Skip to main content

ad-creative-analysis

Analyze ad creatives (images and videos) extracted from competitor research. Use when given a directory of ad images, video files, or transcripts to evaluate ad quality, score visual and messaging effectiveness, assign a scale score for viral/engagement potential, and generate a cross-creative pattern summary. Triggered by requests like "analyze these ads", "score these creatives", "what hooks are competitors using", "evaluate the ad library", "give me a scale score", "analyze the ad folder", or "what's working in these ads".

ソース情報

リポジトリ
modbender/skill-library-mcp
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年3月6日 18:33
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
12
フォーク
3

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
ad-creative-analysis
description
Analyze ad creatives (images and videos) extracted from competitor research. Use when given a directory of ad images, video files, or transcripts to evaluate ad quality, score visual and messaging effectiveness, assign a scale score for viral/engagement potential, and generate a cross-creative pattern summary. Triggered by requests like "analyze these ads", "score these creatives", "what hooks are competitors using", "evaluate the ad library", "give me a scale score", "analyze the ad folder", or "what's working in these ads".
# Ad Creative Analysis Analyze a directory of competitor or reference ad creatives. Produce a per-creative JSON analysis and a cross-creative pattern summary. ## Step 1 — Accept Inputs Expect one of: - A directory path containing image files (`.jpg`, `.jpeg`, `.png`, `.webp`, `.gif`) and/or video files (`.mp4`, `.mov`, `.avi`, `.webm`) - An optional `metadata.json` file in that directory with fields per filename: `platform`, `spend`, `duration_days`, `impressions`, `format` If no path is given, ask the user: "Please provide the directory path containing the ad creatives." List all files in the directory. Separate into image ads and video ads. Log the count of each before proceeding. ## Step 2 — Analyze Image Ads For each image file, use vision/image analysis to evaluate the following. ### Design Evaluation Assess these five dimensions: 1. **Visual hierarchy** — Is the eye drawn to the right element first? Is there a clear focal point? 2. **Color usage** — Does the palette create contrast, evoke emotion, and maintain brand coherence? 3. **Text overlay readability** — Is copy legible at a glance? Font size, contrast, placement? 4. **CTA prominence** — Is the call-to-action visually distinct, clearly placed, and easy to act on? 5. **Brand consistency** — Logo placement, color adherence, font alignment with brand identity. ### Image Scores (1-10 each) - `attention_grab` — How fast and strongly does the creative stop a scroll? - `message_clarity` — How clearly is the core message communicated without needing context? - `cta_strength` — How compelling and action-oriented is the CTA? ### Image Extraction Extract: - `primary_message` — The single core thing this ad is communicating (one sentence) - `emotion_appeal` — One of: fear, aspiration, social_proof, urgency, curiosity, humor, trust, belonging, exclusivity - `target_audience` — Inferred from visuals, copy, and context (e.g., "women 25-35 interested in fitness") - `hook_text` — The first piece of copy the eye lands on (headline or main text) ## Step 3 — Analyze Video Ads For each video file, analyze the video directly using vision. If a transcript file exists alongside the video (same filename, `.txt` or `.srt` extension), read and use it. ### Video Evaluation Assess these four dimensions: 1. **Hook quality (first 3 seconds)** — Does it immediately create curiosity, shock, or recognition? Would someone stop scrolling? 2. **Script structure** — Does it follow a logical persuasion arc (problem, solution, proof, CTA)? 3. **Pacing** — Is the editing rhythm appropriate for platform and audience? Not too slow or rushed? 4. **CTA placement** — Is the call-to-action clear, timed well, and repeated if needed? ### Video Scale Score (1-10) Assign a single `scale_score` representing the ad's viral and engagement potential at scale: - **9-10**: Exceptional hook, tight script, clear CTA. Likely to perform well at high spend. - **7-8**: Strong fundamentals, minor weaknesses. Good candidate for testing. - **5-6**: Average execution. Needs a stronger hook or clearer CTA before scaling. - **3-4**: Core idea present but poor execution. Requires significant rework. - **1-2**: Unlikely to perform. Fundamental issues with hook, message, or CTA. See `references/analysis-framework.md` for detailed scale score rubric. ### Video Extraction Extract: - `hook_text` — Exact words spoken or shown in the first 3 seconds - `hook_type` — One of: question, bold_claim, pain_point, curiosity_gap, social_proof, before_after, demonstration - `main_message` — The core value proposition stated in the ad - `emotion_appeal` — One of: fear, aspiration, social_proof, urgency, curiosity, humor, trust, belonging, exclusivity - `cta_text` — The exact CTA spoken or shown - `cta_timing` — When the CTA appears (e.g., "end", "middle", "repeated throughout") ## Step 4 — Universal Metadata (All Ad Types) For every creative, regardless of type, record: - `filename` — The file name - `ad_format` — One of: single_image, carousel, video, story, reel - `aspect_ratio` — Detected or inferred (e.g., `1:1`, `9:16`, `16:9`, `4:5`) - `dimensions` — Width x height in pixels if detectable - `ad_objective` — Inferred from content and CTA: `awareness`, `consideration`, or `conversion` - `platform_fit` — Which platforms this format and ratio suits best (e.g., `["Instagram Feed", "Facebook Feed"]`) ## Step 5 — Output Per-Creative JSON Output one JSON object per creative. Print all results together in a single JSON array. ### Image ad example structure ```json { "filename": "ad_001.jpg", "type": "image", "ad_format": "single_image", "aspect_ratio": "1:1", "dimensions": "1080x1080", "ad_objective": "conversion", "platform_fit": ["Instagram Feed", "Facebook Feed"], "scores": { "attention_grab": 8, "message_clarity": 7, "cta_strength": 9 }, "primary_message": "Lose 10kg in 30 days without giving up your favourite food", "emotion_appeal": "aspiration", "target_audience": "Women 28-45 who have tried dieting before", "hook_text": "Still counting calories? There's a better way." } ``` ### Video ad example structure ```json { "filename": "ad_002.mp4", "type": "video", "ad_format": "video", "aspect_ratio": "9:16", "dimensions": "1080x1920", "ad_objective": "consideration", "platform_fit": ["TikTok", "Instagram Reels", "Facebook Reels"], "scale_score": 8, "hook_text": "I was $40,000 in debt until I found this", "hook_type": "before_after", "main_message": "This budgeting app helped me pay off debt in 18 months", "emotion_appeal": "fear", "cta_text": "Download free — link in bio", "cta_timing": "end" } ``` ## Step 6 — Generate Cross-Creative Summary After analyzing all creatives, produce a `summary` object appended to the output. Include: - `total_analyzed` — Count of creatives analyzed (split by type) - `top_performers` — Filenames of the top 3 creatives by score (images by average score, videos by scale score) - `dominant_emotion` — Most frequently detected emotion appeal across all ads - `common_hooks` — List of recurring hook patterns or phrases observed - `cta_patterns` — Most common CTA structures seen (e.g., "verb + free + urgency") - `dominant_objective` — Most common inferred ad objective - `format_breakdown` — Count per ad format - `recommendations` — 3-5 actionable observations for improving or scaling these creatives ### Summary example structure ```json { "summary": { "total_analyzed": { "images": 5, "videos": 3 }, "top_performers": ["ad_004.jpg", "ad_002.mp4", "ad_007.jpg"], "dominant_emotion": "aspiration", "common_hooks": [ "Question-based hook challenging a common belief", "Before/after framing in first sentence" ], "cta_patterns": [ "Shop now + scarcity signal", "Free trial + no credit card" ], "dominant_objective": "conversion", "format_breakdown": { "single_image": 4, "video": 3, "carousel": 1 }, "recommendations": [ "Hooks are strong but CTAs lack urgency — test adding 'today only' or limited quantity", "All videos open with talking head — test a demonstration hook for variety", "Aspiration dominates — test a fear/pain angle to broaden audience response" ] } } ``` ## Step 7 — Handle Missing or Unreadable Files If a file cannot be analyzed (corrupted, unsupported format, too dark/blurry for vision): - Include the filename in the output with `"status": "unreadable"` and a brief `"reason"` field - Continue analyzing remaining files, do not stop ## Reference Material Consult `skills/ad-creative-analysis/references/analysis-framework.md` for: - Detailed scoring rubrics per metric - Ad psychology pattern definitions - Hook formula templates - Extended example output
GitHubで見る