メニュー
Assesses current and target maturity, gaps, risks and roadmap priorities. Use when prioritising capability improvement or planning architecture roadmaps.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when reviewing code before merge to assess correctness, tests, maintainability, security and user impact.
Use when reviewing plans, recommendations, prioritisation, risk registers, retrospectives or agent outputs for judgement distortion from cognitive bias — not for checking whether an argument's premises validly support its conclusion.
Use when evaluating whether premises in plans, ADRs, reviews, security justifications or agent recommendations validly support their conclusions — for logical fallacies, not judgement distortion from cognitive bias.
Use when a coding agent needs robust problem solving, explicit decomposition, alternative-path exploration, program-aided reasoning, ReAct loops, or self-correction.
Use when generated code, plans, tests, prompts or architecture need critique, repair and verification before completion; especially for coding tasks requiring self-review, test-driven repair or quality gates.
Identifies risks, scores likelihood and impact, selects treatment, assigns owners and review cadence. Use when building or updating a risk register, treating agent autonomy risks, or deciding mitigate, transfer, accept or avoid.
| name | capability-maturity-assessment |
| description | Assesses current and target maturity, gaps, risks and roadmap priorities. Use when prioritising capability improvement or planning architecture roadmaps. |
Use when prioritising capability improvement.
Produce a practical, concise, traceable architecture artefact that a coding agent can use to guide implementation or review.
Align with BIZBOK business architecture practice: keep capabilities, value streams, processes, organisation, information concepts, initiatives and metrics separate, then link them from strategy to execution.
Do not score maturity by opinion alone.
For Manage Supplier Risk, use a five-level maturity scale with evidence for policy coverage, data quality, automated monitoring and remediation cadence. A current score of 2 and target of 4 may be justified for regulated suppliers, while low-risk office suppliers stay at 2. Prioritise actions by business exposure, not by a blanket maturity target.
