Skip to main content

deterministic-replay

Design and test immutable committed state, canonical record encoding, deterministic transitions, crash replay, checkpoints, hash chains, and JS/formal executable models. Use when implementing replay, recovery, event logs, commit records, canonical serialization, hash roots, state-machine tests, JS simulators, TLA+/PlusCal, RTL equivalence, or reproducibility.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
ryanmaclean/skills
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月23日 10:46
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
1
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
deterministic-replay
description
Design and test immutable committed state, canonical record encoding, deterministic transitions, crash replay, checkpoints, hash chains, and JS/formal executable models. Use when implementing replay, recovery, event logs, commit records, canonical serialization, hash roots, state-machine tests, JS simulators, TLA+/PlusCal, RTL equivalence, or reproducibility.
# deterministic-replay — immutable facts, reproducible state The rule: > Nondeterminism may propose state; only deterministic mechanisms commit state. ## Required transition model Define a pure semantic function: ``` Transition(previous_state, canonical_record) -> next_state ``` Given identical prior committed state and identical canonical input, the result must not depend on: - wall-clock time - scheduler timing - CPU/core placement - agent/model randomness - retry timing - unordered map iteration - process-local hidden state ## Immutability Committed records never mutate. A correction is another committed record. Mutable current-state views must be reconstructable from immutable committed facts. ## Deterministic recovery Target: ``` checkpoint + immutable committed suffix -> current canonical state ``` Full replay and checkpoint+suffix replay must converge. ## Canonical encoding Before hashing, signing, comparing, or storing a persistent record, specify: - schema/version - fixed field order - exact integer widths - endianness - string/Unicode normalization - optional/default-field representation - byte/string encoding - hash domain separation Never persist/hash compiler-native structure layout. Do not rely on ordinary unordered JSON serialization. ## JS executable model For tiny persistence/state-machine work, prefer exhaustive exploration before random fuzzing. Model semantic states, not transistor/cache internals. Useful abstract states: ``` PROPOSED COHERENT_VISIBLE DEVICE_COMPLETE PERSISTENT TRUSTED_COMPLETE ``` Enumerate actions such as: ``` submit duplicate_submit durable_ack publish_completion reset recover replay_old_epoch ``` Explore all reachable action sequences to a useful depth and retain counterexamples as regression fixtures. ## Assertions At minimum: ``` CommittedRecordNeverMutates SameStateAndInputImpliesSameNextState ReplayOfCommittedPrefixIsDeterministic CheckpointPlusSuffixEqualsFullReplay CompletionImpliesPersistent RecoveryDoesNotCreateCommit DuplicateRequestCommitsAtMostOnce CanonicalRecordHashIsStable ``` ## Scheduling Do NOT require deterministic scheduling by default. Require deterministic outcome semantics: ``` same ordered committed facts -> same reconstructed state ``` ## Formal-to-hardware ladder ``` semantic model -> TLA+/PlusCal model check -> JS executable oracle -> RTL -> SVA/SymbiYosys -> FPGA differential traces -> ASIC only after evidence ``` JS and RTL should consume the same trace fixtures whenever possible. ## Trusted-head experiment Prefer testing whether hardware can retain only: ``` (epoch, last_tid, root_hash) ``` while immutable history remains external. ## Canonical references - `docs/CONSTRAINTS.md` - `scaffolds/durable-tid/docs/FORMAL.md` - `scaffolds/durable-tid/docs/DESIGN.md` - `rfcs/0005-formal-verification-before-rtl.md`
GitHubで見る