ワンクリックで
documentation-and-adrs
Use when a change needs durable documentation, an architecture decision record or maintainership guidance.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Use when a change needs durable documentation, an architecture decision record or maintainership guidance.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when reviewing code before merge to assess correctness, tests, maintainability, security and user impact.
Use when reviewing plans, recommendations, prioritisation, risk registers, retrospectives or agent outputs for judgement distortion from cognitive bias — not for checking whether an argument's premises validly support its conclusion.
Use when evaluating whether premises in plans, ADRs, reviews, security justifications or agent recommendations validly support their conclusions — for logical fallacies, not judgement distortion from cognitive bias.
Use when a coding agent needs robust problem solving, explicit decomposition, alternative-path exploration, program-aided reasoning, ReAct loops, or self-correction.
Use when generated code, plans, tests, prompts or architecture need critique, repair and verification before completion; especially for coding tasks requiring self-review, test-driven repair or quality gates.
Identifies risks, scores likelihood and impact, selects treatment, assigns owners and review cadence. Use when building or updating a risk register, treating agent autonomy risks, or deciding mitigate, transfer, accept or avoid.
| name | documentation-and-adrs |
| description | Use when a change needs durable documentation, an architecture decision record or maintainership guidance. |
| aliases | ["architecture-decision-records","docs-and-adrs"] |
Use this skill when a decision needs to be captured for future maintainers, or when the change alters repository conventions, usage guidance or release behaviour.
Capture the reason for the change, the options considered and the consequences so future work remains coherent.
For a validator rule change, document why the rule exists, which files it affects, what alternatives were considered and how maintainers validate compliance. Avoid repeating the implementation details from the script; focus on the decision, consequences and how future contributors should apply the rule.