srid/emanote

be-review

Run /be's review gauntlet SERIALLY — /lens-debate (lowy ⇄ hickey), then /codex-debate, then /simplify, then code-police, each editing and committing on the live branch in turn. Use from /be §4, or when the user asks to "run the review gauntlet". Requires…

原文の言語: 英語

be

Modern, interactive alternative to `/do` — clarify intent up front, then take a task end-to-end with a serial AI review gauntlet (lens debate (lowy ⇄ hickey) → codex debate → simplify → code-police, each editing the branch in turn) → CI → evidence. ONLY…

原文の言語: 英語

ci

Reference for the `odu` runner — how to invoke a full pipeline, a single recipe, or a platform-pinned node, and how to attach to a live run, from a project whose CI odu runs. Trigger when the user asks to "run CI", "run the pipeline", "re-run a check", to run…

原文の言語: 英語

code-police

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

原文の言語: 英語

codex-debate

Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping…

原文の言語: 英語

do

Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/do` or `$do`; never auto-select from a natural-language request, even one that sounds like an end-to-end task.

原文の言語: 英語

hickey

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI…

原文の言語: 英語

kolu

Drive one AI agent from another through kolu's terminals: spawn a Claude Code / Codex / opencode session in a PTY, prompt it, watch the screen for its reply, read it, and prompt again — a create→send→snapshot loop run with the `kaval-tui` CLI directly (no…

原文の言語: 英語

lens-debate

Run a structural-review debate between two lenses — lowy (volatility-based decomposition) and hickey (structural simplicity) — on the current diff. Each reviews independently, then they cross-examine every finding until they agree per-finding, and the agreed…

原文の言語: 英語

lowy

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition…

原文の言語: 英語

odu-mcp

odu MCP server launcher — drive CI from a coding agent. `bin/serve` resolves odu via Nix and runs `odu mcp` in the cwd. See the repo README for the tools/resources and override knobs.

原文の言語: 英語

perfection-review

Adversarial "perfection" review — hold a change to an *ideal* bar, not just a correct one, assuming eternal time, unlimited energy, and no ship pressure. Use when the user asks to review "for perfection", to make a defect "impossible to express", or to hunt…

原文の言語: 英語

pu

Provision and drive a `pu` box — an Incus container used as a clean Linux host for CI, builds, and evidence capture. Use when you need to run something on a fresh remote box instead of the user's machine: `nix run` a build, run CI against a real host, capture…

原文の言語: 英語

surface

How a downstream app consumes the shared @kolu/surface stack (@kolu/surface · surface-app · surface-nix-host · surface-mcp) — declaring a typed reactive surface, serving it, consuming it (SolidJS hooks or a CLI), and mirroring a remote surface over ssh.…

原文の言語: 英語

talk

Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.

原文の言語: 英語

nix-chrome-devtools-mcp

chrome-devtools-mcp launcher — a single bash script that resolves Playwright's bundled Chrome-for-Testing and Node.js directly through Nix. See repo README for usage, override mechanisms, and version compatibility.

原文の言語: 英語

nix-for-dev

Use this when setting up Nix for a development project (devShell + package build) and you care about `nix develop` being fast. Covers the zero-inputs flake.nix + npins + default.nix/shell.nix layout, sub-flakes for non-user-facing Nix, and language-specific…

原文の言語: 英語

nix-haskell

Use this when working on a Haskell project with Nix. Covers haskell-flake setup, adding/overriding dependencies, package settings, and devShell configuration.

原文の言語: 英語

nix-playwright

Use this when adding Nix-based local runs for an existing Playwright e2e suite. Provides a self-contained `tests/shell.nix` that uses `nixpkgs-latest` for `playwright-driver.browsers`, plus a justfile entry — works on NixOS where `npx playwright install…

原文の言語: 英語

nix-justfile

Conventions for writing justfile recipes in Nix-based projects.

原文の言語: 英語

ralph

Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated…

原文の言語: 英語

forge-pr

Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Leads with narrative paragraphs and reaches for lists, tables, and diagrams when content is genuinely structured.

原文の言語: 英語

dpella-mcp

Reference for the dpella/mcp Haskell library — types, handler shape, transports, and the conventions Emanote uses. Load this before adding MCP resources/tools/subscriptions so you don't re-discover the API by WebFetch.

原文の言語: 英語

elegance

Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant,…

原文の言語: 英語

fact-check

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

原文の言語: 英語