| name | codex |
| description | Independent second-opinion workflow for Codex. Use when the user wants an adversarial review, a second-pass challenge, or a separate consultation mode inside the current workflow. |
Codex
Use this skill when the user wants a deliberately independent second opinion instead of a continuation of the same reasoning path.
This port is adapted from garrytan/gstack at commit 4d2c8d94d00cc4f4f3d4c26316a4f939ceedc045.
Modes
REVIEW: pass/fail second review
CHALLENGE: adversarial attempt to break the current plan or code
CONSULT: focused consultation on a hard question
Workflow
- Choose the mode explicitly.
- Restate the work product or question under review.
- Re-check it from a different angle, reusing
cross-modal-review patterns when helpful.
- Report agreement, disagreement, and confidence clearly.
Guardrails
- Do not simply repeat the first analysis in softer words.
- Keep the second opinion meaningfully independent.
- If there is no real disagreement, say so plainly.