メニュー
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/TuYv/ccpm --skill altitude-horizon-frameworkコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分
Use when the user asks to "write ad copy", "generate RSA headlines", or "build ad creative at volume"; produces ad units — RSA headlines/descriptions, hooks, and an angle matrix — message-matched to the destination landing page. Not for scoring an ad account — use ad-account-auditor; not for the post-click page — use landing-optimizer; not for organic articles — use content-writer. 广告创意/广告文案/RSA标题
Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | altitude-horizon-framework |
| description | Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps. |
| intent | Defines the two-axis mental model that distinguishes Director-level thinking from PM thinking: **Altitude** (how wide you zoom out) and **Horizon** (how far ahead you look). Use this to understand what actually changes in the transition, diagnose which transition zone is creating friction, and apply the Cascading Context Map when organizational direction is vague or absent. |
| type | component |
| theme | career-leadership |
| best_for | ["Understanding what actually changes when you move from PM to Director","Diagnosing which transition zone is creating friction in your role","Applying the Cascading Context Map when organizational direction is vague"] |
| scenarios | ["I'm a senior PM trying to understand what changes when I become a Director","I'm newly promoted to Director and something isn't clicking — help me diagnose it","My team has no clear direction and I need to create context from a vague company strategy"] |
| estimated_time | 10-15 min |
Defines the two-axis mental model that distinguishes Director-level thinking from PM thinking: Altitude (how wide you zoom out) and Horizon (how far ahead you look). Use this to understand what actually changes in the transition, diagnose which transition zone is creating friction, and apply the Cascading Context Map when organizational direction is vague or absent.
This is not a seniority hierarchy. A PM operating at the right altitude for their role is doing excellent work. A Director operating at PM altitude is leaving their actual job undone.
Nothing required — this is a reference framework you can read start to finish. Also useful: Your current situation (role, the transition friction you're feeling, a decision you're weighing). With that, the framework can be applied directly to diagnose which transition zone you're in.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. Read it as a mental model; pair it with director-readiness-advisor for guided coaching.
Example invocation: Apply the altitude-horizon framework to my situation: senior PM, just inherited two more teams, drowning in delivery detail.
Altitude — Scope
Horizon — Time
The sharpest analogy for the role shift:
| Dimension | PM (Waiter) | Director (Restaurant Operator) |
|---|
| Focus | Individual diner experience | Entire system — staffing, margins, menu, suppliers |
| Authority | Influence without control | Portfolio decisions, budget, resource allocation |
| Success metric | Table seven is happy | Restaurant is profitable, consistent, and scalable |
| Relationship to customers | Direct, daily, intimate | Aggregate patterns, buyer personas, market cohorts |
| Failure mode | Ignoring Table Seven's needs | Obsessing over Table Seven's lemons |
The waiter excels at translating the experience of individual diners. The operator isn't ignoring diners — they're asking different questions: "Are we overspending on ingredients? Is a 75-page menu confusing customers? Do we need another server for the dinner rush?" Neither question is more important in absolute terms. They're appropriate to different roles.
The PM → Director shift requires movement across four zones. Most people struggle with one or two more than the others — diagnosing which one is the leverage point.
Zone 1 — Thinking Altitude
Zone 2 — Persona Shift
Zone 3 — Hero Syndrome Recovery
Zone 4 — Direction Creation
Hero Syndrome What it looks like: Jumping in to solve problems directly. Staying close to the tactical work. Wanting visibility on individual wins. Why it happens: PMs are trained to be helpful and responsive. Directors get fewer pats on the back, so they regress to the old reward loop. The cost: You under-perform as a Director while over-functioning as a senior IC. Your team doesn't develop because you're in their way.
Allergic to Process What it looks like: Resisting shared structures. Letting high-performing PMs run their own playbooks independently. Why it happens: PMs naturally resist bureaucracy. Early director permissiveness can feel like "great leadership" and "trusting the team." The cost: Stakeholders across marketing, finance, and leadership can't synthesize inconsistent outputs. Without shared processes, teams become "monkeys in the room breaking glass."
People-Pleaser Leadership What it looks like: Wanting the team to like you. Avoiding hard feedback. Saying yes to stakeholder requests to preserve relationships. Why it happens: The skills that made you a great PM — listening, empathy, responsiveness — become liabilities at organizational scale. The cost: You confuse "popular" with "effective." Respect is built through clarity and hard calls, not niceness.
Instant Gratification Trap What it looks like: Reading leadership books, collecting certifications, asking "what do I need to do to get promoted?" Why it happens: PMs are good at optimization. They try to shortcut the experience requirement. The cost: Director readiness requires war stories and lived humility. You can study your way to fluency in the vocabulary, but not to readiness for the role.
Black-and-White Thinking What it looks like: "This seems like an obvious decision." "Why can't we fund both?" "Why is everything so political here?" Why it happens: PMs operate in cleaner problem spaces with clearer cause-and-effect. Director decisions involve competing constraints, limited information, and organizational dynamics. The cost: Fast decisions with low confidence create downstream chaos. The grayscale is not a failure of leadership — it's the actual terrain.
When organizational direction is vague or absent, Directors don't wait — they cascade.
The six steps:
What this fixes: Teams "wandering in the wilderness" — shipping work that doesn't connect to strategy because the context was never translated for them.
The core principle: Even with incomplete direction from above, a Director's job is to fill the gap downward. Waiting for perfect clarity is a PM habit. Creating imperfect-but-useful clarity is a Director skill.
Use when your team is unclear on what organizational strategy means for their work.
## Context Cascade
**Company Priority:** [What leadership said — in their words]
**Business Unit Translation:** [How your BU contributes to that priority]
**Product Portfolio Translation:** [How your products contribute to that]
**Team Accountabilities:** [What each team owns specifically]
**Why this matters:** [The so-what for your team — what changes, what stays the same]
One page is better than ten. The goal is clarity, not comprehensiveness.
See examples/sample.md for a full worked scenario with a completed Cascading Context Map and anti-pattern contrast.
Situation: CEO announces at QBR: "We're doubling down on enterprise." Three PMs ask their Director: "What does that mean for our roadmaps?"
PM response (wrong altitude): "Let's add enterprise features to our sprint backlogs."
Director response (right altitude): Runs a Cascading Context Map. Translates: "Enterprise means larger deal sizes, longer sales cycles, and more integration requirements. For our portfolio: Product A owns the admin controls story, Product B owns the API documentation story, Product C owns the security certification story. Here's what changes in Q3 planning and what doesn't."
Why it works: Director didn't wait for more clarity. They created it from available signal.
Situation: A PM on the team is struggling with a difficult stakeholder relationship.
Director response (wrong): "Let me just talk to that stakeholder directly — I'll get it sorted out."
Director response (right): "Walk me through what you've tried. Let's figure out where it broke down and what you'll do differently."
Why it matters: The first response solves the problem and creates dependency. The second response grows the PM. Directors who rescue too often build teams that can't function without them.
Situation: A high-performing PM insists on documenting requirements in a different format from the rest of the team because "my stakeholders prefer it."
Director response (wrong): "That's fine, she's our best PM — if it works for her team, let it go."
Director response (right): "Joe is crushing it individually. But when marketing tries to synthesize across all three PMs' work, they can't. Shared process isn't bureaucracy — it's what makes the system legible to everyone outside it."
Why it matters: Protecting high-performer exceptions creates invisible coordination costs. The Restaurant Operator's job is the system, not the star waiter.
Symptom: Using strategy language ("portfolio," "ecosystem," "long-term vision") while still making sprint-level decisions
Consequence: You sound like a Director but function like a PM. Your team is confused about who's actually deciding and at what level.
Fix: If you're in the details, own it. If you're not, delegate it fully. Mixing altitude levels without signaling creates ambiguity that erodes team trust.
Symptom: Running the Cascading Context Map once at annual planning, then never revisiting it
Consequence: Team aligns in Q1 and drifts as strategy evolves. By Q3, team work is decoupled from current priorities.
Fix: Revisit the cascade at major inflection points — quarterly planning, significant exec changes, pivots, or org restructuring.
Symptom: Shielding the team from hard decisions, over-explaining constraints you're holding, softening feedback into meaninglessness
Consequence: Team operates without accurate context; trust erodes when reality eventually lands without warning.
Fix: Be transparent about the "why" behind hard decisions. You don't need to share everything — but what you share should be honest and actionable.
Symptom: Spending PM years worried about portfolio strategy, organizational dynamics, and "thinking above your pay grade"
Consequence: You under-serve your current role. PMs who think like Directors often miss the customer-level signal their actual role requires.
Fix: Play your current role with full commitment. The transition will demand Director thinking soon enough — you'll be ready because you did your PM work well, not because you rehearsed the Director role prematurely.
skills/director-readiness-advisor/SKILL.md — Interactive advisor that uses this framework to diagnose and coach your specific transition situation