Skip to main content

rate-limiting-abuse-protection

Use when working on rate limiting, abuse prevention, anti-scraping, quota, and API protection design. Focus on fairness, tenant isolation, bypass resistance, and operational controls.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
Mr-Q526/TeamCC-Platform
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年4月15日 03:16
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
7
フォーク
1

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
4 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
schemaVersion
2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z
skillId
security/rate-limiting-abuse-protection
name
rate-limiting-abuse-protection
displayName
Rate Limiting Abuse Protection
description
Use when working on rate limiting, abuse prevention, anti-scraping, quota, and API protection design. Focus on fairness, tenant isolation, bypass resistance, and operational controls.
aliases
["rate-limiting-abuse-protection","Rate Limiting Abuse Protection","ratelimitingabuseprotection","限流","速率限制","rate limit","rate limiting","配额","rate","limiting","abuse","protection","限流防滥用","访问频率限制","abuse protection","配额保护"]
version
0.1.0
sourceHash
sha256:c0011ce5d4bfbc698d61e4eaeee5ff06c14d6aba636aa55d31e7746a55c84629
domain
security
departmentTags
["security-platform"]
sceneTags
["architecture","security-audit"]
# Rate Limiting Abuse Protection Use this skill when the task involves rate limiting, abuse prevention, anti-scraping, quota, and API protection design. Goal: produce reliable engineering guidance and implementation steps focused on fairness, tenant isolation, bypass resistance, and operational controls. ## Working model 1. Identify the affected system, data, users, and failure modes. 2. Define invariants, inputs, outputs, ownership, and rollback needs. 3. Prefer small, auditable changes with explicit validation. 4. Call out security, performance, concurrency, and data-loss risks when relevant. 5. Finish with concrete verification steps and residual risks. ## Rules - Ground recommendations in the current codebase or runtime evidence. - Prefer explicit contracts, typed boundaries, and defensive validation. - Do not hide operational concerns behind generic best practices. - Include negative cases, edge cases, and failure behavior. - For review tasks, list findings first with file and line references when possible. - For test or performance tasks, define the workload, success criteria, and measurement method. ## Checklist - Are assumptions and ownership boundaries explicit? - Are risky changes reversible or safely deployable? - Are observability and diagnostics sufficient for production issues? - Are tests or validation steps targeted to the actual risk? - Are security and data-integrity concerns addressed?
GitHubで見る