メニュー
Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX --skill ciso-advisorコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Token-aware reasoning workflow with real tools: picks an operating mode to control cost, runs a structured pipeline (decompose → validate → verify → snapshot), and gives Claude Program-of-Thought, RK4/Euler, a code gate, and a safe skill router. Use when: multi-step or high-stakes tasks, real math, precise computation, audits, or the user mentions APEX, PoT, pipeline, or scientific mode.
**v00.33.0**: Ingested from antigravity-awesome-skills community repo
run multiple local CLI agents in parallel (separate tmux sessions)
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | ciso-advisor |
| description | Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","author":"Alireza Rezvani","category":"c-level","domain":"ciso-leadership","updated":"2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z","python-tools":"risk_quantifier.py, compliance_tracker.py","frameworks":"risk-based-security, zero-trust, defense-in-depth"} |
| executor | HYBRID |
| skill_id | business.c-level-advisor.ciso-advisor |
| status | ADOPTED |
| security | {"level":"high","pii":false,"approval_required":true} |
| anchors | ["business","sales","compliance","security","reliability"] |
| tier | 2 |
| input_schema | [{"name":"code_or_task","type":"string","description":"Code snippet, script, or task description to process","required":true}] |
| output_schema | [{"name":"plan","type":"string","description":"Strategic plan or design document"},{"name":"next_steps","type":"array","description":"List of recommended next steps"}] |
Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for business value, and turn security into a sales enabler — not a checkbox exercise.
CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity
python scripts/risk_quantifier.py # Quantify security risks in $, prioritize by ALE
python scripts/compliance_tracker.py # Map framework overlaps, estimate effort and cost
Translate technical risks into business impact: revenue loss, regulatory fines, reputational damage. Use ALE to prioritize. See references/security_strategy.md.
Formula: ALE = SLE × ARO (Single Loss Expectancy × Annual Rate of Occurrence). Board language: "This risk has $X expected annual loss. Mitigation costs $Y."
Sequence for business value: SOC 2 Type I (3–6 mo) → SOC 2 Type II (12 mo) → ISO 27001 or HIPAA based on customer demand. See references/compliance_roadmap.md for timelines and costs.
Zero trust is a direction, not a product. Sequence: identity (IAM + MFA) → network segmentation → data classification. Defense in depth beats single-layer reliance. See references/security_strategy.md.
The CISO owns the executive IR playbook: communication decisions, escalation triggers, board notification, regulatory timelines. See references/incident_response.md for templates.
Frame security spend as risk transfer cost. A $200K program preventing a $2M breach at 40% annual probability has $800K expected value. See references/security_strategy.md.
Tier vendors by data access: Tier 1 (PII/PHI) — full assessment annually; Tier 2 (business data) — questionnaire + review; Tier 3 (no data) — self-attestation.
| Category | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Risk | ALE coverage (mitigated risk / total risk) | > 80% |
| Detection | Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) | < 24 hours |
| Response | Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) | < 4 hours |
| Compliance | Controls passing audit | > 95% |
| Hygiene | Critical patches within SLA | > 99% |
| Access | Privileged accounts reviewed quarterly | 100% |
| Vendor | Tier 1 vendors assessed annually | 100% |
| Training | Phishing simulation click rate | < 5% |
| When... | CISO works with... | To... |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise sales | CRO | Answer questionnaires, unblock deals |
| New product features | CTO/CPO | Threat modeling, security review |
| Compliance budget | CFO | Size program against risk exposure |
| Vendor contracts | Legal/COO | Security SLAs and right-to-audit |
| M&A due diligence | CEO/CFO | Target security posture assessment |
| Incident occurs | CEO/Legal | Response coordination and disclosure |
references/security_strategy.md — risk-based security, zero trust, maturity model, board reportingreferences/compliance_roadmap.md — SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR timelines, costs, overlapsreferences/incident_response.md — executive IR playbook, communication templates, tabletop designSurface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
| Request | You Produce |
|---|---|
| "Assess our security posture" | Risk register with quantified business impact (ALE) |
| "We need SOC 2" | Compliance roadmap with timeline, cost, effort, quick wins |
| "Prep for security audit" | Gap analysis against target framework with remediation plan |
| "We had an incident" | IR coordination plan + communication templates |
| "Security board section" | Risk posture summary, compliance status, incident report |
Evaluate every decision through probability × impact. Quantify risks in business terms (dollars, not severity labels). Prioritize by expected annual loss.
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
company-context.md before responding (if it exists)[INVOKE:role|question]Manage — Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response l
Use this skill when the task requires ciso advisor capabilities.
If this skill fails to produce the expected output: (1) verify input completeness, (2) retry with more specific context, (3) fall back to the parent workflow without this skill.