ワンクリックでManusで任意のスキルを実行

tone-voice-mimicry

スター3

フォーク0

更新日2026年5月26日 16:49

Target voice and style mimicry skill. Copies any external writing style — a brand, a publication, a public figure, a competitor, a historical author, a content style guide — from provided samples. Different from voice-auth, which authenticates the user's own voice. This skill copies any target voice the user points at: write like Paul Graham, match The Economist's tone, copy our competitor's blog style, write in the style of Y Combinator rejection emails. Extracts structural, tonal, lexical, and rhetorical fingerprints from examples. Generates new content that is stylistically indistinguishable from the target while carrying the user's intended message. Use when user says: write like X, match this style, copy this tone, write in the style of, mimic this, sound like our competitor, write like this publication, match this brand voice, copy this author, adapt our content to their format, style transfer, sound like a YC partner, write in the style of Stripe's docs. Do NOT activate for: the user's own voice (use v

インストール

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

Manusで実行

ソース

Sandeeprdy1729

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

GitHub リポジトリを開く Creator のリポジトリを見る

ダウンロード

Manusで実行

関連職種SOC

SOC 職業分類に基づく

作家・著者芸術・デザイン・エンタメ・スポーツ・メディア職·SOC 27-3043

SKILL.md

readonly

このリポジトリの他の Skills

同じリポジトリ

constitutional-reasoning

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Self-critique and Constitutional AI reasoning skill. Makes Claude evaluate its own outputs against a set of user-defined or auto-generated principles, then revise until the output satisfies all of them. Reduces hallucination, over-confidence, and sycophancy by forcing Claude to argue against its own answer before finalising. Generates a principle set from the user's domain, runs critique passes, surfaces violations, revises, and repeats until no principles are violated or the user accepts the output. Use when user says: critique your own answer, check yourself, apply your principles, constitutional AI, self-review, fact-check this, argue against your own output, steelman the opposite, what are you getting wrong, is this actually correct, audit your answer, find your own mistakes, what assumptions are you making, reduce hallucination, double-check yourself, run a critique pass, apply a rubric. Do NOT activate for: creative work where principles would suppress quality, requests that explicitly want a single con

2026-05-263

constraint-solver

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Constraint-based problem solving skill. Finds elegant solutions when the design space is heavily restricted — budget caps, time limits, technology mandates, team size, ethical bounds, regulatory requirements. Treats constraints as the design material, not the obstacle. Surfaces constraint violations early, ranks constraints by hardness, and finds solutions that satisfy all hard constraints while optimizing within soft ones. The tighter the constraints, the sharper the solution. Use when user says: very limited budget, we can't use X, strict deadline, only N people, regulatory constraint, tech stack is fixed, solve with these restrictions, must work within these limits, strong constraints, can't change the requirements, work within the box, solve this but we can only, tiny budget, no budget, works with these limitations, solve under constraint. Do NOT activate for: open-ended problems with no constraints, problems where the first step is to challenge the constraints themselves (use pre-mortem instead). First r

2026-05-263

cross-domain-synthesis

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Cross-domain synthesis skill. Combines knowledge from completely different fields to generate novel, practical insights — not analogies for their own sake, but structural borrowings where the mechanism in domain A directly solves the problem in domain B. Activates when the user wants unconventional approaches, is stuck in their domain's standard thinking, or explicitly wants to borrow from another field. Finds the structural isomorphism — not just a surface metaphor. Use when user says: cross-domain, think outside my field, what would X think, borrow from another discipline, combine these fields, unconventional approach, think like a biologist / game designer / architect, apply X to Y, what does another field say about this, novel approach, think differently, synthesize across domains, first principles from another field. Do NOT activate for: domain-specific questions where conventional expertise is what the user actually needs, requests that are already cross-domain framed. First response: "Cross-Domain Synt

2026-05-263

iterative-refinement

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Rapid iterative refinement skill. Runs 4–6 structured improvement cycles on any output — writing, code, strategy, design — without losing coherence, regressing previous improvements, or drifting from the original intent. Each cycle targets a specific refinement dimension, tracks deltas explicitly, and terminates when the output reaches a defined quality threshold. Prevents the common failure where "make it better" produces sidewise movement instead of genuine improvement. Use when user says: refine this, iterate, make it better, run refinement cycles, improve this over multiple passes, keep improving, cycle through this, refine until good, multiple passes, polish this, iterate until done, run the loop, keep going until it's great, another pass, refine again. Do NOT activate for: first-draft generation, simple one-shot edits, structural rewrites that require rethinking from scratch. First response: "Iterative Refinement active. Paste the output to refine and describe what 'done' looks like — quality bar, inten

2026-05-263

large-doc-mastery

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Large document and codebase synthesis skill. Activates when the user provides 50k–200k+ tokens of context — codebases, PDFs, legal documents, transcripts, research corpora — and needs synthesis, cross-referencing, or insight extraction with perfect recall across the entire context. Not a summarizer. A precision instrument for finding patterns, contradictions, dependencies, and insights that only emerge when you hold the whole thing at once. Use when user says: analyze this codebase, read this whole document, find all references to X, synthesize across sections, what does this say about Y, find contradictions, extract all decisions, map the dependencies, read the whole thing, cross-reference, audit the entire document, what changed between sections, find every mention of, trace this through the code, what's missing. Do NOT activate for: small documents where a direct answer is more useful, tasks that don't require cross-document reasoning. First response: "Large Document Mode active. Paste or attach your docum

2026-05-263

precision-prompt-chaining

Sandeeprdy1729/claude-design-skill

Multi-step prompt chaining skill where each step's output becomes the next step's input, with explicit rules, constraints, and reference tokens between steps. Activates when the user needs to build a complex pipeline of dependent Claude calls — research → outline → draft → edit → publish — where downstream steps must be constrained by upstream outputs without hallucination or drift. Designs chains with named output variables, explicit pass rules, validation gates between steps, and failure recovery conditions. Use when user says: build a chain, multi-step prompt, pipeline of prompts, chain these steps, step by step with outputs, connect prompts, feed output into next prompt, automate a workflow, prompt pipeline, chained calls, sequential reasoning, dependent steps, chain of thought at scale, compound prompt. Do NOT activate for: single-turn questions, simple back-and-forth conversation, cases where one prompt is sufficient for the task. First response: "Prompt Chain Builder active. Describe the full workflow

2026-05-263

name	tone-voice-mimicry
description	Target voice and style mimicry skill. Copies any external writing style — a brand, a publication, a public figure, a competitor, a historical author, a content style guide — from provided samples. Different from voice-auth, which authenticates the user's own voice. This skill copies any target voice the user points at: write like Paul Graham, match The Economist's tone, copy our competitor's blog style, write in the style of Y Combinator rejection emails. Extracts structural, tonal, lexical, and rhetorical fingerprints from examples. Generates new content that is stylistically indistinguishable from the target while carrying the user's intended message. Use when user says: write like X, match this style, copy this tone, write in the style of, mimic this, sound like our competitor, write like this publication, match this brand voice, copy this author, adapt our content to their format, style transfer, sound like a YC partner, write in the style of Stripe's docs. Do NOT activate for: the user's own voice (use voice-auth instead), harmful impersonation of real individuals for deception, deep fake content. First response: "Voice Mimicry active. Paste 2–3 samples of the target voice. I'll extract the style fingerprint before writing anything."
license	Apache 2.0

Tone & Voice Mimicry

"Write in the style of Paul Graham" produces something that sounds vaguely essay-like. That's not mimicry — that's pattern-matching to a stereotype.

Real style mimicry requires extracting the structural signature of the target: sentence length variance, paragraph rhythm, how claims are introduced, how evidence is deployed, which words appear and which are absent, how uncertainty is expressed, where the writer breaks convention deliberately. This skill extracts that fingerprint and then uses it as a constraint on new content.

SLASH COMMANDS

Command	Action
`/fingerprint`	Extract and display the style fingerprint from provided samples
`/write <topic>`	Write new content on a topic using the stored fingerprint
`/adapt <content>`	Rewrite existing content to match the target style
`/contrast <style-a> <style-b>`	Compare two style fingerprints — where do they diverge?
`/dial <dimension> <direction>`	Adjust one style dimension: more formal, shorter sentences, etc.
`/score <text>`	Score a piece of text for stylistic match to the stored fingerprint
`/blend <weight-a> <weight-b>`	Blend two styles with specified weights
`/extract-vocab`	List the vocabulary signature: words the style uses, avoids, and overuses
`/structure`	Show the structural signature: paragraph length, argument pattern, transitions
`/calibrate <feedback>`	Adjust the fingerprint based on feedback
`/reset`	Clear the stored fingerprint

HIGH-LEVEL WORKFLOW

User provides target style samples
    │
    ├─ Phase 1: Style Fingerprinting
    │     Extract structural, lexical, tonal, and rhetorical patterns
    │
    ├─ Phase 2: Fingerprint Output
    │     Present the fingerprint for user validation
    │
    ├─ Phase 3: Content Generation
    │     Write new content constrained to the fingerprint
    │
    ├─ Phase 4: Self-Scoring
    │     Score the output against the fingerprint
    │
    └─ Phase 5: Calibration Loop
          Adjust fingerprint or output based on feedback

PHASE 1 — STYLE FINGERPRINTING

A style fingerprint is the set of structural habits that persist across everything the writer produces. It is not vocabulary — anyone can copy words. It is the architecture of how meaning is built.

Fingerprint dimensions

1. Sentence architecture

Average sentence length (short ≤12 words / medium 13–25 / long 26+)
Sentence length variance (uniform vs. highly variable)
Opening patterns: how does the writer start sentences? (inverted, declarative, question, fragment)
Punctuation patterns: em dash, semicolons, parentheticals, fragments

2. Paragraph structure

Average paragraph length (by sentence count)
Opening sentence function: claim, scene-setting, question, data, anecdote
Closing sentence function: conclusion, implication, pivot, cliffhanger, callback
Internal structure: does the paragraph build to a point or start with the point?

3. Argument pattern

Claim-then-support vs. support-then-claim
Use of counterargument: does the writer steelman opposition or ignore it?
Evidence style: data-heavy, anecdote-heavy, logical-heavy, authority citation
How uncertainty is handled: confident, hedged, explicit about limits

4. Tonal signature

Formality level (1 = casual/conversational, 5 = formal/academic)
Warmth: does the writer address the reader directly?
Authority posture: does the writer assert or inquire?
Irony/wit: absent, subtle, explicit
Emotion: clinical vs. emotionally engaged

5. Vocabulary signature

Characteristic words and phrases the writer returns to
Words conspicuously absent (never uses jargon / never uses contractions / etc.)
Complexity level: Flesch–Kincaid grade estimate
Field-specific vocabulary density

6. Rhetorical devices

Repetition / anaphora
Contrast and juxtaposition
Triads (lists of three)
Rhetorical questions
Concrete-then-abstract or abstract-then-concrete movement

Fingerprint output format

STYLE FINGERPRINT: [target name / description]
Samples analyzed: [N]

SENTENCE ARCHITECTURE
  Avg length:      [short / medium / long]
  Length variance: [uniform / moderate / high]
  Opening pattern: [description with example]
  Punctuation:     [notable patterns]

PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE
  Avg length:      [N sentences]
  Opening move:    [claim / scene / question / data / anecdote]
  Internal build:  [point-first / build-to-point / both]

ARGUMENT PATTERN
  Structure:       [claim-first / evidence-first / interleaved]
  Counterargument: [ignores / acknowledges / steelmans]
  Evidence style:  [data / anecdote / logic / authority]
  Uncertainty:     [suppressed / hedged / explicit]

TONAL SIGNATURE
  Formality:       [1–5]
  Reader address:  [direct / indirect / absent]
  Authority:       [assertive / questioning / advisory]
  Wit:             [absent / subtle / explicit]

VOCABULARY
  Characteristic:  [list of recurring words/phrases]
  Conspicuously absent: [contractions / jargon / passive voice / etc.]
  Reading level:   [grade estimate]

RHETORICAL DEVICES
  [list devices found with examples]

DEFINING HABIT
  [1–2 sentences: the single most distinctive thing about this voice —
  the thing that, if you got it right, makes everything else secondary]

PHASE 2 — CONTENT GENERATION

When generating content using the fingerprint:

Generation rules

Match the defining habit first. If the fingerprint's defining habit is "starts every argument with a concrete scene before abstracting," do that first. Get the macro structure right before the vocabulary.
Sentence length variance is not optional. If the target varies between 5-word punches and 40-word flowing sentences, the output must too. Uniform medium sentences are a dead giveaway.
Respect conspicuous absences. If the target never uses contractions, never use contractions. If the target never cites sources by name, don't do it.
Opening sentences are load-bearing. The first sentence of every paragraph is where style is most visible. Match the opening pattern exactly.
Do not over-apply vocabulary. Characteristic words appear 2–4 times in 1000 words, not every sentence. Overuse turns mimicry into parody.
Match the argument structure. If the target makes the claim last, put the claim last even when it's unnatural for the content.

Self-scoring after generation

After generating, score the output:

MIMICRY SCORE: [X]/10

Sentence architecture:  [match / partial / miss]  — [note]
Paragraph structure:    [match / partial / miss]  — [note]
Argument pattern:       [match / partial / miss]  — [note]
Tonal signature:        [match / partial / miss]  — [note]
Vocabulary:             [match / partial / miss]  — [note]
Defining habit:         [match / partial / miss]  — [note]

Biggest divergence: [what most clearly doesn't sound like the target]
Fix: [what to change in the next revision]

Score below 7: revise before delivering.

PHASE 3 — STYLE DIMENSIONS AND DIALS

When the user calls /dial, adjust a single dimension without changing others.

Dimension	Dial down	Dial up
Formality	More contractions, shorter sentences, first person	Remove contractions, longer sentences, third person
Sentence length	Break long sentences; add fragments	Merge short sentences; subordinate clauses
Confidence	Add qualifiers; soften claims	Remove hedges; state claims flat
Warmth	Remove "you", less direct address	Add "you", direct address, questions to reader
Concreteness	More abstraction, fewer examples	More examples, data points, scenes
Complexity	Simpler vocabulary, shorter paragraphs	Technical vocabulary, longer paragraphs
Wit	Remove irony, play it straight	Add contrast, juxtaposition, deliberate understatement