scorecard-matrix

name	scorecard-matrix
description	Generates a polished, self-contained HTML heatmap scorecard — a weighted comparison matrix where entities (rows) are scored across dimensions (columns), with computed totals, rank badges, and a winner highlight. Use when asked to build a scorecard, comparison matrix, decision matrix, vendor evaluation, tool assessment, candidate scoring grid, competitive analysis, site-readiness matrix, or any weighted multi-criteria ranking. Interviews the user if entities or criteria are missing, constructs a validated JSON document, then renders it into a sandbox-safe HTML file using the component library. No external dependencies — output runs inside a SharePoint sandboxed iframe.
metadata	{"author":"zrosenfield"}

Scorecard Matrix

Generates a complete, self-contained HTML scorecard by (1) interviewing the user or parsing their data, (2) constructing and validating a JSON document, then (3) rendering that JSON into HTML using assets/scorecard-matrix-template.html. The JSON is the authoritative source of truth; the HTML is fully determined by it.

---

Step 1: Determine the Data Source

Check what the user has already provided before asking anything:

• SharePoint list or table: Parse all rows. Identify entities (the things being compared) and scoring columns (the dimensions).
• CSV or table pasted in chat: Extract entities, dimension names, and scores directly. Do not ask for data you already have.
• Verbal description only: Proceed to Step 2.

---

Step 2: Interview the User

If the data or intent is not fully clear, ask these questions in a single message — not one at a time:

1. What are you comparing? List the entities: vendors, tools, candidates, sites, products, options. (2–10 items.)
2. What are the criteria? List the dimensions you are scoring against: features, cost, fit, support, risk, readiness, etc. (2–10 items.)
3. Weights: How important is each dimension relative to the others? Can be given as percentages (must sum to 100%), ratios (e.g. 3:2:1), or plain priority ranking. The skill normalizes to decimals summing to 1.0.
4. Scores: For each entity × dimension cell: what is the score? Use whichever scale feels natural — the skill will ask you to confirm the scale (1–5 or 1–10). If scores come from data, extract them. If from judgment, prompt the user to rate each combination.
5. Cell notes: For any cell, is there a short phrase (under 6 words) that explains the score? Optional but valuable.
6. Context sentence: One or two sentences describing the decision being made, the audience, and the date or period.
7. Palette: Warm paper (cream/terra-cotta), deep ink (dark/gold), clean white (white/green), or slate (gray/blue)? Default to warm paper.

Confirm your understanding of the full matrix before building the JSON.

---

Step 3: Normalize Weights

Weights must sum to exactly 1.0. Apply these rules:

• Percentages given: divide each by 100. Check sum = 1.0. If not, normalize: w_i = raw_i / sum(raw).
• Ratios given (e.g. 3:2:2:1): w_i = ratio_i / sum(ratios).
• Priority ranking only: assign equal weight: w_i = 1 / N where N = number of dimensions.
• Weights already decimal: verify sum. If off by ≤ 0.01 due to rounding, adjust the largest weight to compensate.

Always document the normalized weights in the JSON and show the user before rendering.

---

Step 4: Choose the Scoring Scale

Default to 1–5 unless:

• The user provides scores already on a 1–10 scale, or
• There are 8+ dimensions and fine-grained differentiation matters.

When prompting the user to rate cells manually, describe each anchor:

• 1–5 scale: 1 = very poor fit, 3 = adequate, 5 = exceptional.
• 1–10 scale: 1 = unacceptable, 5 = meets minimum bar, 10 = best in class.

---

Step 5: Build and Validate the JSON Document

Construct the JSON object. Read references/components.md for the full schema and computation rules.

Top-level structure:

{
  "report": {
    "title": "CRM Platform Evaluation",
    "subtitle": "Q2 2026 · Vendor Selection",
    "context": "Evaluating five CRM platforms for the SMB sales team...",
    "palette": "warm-paper",
    "footer": "Generated May 28, 2026 · 5 vendors · 6 dimensions"
  },
  "scale": 5,
  "dimensions": [...],
  "entities": [...]
}

Computed fields (the skill must calculate these before rendering):

• weighted_total per entity = sum(score_d × weight_d) for all dimensions d
• rank per entity = 1-based position sorted by weighted_total descending; ties share the lower rank number
• column_avg per dimension = average score across all entities (round to 1 decimal)

Validation Checklist

Run every check before rendering. Fix any failure before proceeding.

Document level:

• report.palette is one of: warm-paper, deep-ink, clean-white, slate
• scale is 5 or 10
• dimensions array has 2–10 items
• entities array has 2–10 items
• All dimension weight values are decimals; they sum to 1.0 (± 0.005 tolerance for rounding)
• Every dimension has a unique id
• Every entity has a unique id

Per entity:

• scores object has a key for every dimension id
• Every score value is a number in range [1, scale]
• weighted_total has been computed and rounded to 2 decimal places
• rank has been assigned (1 = best)

Per dimension:

• column_avg has been computed
• weight is a number in (0, 1]

---

Step 6: Render the HTML

1. Read assets/scorecard-matrix-template.html.
2. Replace {{REPORT_TITLE}} in <title> with a concise page title.
3. Replace {{PALETTE_CLASS}} on <body> with palette- + the palette name.
4. Generate the header HTML (.rpt-header + .sc-title-block) and replace {{HEADER}}.
5. Generate the full matrix table HTML and replace {{MATRIX}}. See references/components.md for the matrix structure, heatmap cell style computation, rank badge HTML, and averages row.
6. Generate the rankings callout HTML and replace {{RANKINGS}}.
7. Generate the dimension weights note HTML and replace {{WEIGHTS_NOTE}}.
8. Replace {{FOOTER}} with the footer text.
9. Deliver the complete file as the response. No prose outside the file.

Heatmap Cell Style Computation

For each score cell, compute a background color based on the normalized score. Read references/design-system.md for the exact hex values per palette tier. The formula:

t = (score - 1) / (scale - 1)   // normalized 0.0–1.0
tier: t < 0.35  → low  (cool tint toward negative)
      t ≥ 0.65  → high (warm tint toward accent)
      else      → mid  (surface, neutral)

Emit the computed hex directly as an inline style="background:{{HEX}}" on each score cell. No JS is needed — the page is fully readable with scripts disabled.

---

Hard Constraints

• No external URLs, CDN links, or web fonts in the output HTML.
• No <script src> tags. All JavaScript must be inline.
• All data values must be pre-rendered into the HTML — the page must be fully correct with JavaScript disabled.
• Do not generate Python, PowerShell, or any other scripts — output is always the HTML file.
• Do not render until the validation checklist passes.
• Follow the no-Person-column-type rule for any accompanying SharePoint schema: use text columns only.