メニュー
Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill specification-writingコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | specification-writing |
| title | Specification Writing: Section-by-Section Patent Description |
| description | Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification. |
| author | wanshuiyin |
| author_url | https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/tree/main/skills/skills-codex/specification-writing |
| license | MIT |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | general |
| practice | ip |
| language | en |
Write the patent specification based on: $ARGUMENTS
Adapted from /paper-write for patent specifications. The specification supports the claims -- it is not a paper.
REVIEWER_MODEL = gpt-5.5 — External reviewer for specification qualityJURISDICTION = "auto" — Inherit from pipeline or detect from args; CN, US, EP, ALLOUTPUT_FORMAT = "markdown" — Markdown drafts; converted to filing format by /jurisdiction-formatOUTPUT_DIR = "patent/" — Base output directoryLANGUAGE = "auto" — Auto from jurisdiction: CN->Chinese, US/EP->Englishpatent/CLAIMS.md — the drafted claims (primary source)patent/INVENTION_DISCLOSURE.md — invention decompositionpatent/PRIOR_ART_REPORT.md — for background sectionLoad ../shared-references/patent-writing-principles.md for specification writing rules, language guidelines, and reference numeral conventions.
Load ../shared-references/patent-format-cn.md or patent-format-us.md or patent-format-ep.md based on jurisdiction.
Create the output directory and section files:
patent/specification/
├── title.md
├── technical_field.md
├── background.md
├── summary.md
├── drawings_description.md
├── detailed_description.md
└── abstract.md
1-2 paragraphs identifying the technical domain:
This is NOT a literature review. It directly sets up the problem.
Structure:
CN format: "背景技术" section describing existing technology and its shortcomings.
Three parts, directly mirroring INVENTION_DISCLOSURE.md:
Technical Problem (要解决的技术问题):
Technical Solution (技术方案):
Advantages (有益效果):
Invoke /figure-description as a sub-skill if user has provided figures:
/figure-description "patent/figures/"
If no user figures, describe what figures should exist based on the claims.
Format:
Invoke /embodiment-description as a sub-skill:
/embodiment-description "patent/CLAIMS.md"
This section must:
Jurisdiction-specific word limits:
| Jurisdiction | Word Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CN | 300 words (Chinese characters) | Include most representative claim reference |
| US | 150 words (2500 characters) | Enable efficient searching, no legal phrases |
| EP | ~150 words | No statements on merits or value |
The abstract summarizes:
Verify every claim element finds support in the specification:
| Claim | Element | Specification Section | Paragraph(s) | Reference Numeral |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | step a | detailed_description | ¶3 | 202 |
| 1 | step b | detailed_description | ¶4 | 204 |
| X | component A | detailed_description | ¶2 | 102 |
If any element lacks support, add the necessary description before proceeding.
Call REVIEWER_MODEL via a dedicated Codex reviewer agent at xhigh reasoning:
spawn_agent:
model: gpt-5.5
reasoning_effort: xhigh
message: |
You are a patent examiner reviewing a specification for completeness.
CLAIMS: [all claims]
SPECIFICATION: [all specification sections]
Check for:
1. Written description support: Does every claim element have explicit or inherent support?
2. Enablement: Can a POSITA practice the invention from this specification?
3. Consistency: Do reference numerals match across figures and specification?
4. Language quality: Any subjective terms, relative terms without definition, or result-to-be-achieved language?
5. Missing embodiments: Are there claim features that need additional embodiments?
6. Background deficiencies: Are they technical and specific enough?
All specification sections are in patent/specification/.
Summary file: patent/specification/SPECIFICATION_INDEX.md with:
## Patent Specification
### Sections
| Section | File | Word Count | Status |
|---------|------|-----------|--------|
| Title | title.md | | Complete |
| Technical Field | technical_field.md | | Complete |
| Background | background.md | | Complete |
| Summary | summary.md | | Complete |
| Drawings Description | drawings_description.md | | Complete |
| Detailed Description | detailed_description.md | | Complete |
| Abstract | abstract.md | | Complete |
### Claim Support Status
| Claim | Elements Supported | Elements Missing |
|-------|-------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | All | None |
| X | All | None |
cat <<'EOF' heredoc.