

• Skills — Does it need specialized knowledge that Claude should load on-demand? (domain expertise, reference schemas, workflow guides)
• Commands — Are there user-initiated actions? (deploy, configure, analyze, review)
• MCP Servers — Does it need external service integration? (databases, APIs, SaaS tools)
• Agents (uncommon) — Are there autonomous multi-step tasks? (validation, generation, analysis)
• Hooks (rare) — Should something happen automatically on certain events? (enforce policies, load context, validate operations)

Present a component plan table, including component types you decided not to create:

| Component | Count | Purpose |
|-----------|-------|---------|
| Skills    | 1     | Domain knowledge for X |
| Commands  | 2     | /do-thing, /check-thing |
| Agents    | 0     | Not needed |
| Hooks     | 1     | Validate writes |
| MCP       | 1     | Connect to service Y |

Get user confirmation or adjustments before proceeding.

Output: Confirmed list of components to create.

Phase 3: Design & Clarifying Questions

Goal: Specify each component in detail. Resolve all ambiguities before implementation.

For each component type in the plan, ask targeted design questions. Present questions grouped by component type. Wait for answers before proceeding.

Skills:

• What user queries should trigger this skill?
• What knowledge domains does it cover?
• Should it include reference files for detailed content?

Commands:

• What arguments does each command accept?
• What tools does each command need? (Read, Write, Bash, Grep, etc.)
• Is each command interactive or automated?

Agents:

• Should each agent trigger proactively or only when requested?
• What tools does it need?
• What should the output format be?

Hooks:

• Which events? (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SessionStart, etc.)
• What behavior — validate, block, modify, add context?
• Prompt-based (LLM-driven) or command-based (deterministic script)?

MCP Servers:

• What server type? (stdio for local, SSE for hosted with OAuth, HTTP for REST APIs)
• What authentication method?
• What tools should be exposed?

If the user says "whatever you think is best," provide specific recommendations and get explicit confirmation.

Output: Detailed specification for every component.

Phase 4: Implementation

Goal: Create all plugin files following best practices.

Order of operations:

1. Create the plugin directory structure
2. Create plugin.json manifest
3. Create each component (see references/component-schemas.md for exact formats)
4. Create README.md documenting the plugin

Implementation guidelines:

• Commands are instructions FOR Claude, not messages to the user. Write them as directives about what to do.
• Skills use progressive disclosure: lean SKILL.md body (under 3,000 words), detailed content in references/. Frontmatter description must be third-person with specific trigger phrases.
• Agents need a description with <example> blocks showing triggering conditions, plus a system prompt in the markdown body.
• Hooks config goes in hooks/hooks.json. Use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for script paths. Prefer prompt-based hooks for complex logic.
• MCP configs go in .mcp.json at plugin root. Use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for local server paths. Document required env vars in README.

Phase 5: Review & Package

Goal: Deliver the finished plugin.

1. Summarize what was created — list each component and its purpose
2. Ask if the user wants any adjustments
3. Run claude plugin validate <path-to-plugin-json>; fix any errors and warnings
4. Package as a .plugin file:

zip -r /tmp/plugin-name.plugin /path/to/plugin-dir/. -x "*.DS_Store" && cp /tmp/plugin-name.plugin /path/to/outputs/plugin-name.plugin

Important: Always create the zip in /tmp/ first, then copy to the outputs folder. Writing directly to the outputs folder may fail due to permissions.

Naming: Use the plugin name from plugin.json for the .plugin file (e.g., if name is code-reviewer, output code-reviewer.plugin).

The .plugin file will appear in the chat as a rich preview where the user can browse the files and accept the plugin by pressing a button.

Best Practices

• Start small: Begin with the minimum viable set of components. A plugin with one well-crafted skill is more useful than one with five half-baked components.
• Progressive disclosure for skills: Core knowledge in SKILL.md, detailed reference material in references/, working examples in examples/.
• Clear trigger phrases: Skill descriptions should include specific phrases users would say. Agent descriptions should include <example> blocks.
• Commands are for Claude: Write command content as instructions for Claude to follow, not documentation for the user to read.
• Imperative writing style: Use verb-first instructions in skills ("Parse the config file," not "You should parse the config file").
• Portability: Always use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for intra-plugin paths, never hardcoded paths.
• Security: Use environment variables for credentials, HTTPS for remote servers, least-privilege tool access.

Additional Resources

• references/component-schemas.md — Detailed format specifications for every component type (commands, skills, agents, hooks, MCP, CONNECTORS.md)
• references/example-plugins.md — Three complete example plugin structures at different complexity levels