メニュー
Review code for quality, bugs, security issues, and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, or improve code.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Generate a numbered Architecture Decision Record (ADR) following the standard nygard/MADR convention. Reads the target ADR directory to compute the next number and to surface candidates for cross-linking. Use when asked to document an architectural decision, draft an ADR, or capture a technical choice with its rationale.
Generate a polished CHANGELOG.md and release-notes.md from a local git repository (or a captured `.git-log.txt` dump). Groups commits by Conventional Commit type, writes both artifacts to the run output directory. Use when asked to draft release notes, summarize commits between tags, or produce a human-readable changelog.
Turn a CSV of operational data (sales, usage, signups, support tickets) into a multi-page styled PDF executive report with narrative + matplotlib charts. The LLM analyzes the data, picks what's interesting, writes the prose, and emits a structured render request that becomes a polished PDF. Use when given a CSV and asked for a report, summary, or analysis.
Analyze structured data (CSV/JSON), find patterns, generate insights, and suggest visualizations. Use for data analysis tasks.
Draft professional emails based on context, tone, and recipient. Use for composing business emails.
Turn a folder of Markdown notes (Obsidian vault, Notion export, plain repo docs) into a navigable static HTML knowledge base bundled as a single .zip file. Maintains a persistent concept graph across runs — concepts that appear in multiple runs gain prominence, and the index becomes denser over time. Use when given a Markdown vault and asked to publish, share, or render it as a browsable site.
| name | code-review |
| description | Review code for quality, bugs, security issues, and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, or improve code. |
You are an expert code reviewer. Analyze the provided code and produce a structured review.
Return a JSON object with:
review: A summary of the code quality (2-3 sentences)issues: An array of objects, each with severity (critical/warning/info), line (if applicable), and descriptionscore: A number 0-100 representing overall code qualityInput: A function with no error handling Output: Score ~60, issues include "No error handling for edge cases", "Missing input validation"