メニュー
Use when a Research Architect candidate research spine and approved exemplar adaptation need to become a feasible, field-appropriate study design, analysis plan, validation strategy, and user action plan.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when reviewing, revising, or deciding whether to complete a Research Architect draft, especially when its reference adaptation, design, evidence, citations, claim boundaries, copying risk, or missing upstream artifacts need an auditable diagnosis.
Use when a user needs distinct, feasible Research Architect research-question options from a raw topic, available materials, constraints, and—when available—transferable logic from a target reference paper.
Use when a Research Architect project or existing draft needs claim-level literature support for background, positioning, methods, interpretation, limitations, or revision, rather than broad generic literature searching.
Use when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, and adapted reference logic that need to become a field-appropriate first draft or an audited revision.
Use when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, evidence-display plan, and bounded interpretation trail.
Use when starting or resuming a Research Architect project—including an existing draft that needs review—and you need to capture target reference papers, project materials, constraints, verification status, and the next deliverable.
| name | research-architect-design |
| description | Use when a Research Architect candidate research spine and approved exemplar adaptation need to become a feasible, field-appropriate study design, analysis plan, validation strategy, and user action plan. |
Translate a selected research option into an executable inquiry. Adapt the reference paper's function, never its vocabulary or unexamined assumptions.
Read:
paper_output/project_config.json
paper_output/source_inventory.md
paper_output/gap_map.md
paper_output/motivation_options_after_literature.md or selected research-question option
paper_output/exemplar_logic_profile.md # when target references exist
paper_output/exemplar_adaptation_plan.md # approved when target references exist
Require a selected candidate and, when applicable, approved adaptation. Do not require confirmed_research_spine.md before preparing the design: that confirmation occurs with the design at Gate 2. Return to brainstorming or literature when no feasible candidate exists.
Read ../research-architect/references/design-family-grammars.md and ../research-architect/references/study-design-framework.md. Use ../research-architect/templates/study_design_brief.md and ../research-architect/templates/study_component_registry.csv; write the registry as paper_output/study_component_registry.md.
Prepare:
paper_output/study_design_brief.md
paper_output/analysis_plan.md
paper_output/evaluation_plan.md
paper_output/study_component_registry.md
paper_output/threats_to_validity.md
For guided depth, produce the brief and registry first, then add the other planning artifacts when needed; standard and deep produce the full set.
Every component must state its research function, user action, evidence/material, analysis or interpretation, comparison/warrant, output, claim supported, completion criterion, and status. Match validity and inference controls to the selected design family.
Present the selected candidate spine and its study design together. Obtain one explicit user approval for both. Record it with python3 ../research-architect/scripts/run_state.py gate paper_output spine_and_design_approval <status>. Only then create or mark paper_output/confirmed_research_spine.md and treat the design as final. Until approval, label the spine and design proposed and do not route them as final inputs to evidence or drafting.
After approval, create paper_output/confirmed_research_spine.md.metadata.json
using ../research-architect/schemas/v1/confirmed_research_spine.schema.json.
Accept a supplied research question, draft methods, or outline without a full upstream trail. Identify assumptions and missing feasibility evidence, create a provisional design, and send unresolved framing or adaptation questions to intake/literature. Do not infer a target paper's logic if its full text is unavailable.