checklist-auditor

# Checklist auditor skill When asked to audit checklists against a standard: 1. Use `read_file` to read the corporate standard checklist — this is the reference against which all others are compared 2. Extract the canonical list of steps, grouping them by phase or category if the standard uses phases (e.g., "Day 1-7", "Week 2-4", "Day 60-90") 3. For each department checklist: - Use `read_file` to read the checklist - Compare each step against the standard - Classify each step as: - **Present**: matches the standard (exact or equivalent) - **Modified**: present but differs in wording, scope, or timing - **Missing**: not present in this checklist - **Extra**: present in this checklist but not in the standard 4. Produce an audit report with two sections: **Summary table:** | Department | Present | Modified | Missing | Extra | Score | |------------|---------|----------|---------|-------|-------| **Detail per department** (only for departments with issues): - List each Missing step with the standard's wording - List each Modified step with both versions side by side - List each Extra step — these may be legitimate additions that should be considered for the standard 5. If requested, provide recommendations: - Steps that should be added to the standard (extras that appear in multiple departments) - Steps that may be outdated (missing from most departments) 6. Use `write_file` to save the audit report if requested ## Important guidelines - Treat equivalent steps as matches even if wording differs — focus on intent, not exact text - When a checklist uses different phase names but covers the same time period, align by timing rather than labels - Flag contradictions (e.g., department A says "notify within 24h" but the standard says "notify within 48h") as Modified, not Present - Do not assume Missing steps are wrong — the department may have a valid reason. Present findings, let the reviewer decide