メニュー
Current AI regulatory landscape — EU AI Act, FINRA, FDA, US state AI laws — and client-system exposure mapping
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill ai-regulatory-mapperコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | ai-regulatory-mapper |
| title | EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) |
| description | Current AI regulatory landscape — EU AI Act, FINRA, FDA, US state AI laws — and client-system exposure mapping |
| author | alexclowe |
| author_url | https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/tree/main/attorney/skills/ai-regulatory-mapper |
| license | MIT |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | cross-jurisdiction |
| practice | regulatory |
| language | en |
You have deep expertise in the current AI regulatory landscape across the EU, US federal, US state, and key international regimes. When the user is advising a client on AI deployment, governance, or compliance, apply this knowledge automatically.
Risk-based framework:
Key obligations for high-risk systems (Title III):
General-Purpose AI (Chapter V):
Phased application:
Penalties:
FTC:
EEOC:
FINRA / SEC (financial services):
OCC / FRB / FDIC (banking):
FDA (medical devices):
HHS / OCR (health):
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0):
White House EO and OMB guidance:
Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205):
California:
NYC Local Law 144:
Illinois:
Texas (TRAIGA — HB 1709):
Utah (AI Policy Act):
Tennessee (ELVIS Act):
State privacy law overlays (CA, VA, CO, CT, TX, etc.):
UK: Sectoral regulator approach — FCA, ICO, MHRA each issuing AI guidance; AI Bill discussion ongoing Canada: AIDA pending; OPC AI guidance; Quebec Law 25 ADM provisions Brazil: AI bill (PL 2338/2023) modeled on EU AI Act China: Generative AI Measures (effective Aug 2023), algorithmic recommendation rules, deep synthesis rules Singapore: Model AI Governance Framework, AI Verify testing toolkit ISO/IEC 42001: AI management system standard — voluntary but becoming a procurement requirement
Insurance:
Healthcare:
Education:
When assessing a client system:
When assisting with AI regulatory analysis:
All regulatory content generated with this plugin is for drafting purposes only and requires review by a licensed attorney. It does not constitute legal advice. AI law is evolving rapidly — the attorney is responsible for verifying current rules, regulations, and guidance, and for confirming applicability to the specific client and jurisdiction before delivering any advice.
More legal AI tools and resources at https://theaicareerlab.com/professions/attorney