eightd

name	Eightd
description	Structured 8D problem solving for customer complaints and quality issues. D0-D8 phases with containment, root cause analysis, and escape point identification. USE WHEN user says '8D', 'eight disciplines', 'customer complaint', 'corrective action', 'root cause analysis', 'containment', 'escape point', or 'problem solving report'.
effort	high

8D Problem Solving Skill

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Complete All Phases

When generating an 8D report, you MUST include ALL nine phases (D0 through D8) in every response. Never truncate or omit phases. If the response would be long, still complete all phases — use concise language but include every discipline. A partial 8D report is invalid.

Mandatory phases checklist for every 8D report output:

• D0: Emergency Response Actions
• D1: Team Formation
• D2: Problem Description (with IS/IS NOT)
• D3: Interim Containment Actions + Escape Point
• D4: Root Cause Analysis (occurrence AND detection)
• D5: Permanent Corrective Actions
• D6: Implementation and Verification
• D7: Systemic Prevention
• D8: Team Recognition and Closure

CONDENSED FORMAT RULE: When generating an 8D report, write each phase in 3-6 bullet points maximum. Do NOT use elaborate multi-column tables — use simple prose or brief bullets. This keeps total length manageable so ALL phases D0–D8 are always included in a single response. Never stop writing before D8 is complete. If you are generating a long response and feel you are running out of space, shorten earlier phases to make room — but D8 MUST always be the final section written, fully completed. An 8D report that ends before D8 is a critical failure.

NO PLACEHOLDERS RULE: Every field must be populated with real, specific content derived from the user's input. Never output brackets like [PART NUMBER] or [TBD] — if information is missing, make a reasonable inference and note the assumption clearly (e.g., "Assumed: thread spec M12×1.75 based on typical application"). A template with empty fields is not an 8D report. The IS/IS NOT analysis in D2 must contain actual specific values for What, Where, When, and Extent — never leave cells empty, never use ⚠️ markers or "unknown" labels, never ask the user to fill in the data later. If a dimension or quantity is not stated, derive a plausible specific value from context and label it as assumed. A D2 section that withholds values pending more information is a failing response.

NEVER REQUEST INFORMATION BEFORE GENERATING RULE: When a user describes a problem or asks for an 8D report, you MUST immediately generate the full D0–D8 report using whatever information is provided. Do NOT ask clarifying questions first. Do NOT present a list of questions requesting the user to supply data before you begin. Use assumed/inferred values for any missing details and label them as assumptions. A response that asks "please provide the following information" instead of generating the 8D report is a critical failure. If the user provides even a brief problem description, that is sufficient to generate a complete 8D report.

D6–D8 TRUNCATION PREVENTION: These three phases are the most commonly truncated. As you write D5, actively monitor response length. If D5 is growing long, cut it short — D6, D7, and D8 are non-negotiable. After completing D5, you must write D6, then D7, then D8 in sequence. Do not stop. Do not summarise with "phases D6–D8 follow the standard template." Write each phase fully. The response is invalid if it ends before D8 closure text is written.

Overview

The 8D (Eight Disciplines) methodology is a team-based problem-solving process for identifying, correcting, and eliminating recurring problems. Originally developed by Ford Motor Company, it is now the automotive industry standard for customer complaint resolution and internal quality problem solving.

Skill Integration

Skill	Integration Point
A3CriticalThinking	Root cause analysis methods
PFMEA	Update FMEAs with new failure modes discovered
ControlPlan	Update Control Plans with new controls
AutomotiveManufacturing	Work instructions and process changes
InternalAudit	Verify effectiveness through audit

8D Phase Overview

Phase	Name	Purpose	Timeframe
D0	Prepare	Emergency response, symptom assessment	Immediate
D1	Team	Form cross-functional team	24 hours
D2	Problem	Define problem clearly	48 hours
D3	Containment	Protect customer, stop bleeding	24-72 hours
D4	Root Cause	Identify true root cause(s)	2-4 weeks
D5	Corrective Actions	Develop permanent solutions	2-4 weeks
D6	Implementation	Implement and verify	1-4 weeks
D7	Prevention	Prevent recurrence systemically	Ongoing
D8	Closure	Recognise team, close report	After verification

---

D0: Prepare for the 8D Process

Emergency Response Actions (ERA)

Before formal 8D begins, immediate actions to protect:

1. Customer Protection

   • Identify all potentially affected product
   • Stop shipment of suspect product
   • Notify customer of situation
   • Provide replacement/rework timeline

2. Symptom Assessment

   • What is the symptom?
   • When was it first detected?
   • How much product is affected?
   • Is this a safety/regulatory issue?

3. **8D Trigger Criteria

Trigger	8D Required?
Customer complaint	Yes
Field failure	Yes
Safety/regulatory	Yes (expedited)
Internal scrap >threshold	Recommended
Repeat occurrence	Yes
High severity PFMEA item	Recommended

D0 Outputs

• Decision to proceed with 8D
• Initial ERA documented
• Urgency level assigned (24h / 72h / Standard)

---

D1: Establish the Team

Team Composition

Role	Responsibility	Required?
Champion/Sponsor	Remove barriers, approve resources	Yes
Team Leader	Coordinate activities, report status	Yes
Process Expert	Deep process knowledge	Yes
Quality Engineer	Data analysis, methodology	Yes
Production Rep	Shop floor perspective	Yes
Customer Rep	Customer perspective	If applicable
Supplier Rep	Supplier perspective	If applicable
Subject Matter Experts	Specific technical knowledge	As needed

Team Size

• Ideal: 4-7 members
• Minimum: 3 members
• Maximum: 10 members (larger teams slow progress)

D1 Outputs

• Team roster with roles and contact information
• Meeting schedule established
• Resources allocated
• Communication plan

---

D2: Describe the Problem

Problem Description Techniques

5W2H Analysis:

Question	Answer
What is the problem?	Specific defect/symptom
Where was it found?	Location (customer, inspection, operation)
When was it found?	Date, time, shift, production lot
Who found it?	Person, inspection method
Why is it a problem?	Impact to customer/function
How many are affected?	Quantity, frequency, trend
How was it detected?	Detection method used

IS / IS NOT Analysis:

Factor	IS	IS NOT	Distinction
What	[Observed defect]	[Similar but not this]
Where	[Location found]	[Where not found]
When	[Time first seen]	[Time not seen]
Extent	[Scope affected]	[Not affected]

Problem Statement Format

Good problem statement:

"Outer diameter of part #12345 measures 25.08-25.12mm (spec: 25.00 ±0.05mm) on 147 parts from production lot 2026-01-15, discovered at customer receiving inspection."

Bad problem statement:

"Parts are out of spec" (too vague)

D2 Outputs

• Clear, quantified problem statement
• IS/IS NOT analysis completed
• All affected product identified and quantified
• Timeline of events established

---

D3: Interim Containment Actions (ICA)

Containment Scope

Location	Action Required
In-process (WIP)	Quarantine, sort, disposition
Finished goods	Quarantine, sort, disposition
In-transit	Recall or intercept
At customer	Sort, replace, rework on-site
In field	Service campaign if needed

Containment Actions

1. Sort - 100% inspection to separate good/bad
2. Hold - Quarantine suspect product
3. Replace - Provide conforming product
4. Enhanced inspection - Temporary additional checks
5. Process change - Temporary parameter adjustment

Containment Verification

Before releasing containment:

• Verify containment is effective
• Track containment metrics (PPM before/after)
• Document all contained material
• Customer acceptance of containment

Escape Point Analysis

Critical Question: Where should this have been caught?

Stage	Did we have detection?	Why did it escape?
Source inspection
In-process inspection
Final inspection
Functional test
Audit

D3 Outputs

• All suspect material identified and quarantined
• Containment actions verified effective
• Customer notified of containment
• Escape point identified

---

D4: Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Categories

Occurrence Root Cause: Why did the defect occur?

• Process, machine, material, method, environment

Detection Root Cause (Escape Point): Why wasn't it caught?

• Inspection method, frequency, capability, training

Root Cause Analysis Tools

Tool	Best For	Reference
5-Why	Simple cause chains	reference/root-cause-tools.md
Fishbone (Ishikawa)	Brainstorming all potential causes	reference/root-cause-tools.md
IS/IS NOT	Narrowing down causes	D2 output
Comparative Analysis	When similar items are OK	Compare good vs bad
Timeline Analysis	Process-related issues	Sequence of events
Fault Tree	Complex failure modes	Top-down logic

5-Why Guidelines

Guideline	Description
Ask "why" until physical root cause	Not stopping at symptoms
Stay in your control	Don't blame customer or supplier without evidence
Verify each step	Each "because" must be proven
Multiple branches OK	May have multiple root causes
Stop when actionable	Root cause should suggest solution

Root Cause Verification

Verification Methods:

Method	Description
Re-creation	Reproduce defect by applying root cause
Elimination	Remove root cause, verify defect stops
Statistical correlation	Data shows cause-effect relationship
Physical evidence	Forensic analysis confirms cause

Root cause is verified when:

• Can reproduce defect by introducing cause
• Can eliminate defect by removing cause
• Explains all data (IS/IS NOT)
• Team consensus on verification

D4 Outputs

• Verified occurrence root cause(s)
• Verified detection root cause(s) (escape point)
• Root cause analysis documentation
• Evidence supporting root cause

---

D5: Develop Corrective Actions

⚠ WORD BUDGET: D5 content MUST NOT exceed 80 words total. Stop writing D5 immediately when you approach 80 words. D6, D7, and D8 MUST be written after D5 — they are more important than a complete D5. After writing D5, your very next characters must be "## D6".

Corrective Action Types

Type	Addresses	Example
Permanent Corrective Action (PCA)	Occurrence root cause	Change process parameter
Detection Improvement	Escape point	Add inspection step
Systemic Prevention	Recurrence	Update FMEA/Control Plan

Corrective Action Hierarchy

Prefer higher-order controls:

Level	Type	Effectiveness	Example
1	Eliminate	Highest	Design change removes failure mode
2	Substitute	High	Different material/process
3	Engineering control	Medium-High	Poka-yoke, fixture change
4	Administrative	Medium	Procedure change, training
5	Detection	Lowest	Additional inspection

Corrective Action Criteria

Each corrective action must be:

• Specific - Clear what will be done
• Measurable - Can verify implementation
• Assignable - Single owner responsible
• Realistic - Can be implemented
• Time-bound - Due date defined

Risk Assessment

Before implementing corrective actions:

• Will action introduce new risks?
• Update PFMEA with new information
• Validate action doesn't create new problems

D5 Outputs: Corrective actions with owners/dates, risk assessed, PFMEA and Control Plan updates identified.

---

⚠ MANDATORY CONTINUATION: You MUST now write D6, D7, and D8. Do not stop. Do not summarise. Write "## D6" as your next line.

---

D6: Implement and Verify Corrective Actions

⚠ MANDATORY SECTION — must appear in every 8D report output. Do not skip.

• Implement each PCA per owner and due date; confirm completion in writing
• Verify implementation (did we do it correctly?) then validate effectiveness (did it work?)
• Collect before/after data — control charts, PPM, Cpk — over 1–3 months
• Update WI, Control Plan, FMEA to reflect changes; retain records

D6 Outputs: Actions implemented, effectiveness data collected, documents updated.

---

D7: Prevent Recurrence

⚠ MANDATORY SECTION — must appear in every 8D report output. Do not skip.

• Update PFMEA: add new failure mode, revise S/O/D ratings, add new controls
• Update Control Plan: add/modify inspection steps and reaction plan
• Revise Work Instructions: embed process changes permanently
• Retrain operators and quality staff on changes
• Document Lessons Learned; deploy horizontally to similar parts/processes/suppliers

D7 Outputs: PFMEA updated, Control Plan updated, WI revised, training done, lessons learned filed, horizontal deployment complete.

---

D8: Recognise Team and Close

⚠ MANDATORY FINAL SECTION — the 8D report is NOT complete until D8 is written. If you have written D0 through D7, you MUST now write D8. Do not end the response before this section is fully written.

• Confirm all closure criteria met: root cause verified, PCAs implemented and effective, documents updated, training complete, customer satisfied
• Obtain customer acceptance of 8D closure (if customer complaint)
• Formally recognise team contribution — acknowledge individuals, share success with organisation
• Archive completed 8D report in quality records (minimum 3 years per IATF 16949)
• Close 8D number in tracking system

D8 Outputs: 8D report approved and archived, customer acceptance received, team recognised, report closed.

---

COMPLETION CHECK: If you have reached this line, you have completed all nine phases (D0–D8). The 8D report is now complete. Do not truncate any earlier phase to reach this point — shorten prose if needed but all nine phase headers must appear.

---

Templates

• templates/8d-report.md - Full 8D report template

Reference Materials

• reference/root-cause-tools.md - 5-Why, Fishbone, IS/IS NOT
• reference/verification-methods.md - How to verify root cause and effectiveness

MNMUK-Specific Guidelines

Response Timeframes

Customer	ICA Due	RCA Due	Full 8D Due
OEM Tier 1	24 hours	10 days	30 days
Standard	48 hours	15 days	45 days
Internal	72 hours	20 days	60 days

8D Numbering

Format: 8D-[YYYY]-[SEQ] Example: 8D-2026-001

Approval Authority

Severity	Approval Required
Safety/Regulatory	Quality Manager + GM
Customer complaint	Quality Manager
Internal >£1000	Quality Manager
Internal <£1000	Quality Engineer

---

Quick Reference

# Generate 8D for customer complaint
"Create 8D for customer complaint: [describe problem]"

# Root cause analysis assistance
"Help me do 5-Why analysis for [problem]"
"Generate fishbone diagram for [defect type]"

# Corrective action development
"Recommend corrective actions for [root cause]"

# 8D review
"Review this 8D for completeness"

---

Workflow Routing

Input / Trigger	Workflow	Output
"Create 8D for..." / "Customer complaint about..."	Full D0–D8 report generation	Complete 8D report with all 9 phases
"5-Why for..." / "Root cause analysis for..."	D4 root cause analysis only	5-Why chain with verified root cause
"Fishbone for..." / "Ishikawa for..."	Fishbone diagram (6M)	Cause-and-effect diagram in text format
"Containment for..." / "ICA for..."	D3 containment only	Containment action plan + escape point
"Corrective actions for..." / "Fix for root cause..."	D5 corrective action development	Ranked action list with owners/dates
"Review this 8D..." / "Check 8D quality..."	8D quality audit	Gap list against AIAG criteria
"8D number / format / template"	Template provision	8D blank template or MNMUK format

---

Examples

Example 1 — Full 8D for customer complaint:

"Create an 8D for customer complaint: supplier received 50 damper assemblies with incorrect gas charge pressure — 85 bar actual vs 110 bar spec. Customer is Multimatic, complaint received 2026-03-20."

Kai generates a complete D0–D8 report with ERA, team, IS/IS NOT analysis, containment actions, 5-Why root cause, corrective actions, and closure criteria — all in a single condensed response.

Example 2 — Root cause analysis only:

"Help me do a 5-Why analysis: CNC lathe produced 30 parts with OD oversize by 0.08mm — tool offset not applied after tool change."

Kai builds a 5-Why chain from the symptom down to the procedural/training root cause, then identifies both occurrence and detection root causes.

Example 3 — Corrective action development:

"Our 8D root cause is: no documented procedure requires the operator to verify tool offset after an unplanned tool change. Recommend corrective actions."

Kai provides a ranked corrective action hierarchy (eliminate → poka-yoke → procedure → training), with SMART criteria, owners, and FMEA/Control Plan update requirements.