Skip to main content

security-vulnerability-check

Use when working on application security vulnerability checks for web apps, APIs, auth, data access, and secrets. Focus on exploitable flaws, secure defaults, input validation, and sensitive data exposure.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
Mr-Q526/TeamCC-Platform
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年4月15日 03:16
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
8
フォーク
1

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
4 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
schemaVersion
2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z
skillId
security/security-vulnerability-check
name
security-vulnerability-check
displayName
Security Vulnerability Check
description
Use when working on application security vulnerability checks for web apps, APIs, auth, data access, and secrets. Focus on exploitable flaws, secure defaults, input validation, and sensitive data exposure.
aliases
["security-vulnerability-check","Security Vulnerability Check","securityvulnerabilitycheck","漏洞","漏洞检查","安全漏洞","vulnerability","check","代码审查","code review","评审","安全漏洞检查"]
version
0.1.0
sourceHash
sha256:eb3d3240d8806e2b61661d4446d15f664ec26d6baea2b5e4ecf4af37c3da8050
domain
security
departmentTags
["security-platform"]
sceneTags
["security-audit","review"]
# Security Vulnerability Check Use this skill when the task involves application security vulnerability checks for web apps, APIs, auth, data access, and secrets. Goal: produce reliable engineering guidance and implementation steps focused on exploitable flaws, secure defaults, input validation, and sensitive data exposure. ## Working model 1. Identify the affected system, data, users, and failure modes. 2. Define invariants, inputs, outputs, ownership, and rollback needs. 3. Prefer small, auditable changes with explicit validation. 4. Call out security, performance, concurrency, and data-loss risks when relevant. 5. Finish with concrete verification steps and residual risks. ## Rules - Ground recommendations in the current codebase or runtime evidence. - Prefer explicit contracts, typed boundaries, and defensive validation. - Do not hide operational concerns behind generic best practices. - Include negative cases, edge cases, and failure behavior. - For review tasks, list findings first with file and line references when possible. - For test or performance tasks, define the workload, success criteria, and measurement method. ## Checklist - Are assumptions and ownership boundaries explicit? - Are risky changes reversible or safely deployable? - Are observability and diagnostics sufficient for production issues? - Are tests or validation steps targeted to the actual risk? - Are security and data-integrity concerns addressed?
GitHubで見る