メニュー
Use when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, and adapted reference logic that need to become a field-appropriate first draft or an audited revision.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when reviewing, revising, or deciding whether to complete a Research Architect draft, especially when its reference adaptation, design, evidence, citations, claim boundaries, copying risk, or missing upstream artifacts need an auditable diagnosis.
Use when a user needs distinct, feasible Research Architect research-question options from a raw topic, available materials, constraints, and—when available—transferable logic from a target reference paper.
Use when a Research Architect project or existing draft needs claim-level literature support for background, positioning, methods, interpretation, limitations, or revision, rather than broad generic literature searching.
Use when a Research Architect candidate research spine and approved exemplar adaptation need to become a feasible, field-appropriate study design, analysis plan, validation strategy, and user action plan.
Use when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, evidence-display plan, and bounded interpretation trail.
Use when starting or resuming a Research Architect project—including an existing draft that needs review—and you need to capture target reference papers, project materials, constraints, verification status, and the next deliverable.
| name | research-architect-draft |
| description | Use when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, and adapted reference logic that need to become a field-appropriate first draft or an audited revision. |
Draft from verified research decisions and evidence; do not use prose to conceal missing research work.
Before new prose drafting, require:
paper_output/confirmed_research_spine.md
paper_output/evidence_bank.md
paper_output/claim_register.md
paper_output/citation_support_bank.md
paper_output/evidence_display_map.md
paper_output/exemplar_adaptation_plan.md # when target references exist
recorded MANDATORY Gate 3 evidence readiness
If evidence is incomplete, create or update paper_output/execution_plan.md from ../research-architect/templates/execution_plan.md and return to evidence/design; do not draft around the gap.
Read ../research-architect/references/first-draft-architecture.md. Use ../research-architect/templates/section_blueprints.md and ../research-architect/templates/writing_rationale_matrix.csv; write paper_output/writing_rationale_matrix.md as a Markdown table.
paper_output/section_blueprints.md and paper_output/writing_rationale_matrix.md. Each unit identifies its research-spine link, reference-derived function, project-specific adaptation, evidence/citation anchor, planned move, and claim boundary.paper_output/first_draft/main.md and paper_output/final_artifact_manifest.md; create main.tex only when useful.Choose an architecture that fits the design family and evidence mode. Keep methods/source logic, counterarguments, limitations, displays, and claims appropriate to the selected research tradition. Mark unresolved items as TODO_VERIFY, TODO_EVIDENCE, TODO_ADAPT, or TODO_CITATION rather than hiding them.
For an existing draft that needs review, route first through intake and audit; then apply its revision queue. If a user supplies only an outline or partial artifacts, produce a bounded blueprint or execution plan, not fabricated findings. For guided depth, draft only the approved core sections and state what evidence is still needed; standard and deep add the complete rationale and draft trail.