- name
- apify-content-analytics
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent apify content analytics with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"apify-content-analytics, apify content analytics, how do i apify-content-analytics, orchestrate apify-content-analytics, automate apify-content-analytics, agent apify-content-analytics","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Apify Content Analytics
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for apify content analytics workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def analyze_apify_content_metrics(
actor_id: str,
run_id: str,
api_token: str,
metrics_config: Dict[str, Any]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Fetch and analyze content metrics from an Apify actor run.
Implements Law 2 (Parse at boundary) by validating Apify API inputs
and Law 3 (Atomic Predictability) by returning fresh metric objects.
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not actor_id or not run_id:
raise ValueError("actor_id and run_id are required for content analysis")
# Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2)
client = ApifyClient(api_token)
run = client.actor(actor_id).run(run_id)
# Fetch dataset items with pagination handling
items = []
cursor = None
while True:
page = run.dataset().list_items(limit=100, cursor=cursor)
items.extend(page.get("items", []))
if not page.get("hasMore"):
break
cursor = page.get("cursor")
# Calculate domain-specific metrics
content_metrics = {
"total_items": len(items),
"avg_readability": _calculate_readability(items),
"sentiment_distribution": _compute_sentiment(items),
"engagement_score": _compute_engagement(items, metrics_config)
}
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new structure
return {
"actor_id": actor_id,
"run_id": run_id,
"metrics": content_metrics,
"analysis_timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"confidence": 0.95 if len(items) > 50 else 0.75
}
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_content_analysis_with_fallback(
actor_id: str,
input_params: Dict[str, Any],
fallback_actors: List[str],
api_token: str
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute Apify content analysis with domain-specific fallback chain.
Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4) for Apify API errors.
Fallback chain: 1. Retry run 2. Try alternative actor 3. Return cached metrics
"""
# Guard clause - validate actor exists (Early Exit)
if not _validate_actor_availability(actor_id, api_token):
raise ValueError(f"Actor {actor_id} is unavailable or invalid")
client = ApifyClient(api_token)
actor = client.actor(actor_id)
for attempt in range(3):
try:
# Execute actor with input parameters
run = actor.run(input_params)
run.wait_for_finish(timeout=300)
# Parse output - Ensure trusted state (Law 2)
dataset_items = run.dataset().list_items().get("items", [])
if not dataset_items:
raise ValueError("Actor returned empty dataset")
# Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
return {
"success": True,
"actor_executed": actor_id,
"run_id": run.id,
"metrics": _compute_analytics(dataset_items),
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": run.metrics.get("ACTOR_RUN_DURATION_MILLIS", 0)
}
except ApifyApiError as e:
# Fail Fast - Don't retry on auth/permission errors (Law 4)
if e.status_code in (401, 403, 404):
raise ValueError(f"Apify API error: {e.message}") from e
# Transient error (rate limit, timeout) - retry
if attempt == 2:
return _apply_apify_fallback(actor_id, fallback_actors, input_params, api_token)
# All retries exhausted - Fail Loud (Law 4)
raise ValueError(f"Content analysis failed after 3 attempts for {actor_id}")
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Content Analytics Framework (Gartner)](<https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/content-analytics>)
- [Google Analytics Documentation](<https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1008010>)
- [Text Mining and NLP Overview (Wikipedia)](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_mining>)
- [Content Performance Metrics Guide](<https://neilpatel.com/blog/content-marketing-metrics/>)
- [Natural Language Processing with Python (NLTK Book)](<https://www.nltk.org/book/>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
GitHubで見る