github-cli

name	github-cli
description	Interact with the Safe-Synthesizer GitHub repository using the gh CLI. Activate when users want to list or create pull requests, check out PRs, work on someone else's PR, check CI status, investigate workflow failures, view job logs, create or triage issues, check review and approval status, manage releases, or inspect repo metadata. Trigger keywords - pull request, PR, issue, workflow, CI, actions, failed job, job log, release, review, approve, CODEOWNERS, labels, milestone, checkout, gh, GitHub.
license	Apache-2.0

GitHub CLI (gh)

Multi-step workflows (pre-merge checklist, debug CI, release, fetch and reply to PR comments): references/workflows.md.

Scripts

PR comments: use the CLI helper (PEP 723 + Typer + PyGithub + Pydantic). Run from repo root or from this skill directory. No gh binary required for fetch/reply (uses GitHub API with GITHUB_TOKEN or --token; optional fallback: gh auth token). If GITHUB_TOKEN is not set, run export GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token) before invoking the helper (or pass --token). Requires network; in Agent use required_permissions: ["all"] per sandbox behavior.

Path from repo root: .agents/skills/github-cli/scripts/gh_pr_helper.py (or scripts/gh_pr_helper.py if symlinked).

Command	Description
uv run --script .agents/skills/github-cli/scripts/gh_pr_helper.py -- comments [PR_NUMBER]	Fetch all PR comments (inline + top-level). Single JSON object to stdout: { "pr_number", "repo", "inline": [...], "top_level": [...] }. Omit PR to use current branch's open PR.
uv run --script .agents/skills/github-cli/scripts/gh_pr_helper.py -- reply <COMMENT_ID> "Reply body"	Post a reply to an inline review comment.
uv run --script ... -- reply <COMMENT_ID> --reply-file -	Reply body from stdin.
uv run --script ... -- reply <COMMENT_ID> --reply-file path/to/body.md	Reply body from file.

Draft the reply with the user in a file, then run with --reply-file path to post (avoids long inline strings).

Options (all commands): --repo OWNER/REPO (default: from git remote), --token / -t (default: GITHUB_TOKEN or gh auth token). Full workflow: references/workflows.md § Fetch and Address Review Comments.

Shell Permissions

Always use required_permissions: ["all"] when running gh commands. Sandboxed environments fail with TLS certificate errors (x509: OSStatus -26276).

Prefer && Chains

When running multiple sequential commands (pre-flight, commit, push, PR create), chain them with && in a single shell call. Only use separate calls when you need to read intermediate output before deciding the next step.

Pre-flight

Before any gh operation, verify the binary is available and authenticated:

export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH" && gh auth status

Pull Requests

# List open PRs
gh pr list
gh pr list --author=@me

# View PR details -- use --json to avoid GraphQL errors with deprecated fields
gh pr view <number> --json number,title,state,url,headRefName,baseRefName,isDraft,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,additions,deletions,changedFiles,reviews,labels,assignees,author \
  --jq '{number, title, state, url, branch: .headRefName, base: .baseRefName, draft: .isDraft, mergeable, reviewDecision, author: .author.login, additions, deletions, changedFiles, labels: [.labels[].name], checks: [.statusCheckRollup[] | {name: .name, status: .status, conclusion: .conclusion}], reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state: .state}]}'

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "Title" --body "Description"

# Check out a PR locally
gh pr checkout <number>

# Create a draft PR (WIP)
gh pr create --draft --title "Title" --body "Description"

# View PR diff
gh pr diff <number>

# Check if a PR already exists before creating -- use gh pr edit if it does
gh pr view --json number,url 2>/dev/null && echo "PR exists -- use gh pr edit" || echo "No PR yet"

# Edit an existing PR's title/body
gh pr edit <number> --title "New title" --body "New body"

# Commit, push, and create PR in one call
git add -A && git commit -s -S -m "feat: short title" \
  && git push -u origin HEAD \
  && gh pr create --draft --title "feat: short title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- ...
EOF
)"

Review Comments

gh pr view --json comments returns top-level PR conversation comments only. Inline code review comments require the REST API:

# Inline code review comments on a PR
gh api repos/NVIDIA-NeMo/Safe-Synthesizer/pulls/<number>/comments

# Issue discussion thread
gh api repos/NVIDIA-NeMo/Safe-Synthesizer/issues/<number>/comments

# Get a PR's base commit SHA (useful for lockfile diff diagnosis)
gh pr view <number> --json baseRefOid -q .baseRefOid

CI / Actions

The project has 7 GitHub Actions workflows:

Workflow	File	Trigger	Purpose
CI Checks	ci-checks.yml	push to main, PRs, manual	format, lint, typecheck, unit-test
GPU jobs	gpu-tests.yml	push to main, push to pull-request/<N>, manual	e2e on A100 (copy-pr-bot; see below)
Conventional Commit	conventional-commit.yml	PR title changes	Validates PR title format
DCO Assistant	dco-assistant.yml	PR events, comments	Developer Certificate of Origin
Release	release.yml	manual dispatch only	Build and publish to PyPI
Secrets Detector	secrets-detector.yml	PRs to main	Scans for leaked secrets

GPU tests use the copy-pr-bot pattern: they do NOT fire on pull_request events. Instead, copy-pr-bot pushes PR content to a pull-request/<N> branch, which triggers the workflow via a push event. To manually trigger GPU tests on a PR, comment /sync on the PR. See the copy-pr-bot docs.

# Check CI status + recent runs in one call
gh pr checks && gh run list --limit 5

# When you have a run ID (e.g. from a URL like .../actions/runs/<run-id>/job/<job-id>):
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

# Find latest failure on current branch (when no run ID given)
RUN_ID=$(gh run list --branch="$(git branch --show-current)" --status=failure --limit=1 --json databaseId -q '.[0].databaseId') \
  && [ "$RUN_ID" != "null" ] && gh run view "$RUN_ID" --log-failed

# Re-run failed jobs only
gh run rerun <run-id> --failed

CI jobs map to local commands:

CI Job	Local Command
Format	mise run format (fix) or mise run format-check (check)
Format (lock)	mise run lock-check
Typecheck	mise run typecheck
Unit Tests	mise run test:ci

Path filtering may skip format/typecheck/unit-test when only non-source files change. Run mise run validate locally or add a relevant source/test/config change to trigger CI.

Issues

gh issue list
gh issue view <number>
gh issue create --title "Title" --body "Description"
gh issue edit <number> --body "Updated body"

Issue templates: bug-report, feature-request, development-task (use gh issue create for interactive prompt).

Code Review

# List reviews on a PR
gh pr view <number> --json reviews

# Approve
gh pr review <number> --approve

# Request changes
gh pr review <number> --request-changes --body "feedback"

Releases

gh release list
gh release view <tag>

# Trigger release workflow (dry run first)
gh workflow run release.yml \
  -f release-ref=<full-sha-or-tag> \
  -f dry-run=true \
  -f create-gh-release=true \
  -f version-bump-branch=<branch>

CODEOWNERS

Defined in .github/CODEOWNERS:

• All files: @NVIDIA-NeMo/safe-synthesizer-maintainers
• src/ and tests/: @NVIDIA-NeMo/safe-synthesizer-reviewers
• Critical files (pyproject.toml, uv.lock, SECURITY.md, LICENSE, .github/): @NVIDIA-NeMo/safe-synthesizer-maintainers

gh pr edit <number> --add-reviewer NVIDIA-NeMo/safe-synthesizer-reviewers

Writing PR and Issue Bodies

Always use HEREDOC for multiline bodies:

gh pr create --title "feat: short title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- 2-4 bullet points, not a full audit

## Test plan
- [ ] Verify X
- [ ] Check Y
EOF
)"

Keep bodies concise -- 2-4 bullet summary for PRs, problem + options for issues. Don't generate long audit dumps or parameter inventories. When the user asks for "succinct" -- 1-3 sentences, no lists. For issues meant for team discussion, keep options human-readable and decision-focused, not implementation inventories.

No decorative bold (**text**) in PR or issue bodies. No per-file change inventories. No ## Why sections that restate the commit message. Default to the shortest body that answers "what changed and how to verify it."

Common Mistakes

• Don't run gh run view <id> and gh run view <id> --log-failed as separate calls -- go straight to --log-failed when you already have the run ID
• Don't WebFetch GitHub Actions URLs for private repos -- returns 404; use gh run view <run-id> --log-failed instead
• Don't propose gh pr create without checking if a PR already exists first -- use gh pr edit if it does
• Don't generate long PR/issue bodies -- users consistently ask agents to cut them down; 2-4 bullets max, no audit dumps
• Don't use separate shell calls for git push then gh pr create -- chain them with &&
• Don't manually write Signed-off-by in commit messages -- always use git commit --signoff --gpg-sign (-s -S) so the trailer matches git config user.name / user.email and the commit is cryptographically signed; DCO probot and signature verification both require exact identity match
• Don't use plain gh pr view <number> -- use --json form to avoid GraphQL errors about deprecated Projects (classic)