arxiv-daily

name	arxiv-daily
description	Run the daily arXiv workflow for this project: fetch a date/category batch, recommend papers against the local user profile, perform selective close reading, check missing citations, use cautious gated research-idea generation, and write user-facing reports with citation-email drafts.

arXiv Daily

Use this skill for daily arXiv recommendations, close reading, cautious gated idea generation, or citation checks.

Inputs

• Date, defaulting to the current local date.
• arXiv categories, defaulting to quant-ph.
• Mode: recommend or recommend+citation_check.
• Local profile files:
  • user_profile/research_interests.local.md
  • user_profile/papers.local.jsonl

Core Rules

• Read the local profile before ranking. Use it for active topics, lower-priority topics, methods, citation anchors, email additions, and negative preferences. Do not hard-code one user's current topics in this skill.
• If the profile is absent or incomplete, ask targeted questions instead of inventing durable preferences.
• Rank by concrete value to the user, not broad keyword overlap.
• Never invent papers. Load the fetched JSON, extract actual IDs, and verify every referenced paper exists in the source data before recommending, inspecting, or reporting it.
• Recommend up to 10 papers, but do not pad weak matches or list non-recommended papers unless the user asks for diagnostics.
• Generate both Markdown and HTML reports by default unless the user explicitly asks for only one format.
• Markdown reports are English by default unless the user explicitly asks for another Markdown language. If the user gives the daily-scan request in Chinese, keep Markdown reports in English by default.
• HTML reports should optimize readability for the user's request language. If the user gives the daily-scan request in Chinese, write the HTML report UI text and summaries in Chinese by default while preserving paper titles, author names, arXiv IDs, and email drafts in their natural/original language.
• Do not spawn subagents, paper workers, or other delegated agents unless the user explicitly asks for subagents, delegation, parallel agents, or worker-based inspection in the current request. Depth, thoroughness, a full run, or daily recommendations do not count as permission to spawn subagents.

Fetching And Paths

Fetch metadata with the project CLI. The normal command is:

.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily fetch --date YYYY-MM-DD --category quant-ph --source auto

--source auto is required for ordinary daily runs: it tries the arXiv API first and, if that fails due to network instability, HTTP errors, rate limiting, or XML/parser errors, falls back to scraping the arXiv web search result page directly.

Use these explicit variants when diagnosing fetch behavior:

.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily fetch --date YYYY-MM-DD --category quant-ph --source api

.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily fetch --date YYYY-MM-DD --category quant-ph --source html

--source api means arXiv API only. --source html means skip the API and read arxiv.org HTML search results directly. Use the HTML command as the manual fallback when the API is flaky but the arXiv website is reachable.

For a non-network preview of the output path and API query:

.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily fetch --date YYYY-MM-DD --category quant-ph --source auto --dry-run

If the requested local date is fetched successfully and returns zero papers, check adjacent submitted dates and use the latest non-empty batch. Always state the date convention explicitly.

Do not use adjacent-date fallback for fetch failures until both the API attempt and the arxiv.org HTML fallback fail. If --source auto or the explicit --source html fallback still fails because of rate limiting, network errors, HTTP errors, parser errors, page-structure changes, or other non-zero command failures, report the failure directly to the user, including the requested date/category and the concrete error when available. Do not substitute a cached or adjacent-date batch unless the user explicitly asks for that fallback after seeing the failure.

When the HTML fallback is used, treat the generated JSON cache as the source of truth for recommendation work, but record in Run Metadata that the metadata source was html and that arXiv API fallback occurred. The HTML fallback uses arXiv submitted-date filtering and then verifies each parsed result against the requested submitted date; do not recommend any paper unless it appears in the generated JSON cache.

All generated paths use the arXiv source/fetch date, not the agent run date. For example, if the run date is 2026-05-21 but the latest non-empty batch is submittedDate=2026-05-15, all paths use 2026-05-15.

Before starting metadata ranking, source inspection, citation checks, or report generation, check whether the resolved source date and category already have a recommendation report. If data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/recommendations.md or data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/recommendations.html exists and run_metadata.json identifies the same source_date and category, treat that batch as already processed. For an ordinary repeated daily request, stop after verifying the requested date has no new papers and tell the user that the latest non-empty batch already has a report, with links to the existing files. Do not reread, re-rank, redownload, or overwrite the report. Only rerun the workflow when the user explicitly requests a refresh, re-audit, updated citation check, or another material change, or when the existing report is incomplete or its metadata does not match the resolved batch.

Required path structure:

• Metadata JSON: data/raw/arxiv/YYYY-MM-DD/quant-ph.json or another category filename.
• Source files: data/raw/arxiv/YYYY-MM-DD/sources/ARXIV_ID/.
• Recommendation report: data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/recommendations.md.
• HTML recommendation report: data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/recommendations.html.
• Citation alerts: data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/citation_alerts.md.
• Report metadata: data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/run_metadata.json.
• Persistent idea log: user_profile/ideas.local.jsonl.

Downloading And Extracting Sources

To programmatically download specific paper sources (source preferred, fallback to PDF) and extract/unpack them into the raw folder:

# Download and extract one or more specific paper IDs
.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily download ARXIV_ID [ARXIV_ID ...]

Options:

• --date: Target arXiv submitted date, YYYY-MM-DD. If omitted, the CLI auto-resolves the paper's date by checking local metadata JSON caches first, and queries the arXiv API as a fallback.
• --delay-seconds: Delay in seconds between sequential downloads to prevent rate limits (defaults to 3.0).
• --dry-run: Preview download actions without calling the network.

Staged Recommendation Workflow

Use this workflow for accuracy and token efficiency:

1. Metadata pass: rank all cached papers using only metadata fields from the fetched JSON. The abstract text is stored under the summary key, not abstract; use title, summary, categories, authors, and comment. Verify all referenced IDs against the fetched JSON.
2. Candidate selection: choose roughly 5-12 promising papers plus strong citation-check suspects. Do not fill a quota with weak papers.
3. Source acquisition and inspection: the main agent downloads or reuses selected candidates' source/full text when needed using the CLI download command, then applies the progressive gates locally. If subagents are explicitly requested, workers may own source acquisition for their assigned papers. To reduce repeated permission prompts, the main agent may prefetch sources for the bounded candidate set before spawning workers, but should not require this when worker-side source acquisition is more natural. If, and only if, the user explicitly requests subagents or worker-based parallel inspection, spawn one paper worker per selected candidate whenever subagents are supported by the active session.
4. Final aggregation: combine the gathered evidence into one unified ranking. The main agent decides final order and writes the user-facing reports. When explicit paper workers were used, aggregate their evidence instead of treating their output as final.

Paper workers are optional, not the default. Do not spawn workers for ordinary daily-run, full-run, or quick-diagnostic requests unless the user explicitly asks for subagents, delegation, parallel agents, or workers. When workers are explicitly requested, do not spawn workers for every fetched paper; only use the bounded candidate set selected after the metadata pass.

Main-Agent Responsibilities

• Read the profile and perform the metadata-only ranking over all cached papers.
• Select the bounded candidate paper set for source/full-text inspection.
• Download or inspect candidate sources locally unless the user explicitly requested subagents.
• When subagents are requested, decide explicitly whether sources are prefetched by the main agent or acquired by workers. If workers should download, say so in the worker prompt and constrain downloads to the assigned arXiv source/PDF only.
• If the user explicitly requested subagents and they are supported, spawn workers in parallel, assigning exactly one paper to each worker.
• Use templates/paper_subagent_prompt.md only when calling explicitly requested subagents.
• Continue non-overlapping work while explicitly requested workers inspect sources.
• Verify citation-email evidence before including it in citation_alerts.md.
• Follow the same staged gates locally within the main agent whenever workers are not explicitly requested, unavailable, or failed.

Optional Paper-Worker Subagent Responsibilities

This section applies only when the user explicitly requested subagents, delegation, parallel agents, or worker-based paper inspection in the current request.

• Handle exactly one paper and return structured evidence, not a polished report.
• Apply progressive gates: relevance first, citation check only if strongly related, close reading only if genuinely promising.
• Stop early for weak or merely keyword-level matches and return a short low-priority assessment.
• Own source/full-text acquisition for the assigned paper when it is needed for close reading or citation checks. Reuse an existing SOURCE_TREE first; otherwise download and extract the assigned arXiv source or PDF into data/raw/arxiv/YYYY-MM-DD/sources/ARXIV_ID/ using the CLI command: .conda/arxiv-daily/bin/arxiv-daily download ARXIV_ID.
• Do not install packages, use browser automation, or access unrelated network resources. If a download command needs approval, request only the minimal arXiv source/PDF fetch for the assigned paper.
• Inspect .tex, .bbl, and .bib snippets with rg; avoid loading whole source trees.
• For long LaTeX projects, read targeted sections only: abstract, introduction, main results or theorem statements, discussion/conclusion, figure captions, bibliography, and relevant appendix snippets.

Close Reading And Ideas

For top-ranked papers, read source, abstract page, or full text when possible. The strongest entries should usually get two to three paragraphs explaining:

• What the paper actually does.
• Why it matches the user's profile.
• Which user paper, method, software, or theme it connects to.
• Whether it suggests a concrete future direction.

Use shorter summaries for weaker matches or when the abstract is sufficient.

Default to generating no research idea on a daily run. Idea generation is an exceptional outcome, not a quota and not a daily requirement. Only propose or persist an idea when the paper appears genuinely high-value after close reading and the idea passes a stricter value, feasibility, and novelty check.

Before generating an idea, do a dedicated idea-gating pass:

• Read the new paper beyond metadata: inspect the source/PDF sections needed to understand the mechanism, assumptions, limitations, and evidence. Usually inspect the abstract, introduction, main result/method section, experiments or derivations, discussion/conclusion, and relevant figures/tables or appendices.
• Read the relevant local profile material, not just the broad profile summary. Check research_interests.local.md, matching records in papers.local.jsonl, existing ideas.local.jsonl, and any related data/notes/ARXIV_ID.md notes or prior recommendation reports when they exist.
• Compare the proposed idea against the user's related prior work and existing idea log. Do not create near-duplicates, generic continuations, or ideas that only rename an existing proposal.
• Assess feasibility concretely: identify the first calculation, simulation, derivation, dataset, benchmark, observable, or software prototype; check that it fits the user's practical methods such as TensorCircuit/TensorCircuit-NG, tensor networks, Clifford/stabilizer numerics, VQA/QML workflows, or analytical derivation.
• Assess novelty concretely: explain why the combination is not a routine application of the paper's own setup or a generic "apply to nearby model" extension. Prefer crossed A-plus-B combinations where the new paper supplies a mechanism or method and the user's profile supplies a distinct system, diagnostic, software route, or prior result.
• If any of value, feasibility, or novelty is uncertain after this pass, do not create a persistent idea. Mention at most a tentative reading note in the recommendation text, clearly marked as not promoted to ideas.local.jsonl.

Good ideas combine the new paper's system, technique, or observation with a user-specific method, prior work, setup, or implementation route. Avoid generic extensions such as adding noise, changing systems, or doing larger numerics without a concrete nontrivial reason.

Idea records should be specific enough to retrieve and refine later. Define the proposed diagnostic, model, comparison class, observable, or first calculation instead of only naming a broad theme. Include evidence from the gating pass in notes or another concise field: cite the recommendation report date plus the inspected paper section, local note, related prior user paper, existing idea comparison, or source snippet that supports feasibility and novelty.

When a high-value idea is included and persistent idea tracking exists or is requested, append a concise record to user_profile/ideas.local.jsonl using user_profile/ideas.example.jsonl as the schema:

• source_arxiv_ids
• summary
• user_connection
• novelty_reason
• actionability
• status, starting as proposed

Do not promote rejected, weak, duplicate, or merely plausible ideas into ideas.local.jsonl or durable profile preferences. Update research_interests.local.md from idea feedback only when it reveals a stable preference.

Citation Checks

Run citation checks only for strongly related papers. Search source .tex, .bbl, and .bib files when available, using user anchor papers, user-name variants, software/project names, topic phrases, and other anchors from the profile.

Create citation emails only when all three conditions hold:

• Direct method/software reuse: the paper uses the same method, algorithm, or software framework the user developed.
• Same-problem-space relation: the paper directly builds on, extends, compares against, or competes with the user's work in the same technical setting.
• Obvious missing citation: a domain expert would expect the user's work as a standard reference for that specific method or problem.

Do not create citation alerts for broad keyword overlap, indirect conceptual relevance, or different implementations/frameworks unless the user's framework is the standard tool for that task.

Profile-specific citation rules may strengthen these defaults. If the local profile says a field-originating paper is a priority anchor, follow that rule. For QAS, when the profile identifies "Differentiable quantum architecture search" as the first work to introduce the QAS concept, treat papers that propose, use, survey, benchmark, or position quantum architecture search or AutoML/NAS-style quantum circuit architecture design without citing DQAS as likely Needs Email, unless the mention is only incidental.

For every missing-citation alert, include:

• Concrete technical relation to one or more user anchor papers.
• Source-level reference or bibliography search evidence when available.
• A short uncertainty note when the judgment is conceptual rather than direct software/method reuse or concept similarity.

Citation reports contain only:

• Needs Email
• Already Cites User Work: No Email Needed

Do not mention papers that neither need an email nor already cite relevant user work.

Citation Email Style

• Bibliographic Integrity: To prevent hallucination of author names, publications, or journals in the email drafts, the agent MUST explicitly lookup the exact bibliographic metadata of the relevant prior paper from user_profile/papers.local.jsonl (using a keyword or title query) rather than relying on parametric memory.

Before drafting, extract public contact emails from the paper source or text when available. Search .tex, .bbl, .bib, and extracted PDF text for \email{...}, mailto:, email, corresponding author, and raw email patterns. Do not search for private contact information outside the paper/source unless the user explicitly asks.

Put the best public contact above the draft:

To: [e-mail]

Prefer corresponding-author or \email{...} addresses. If several emails are found and no corresponding author is clear, list them all or choose the most likely contact and note the evidence in Run Metadata.

Use this default subject with the target paper's bare arXiv ID:

On your work arXiv:XXXX.XXXXX

Use this default salutation unless a specific recipient is known:

Dear colleagues,

Emails should be concise, courteous, professional, and usually indirect:

• Open with With great interest, I read... and name a concrete technical point from the target paper.
• Do not explicitly say overlap, overlaps with our work, or similar direct phrasing in the email body.
• Instead, describe the target paper's theme or technical emphasis, then introduce the user's related work as complementary context, a potentially useful reference, or an additional perspective.
• Prefer phrases such as related context, complementary perspective, may provide a useful angle, or in case it is helpful for a future version.
• Avoid directly asking for a citation unless the omission is exceptionally central and obvious.
• Prefer wording such as may be useful, might be relevant, or in case it is helpful for a future version.
• Include profile-defined topic or software email additions when relevant.
• For QAS-related emails, if the local profile specifies DQAS as the first paper to introduce quantum architecture search, explicitly say this in the draft while keeping the tone courteous. Example: To the best of my knowledge, our DQAS paper was the first work to introduce the quantum architecture search (QAS) concept, and it may provide useful background for your discussion.

Report Format

User-facing reports start with useful results, not metadata.

Generate Markdown and HTML reports in parallel unless the user explicitly asks for only one format. Use the embedded template at templates/daily_report_template.html as the only source of truth for the HTML visual structure and styling. The generated HTML should be plain static HTML with no external JavaScript or remote assets.

Language defaults:

• Markdown recommendations.md and citation_alerts.md: English by default, including when the user request is in Chinese, unless the user explicitly asks for Chinese Markdown.
• HTML recommendations.html: follow the user's request language for readability. For Chinese daily-scan requests, use Chinese section labels, priority labels, action labels, and recommendation prose; keep paper titles, author names, arXiv IDs, technical terms where clearer, and citation email drafts in their natural/original language.

HTML recommendation report requirements:

• Write data/reports/YYYY-MM-DD/recommendations.html.
• Set the HTML document title and main <h1> to Everyday arXiv 推荐.
• Include a top-list table before detailed paper cards.
• Use bare arXiv IDs without version suffixes in HTML visible text and same-page anchors, for example 2605.22555, href="#paper-2605-22555", and id="paper-2605-22555".
• Include direct arXiv links for every recommended paper, normally https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID and a PDF link https://arxiv.org/pdf/ARXIV_ID, using the bare ID without vN.
• Include priority/action badges such as high, medium, low, or citation alert; do not overstate priority for weak matches.
• Include the sparse research-idea box only when there is a genuinely high-value idea.
• Do not put run metadata, source cache, profile files, or date-convention notes at the bottom of HTML reports. Keep provenance in Markdown Run Metadata sections and/or run_metadata.json.

HTML citation report requirements:

• Do not create a separate HTML citation report by default. If citation alerts exist, merge them into recommendations.html as a citation-alert section.
• Include arXiv links for each cited target paper and same-page anchors from any citation-alert summary to the detailed citation card, using bare arXiv IDs without version suffixes in visible text and anchors.
• Keep HTML citation-alert prose concise: say that the relevant user work is not cited and why the target paper is in scope. Do not include detailed source-search, grep, or bibliography-search diagnostics in HTML; keep that evidence in Markdown citation_alerts.md and/or run_metadata.json.
• Preserve the email draft formatting using a <pre> or equivalent preformatted block.

Recommendation reports:

• Start directly with ranked recommended papers.
• Put source cache, profile files, run date, and date-convention notes under a final Run Metadata section.

Citation reports:

• Start directly with Needs Email.
• Include extracted To: email addresses for email-worthy papers when public contacts are present.
• Put source cache, inspected files, profile files, and date notes under a final Run Metadata section.

If structured provenance is useful, create a sidecar run_metadata.json.

Token And Runtime Discipline

• Use rg and file snippets for source inspection.
• Prefer source .tex, .bbl, and .bib over PDFs when available.
• Avoid loading whole TeX projects into context.
• Keep non-recommended diagnostics out of reports unless requested.
• In chat, return only the highest-signal summary: urgent citation actions, top papers, and unusually promising ideas.

Validation

After code changes, run:

.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/pytest -q tests
.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/black --check src tests
.conda/arxiv-daily/bin/pylint src/arxiv_daily

After report generation, verify:

• Reports are under the arXiv source-date folder.
• recommendations.html exists, is titled Everyday arXiv 推荐, and its top-list links jump to matching paper-card IDs.
• HTML visible arXiv IDs and same-page anchors use bare IDs without vN suffixes.
• Each recommended paper in the HTML includes an arXiv abstract-page link.
• HTML reports do not include bottom metadata/footer provenance blocks.
• Recommendation report starts with recommended papers.
• Citation report starts with email-worthy items.
• Markdown metadata is at the bottom or metadata is in sidecar JSON.