- name
- technical-writing
- description
- Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles.
- category
- communication
- priority
- medium
- tokenEstimate
- 800
- agents
- ["qe-quality-analyzer","qe-api-contract-validator"]
- implementation_status
- optimized
- optimization_version
- 1
- last_optimized
- 2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z
- dependencies
- []
- quick_reference_card
- true
- tags
- ["writing","documentation","communication","blogs","tutorials"]
- trust_tier
- 1
- validation
- {"schema_path":"schemas/output.json","eval_path":"evals/technical-writing.yaml"}
# Technical Writing
<default_to_action>
When writing technical content:
1. LEAD with value (what will reader learn/gain?)
2. SHOW, don't tell (specific examples, code, and numbers you measured or can source)
3. STRUCTURE for scanning (headers, bold, short paragraphs)
4. CUT ruthlessly (every sentence must earn its place)
5. BE honest about trade-offs
6. NEVER invent figures: every number, duration, and date traces to a source (tracker, benchmark, PR, release note). Missing a number? Write `[number?]` and ask, or describe what changed without one.
**Blog Post Structure:**
```markdown
# Title (specific promise)
## Opening (2-3 paragraphs)
- Hook: The problem or insight
- Context: Why this matters
- Promise: What they'll learn
## Body (3-5 sections)
- One clear idea per section
- Support with examples/code/data
## Closing
- Key takeaway (1-2 sentences)
- Action reader can take
```
**Before/After:**
❌ "We implemented a comprehensive testing strategy..."
✅ "We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement."
</default_to_action>
## Quick Reference Card
### Core Principles
| Principle | Bad | Good |
|-----------|-----|------|
| **Lead with value** | "In today's landscape..." | "Here's what changed when we moved testing into refinement" |
| **Show, don't tell** | "We improved testing" | "Bugs found per sprint, before and after, from our tracker: [before]→[after]" |
| **Be specific** | "Performance improved" | "p95 response time before and after, with how and where it was measured" |
| **Honest trade-offs** | "This approach is best" | "TDD slowed our first features; here is what we got back, with the numbers we measured" |
| **Source every figure** | "Coverage jumped 40%" (from memory) | The figure plus where it came from, or no figure at all |
Bracketed values are placeholders for your own measured data. Never fill them with plausible-sounding numbers.
### Words to Cut
| Kill | Reason |
|------|--------|
| basically, actually, probably | Hedge words |
| leverage, synergy, paradigm | Corporate speak |
| very, really, quite | Unnecessary qualifiers |
| it should be noted that | Just note it |
---
## Audience-Specific Writing
### For Developers
- Lead with code or concrete problem
- Show implementation details
- Discuss trade-offs and alternatives
- Link to repos or examples
### For QA/QE
- Start with testing challenge
- Show strategy, not just tools
- Include risk assessment
- Provide adaptable heuristics
### For Leadership
- Open with business impact
- Use metrics that matter
- Connect technical to outcomes
- Keep technical details concise
---
## Editing Checklist
Before publishing:
- [ ] Title promises something specific
- [ ] Opening hooks in 30 seconds
- [ ] Claims backed by examples
- [ ] Every number, duration, and date traced to a source (or removed)
- [ ] All unnecessary words cut
- [ ] Code examples tested and correct
- [ ] Takeaway crystal clear
- [ ] Would send to respected colleague
---
## Example Transformations
**Before:**
"We decided to implement a more comprehensive testing strategy that would allow us to catch bugs earlier in the development lifecycle."
**After:**
"We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement, identifying risks before code is written."
---
**Before:**
"The benefits of this approach are numerous and include improved quality, faster feedback loops, and better team collaboration."
**After:**
"Three outcomes: bugs now surface during refinement instead of after merge, the regression suite stopped growing with every release, and developers ask QE for input during design." (Add figures only if you measured them, and say where they came from.)
---
## Agent Integration
```typescript
// Generate documentation from code
const docs = await Task("Generate Docs", {
source: 'src/services/PaymentService.ts',
format: 'markdown',
includeExamples: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
// Review documentation quality
const review = await Task("Review Docs", {
files: ['README.md', 'docs/api.md'],
checkClarity: true,
checkCodeExamples: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
```
---
## Agent Coordination Hints
### Memory Namespace
```
aqe/technical-writing/
├── generated-docs/* - Auto-generated documentation
├── reviews/* - Documentation review findings
└── templates/* - Reusable doc templates
```
### Fleet Coordination
```typescript
const docsFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'documentation',
agents: [
'qe-quality-analyzer', // Generate and review
'qe-api-contract-validator' // API doc accuracy
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
```
---
## Related Skills
- [bug-reporting-excellence](../bug-reporting-excellence/) - Technical bug writing
- [code-review-quality](../code-review-quality/) - Review documentation
---
## Remember
**You're not writing to impress.** You're writing to help people solve problems you've already solved. Be the colleague you wish you'd had.
**Write from experience.** Only write about what you've done in production. If exploring, say so.
GitHubで見る