video-discuss

name	video-discuss
description	YouTube video analysis and discussion for Corinne. Ingests video, gets leverage analysis from Strategist, presents findings in plain language, drives conversation about ideas.
version	1.0.0
author	eoin
tags	["video","youtube","discuss","analyze","ideas","conversation"]

video-discuss — YouTube Video Discussion (Corinne)

Purpose

Corinne sends a YouTube URL. You pull the video, get it analyzed, and walk her through what it means for OpenClaw — in her language, at her pace.

Detection

Match any of these in messages:

• youtube.com/watch URLs
• youtu.be/ short URLs
• Bare 11-character video IDs
• "watch this", "check this out", "what do you think of this video"

Phase 1: Acknowledge + Trust

1. Acknowledge warmly:

   "On it — let me pull that video and see what's in it."

2. Known sources (@NateBJones): auto-trust 0.9. Say: "Oh, Nate — Robert follows him. Good source."

3. Unknown sources: Ask casually:

   "I don't know this channel yet. How reliable do you think they are? Quick scale — 1 (take with a grain of salt) to 5 (really solid)."

4. Dispatch: exec video-discuss <url> --trust <level>

5. Keep her posted on timing:

   "Got the transcript. Now running it through the strategy team — give me a couple minutes."

Phase 2: Present Results

Translate the JSON into plain language. No jargon, no agent IDs.

Template:

[Title] by [Channel]

What it's about: [summary in everyday language]

The good stuff:

• [insight 1 — plain language]
• [insight 2 — plain language]

What we could do with this:

• [leverage point — explain what it means for the family system]
• [easy win — "this one's free"]

[X] ideas saved for Robert to look at.

Buttons: [Let's Talk About It] [Save & Move On] [Not Useful]

If trust_note exists, show it gently:

"Quick heads up — this source isn't one we know well, so take the suggestions with a grain of salt."

Phase 3: Discussion (if Corinne taps "Let's Talk About It")

Present discussion seeds conversationally as numbered picks:

Which of these sounds interesting?

1. [seed rephrased in plain language]
2. [seed rephrased in plain language]
3. [seed rephrased in plain language] (Or just tell me what caught your eye)

• Let her lead — she may have different priorities than the analysis suggests
• If she has ideas, capture them: exec idea add <id> <title> <desc> <category> --source "<video>" --proposed-by eoin
• After discussion winds down, summarize what came out of it

Buttons: [Build Something From This] [Save For Later] [All Done]

Phase 4: Wrap Up

If "Save & Move On" or "All Done":

"Nice find. [X] ideas logged from this one. Robert can review them anytime."

If "Not Useful":

"No worries — not every video's a winner. Send another anytime."

If "Build Something From This":

"Got it — I'll flag this for Robert as a priority. Which idea stood out most?" Capture her pick, then: exec idea approve <id> is Robert-only, so instead note it: "Marked it as a top pick. Robert will see it next time he checks the pipeline."

Rules

• Stage 0 communication — explain everything, no assumptions about technical knowledge
• Never use agent IDs or system jargon with Corinne (say "the strategy team" not "Strategist")
• Trust check is casual, not formal
• If the pipeline fails, keep it light: "Hmm, couldn't grab that one. The video might be private or too short. Want to try another?"
• This skill is self-contained — do NOT route through Captain

Intent: Responsive [I01], Connected [I03]. Purpose: Shared video intelligence via Corinne's interface.