ソース情報
- リポジトリ
- TuYv/ccpm
- ソースの最終更新活動
- 2026年8月14日 19:45
- 検出された SKILL.md の言語
- 英語
- スター
- 1
- フォーク
- 2
インストール方法
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
ソースファイルを確認
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
メニュー
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/TuYv/ccpm --skill roborev-reviewコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか?SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SKILL.md を表示中
Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分
Use when the user asks to "write ad copy", "generate RSA headlines", or "build ad creative at volume"; produces ad units — RSA headlines/descriptions, hooks, and an angle matrix — message-matched to the destination landing page. Not for scoring an ad account — use ad-account-auditor; not for the post-click page — use landing-optimizer; not for organic articles — use content-writer. 广告创意/广告文案/RSA标题
Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试
| name | roborev-review |
| description | Use only when the user explicitly invokes /roborev-review |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Request a code review for a commit and present the results.
/roborev-review [commit] [--type security|design] [--panel <name>|none]
Invocation must be explicit: literal personal /roborev-review, or structured
Grok Build skill selection.
Requests such as “review this commit” without one of these explicit mechanisms must use native
behavior and must not run roborev.
roborev uses a local daemon. If a command fails with permission denied, the sandbox may be
blocking access to its loopback port or Unix socket. Retry the same command with
the runtime's supported sandbox escalation mechanism. Do not start or restart the daemon because a
sandboxed status probe cannot reach it.
Do NOT invoke this skill when the user is presenting or pasting existing review results. Messages that contain review findings, verdicts, or summaries are outputs — not requests to start a new review.
This skill requires you to execute bash commands to validate the commit and run the review. The task is not complete until the review finishes and you present the results to the user.
These instructions are guidelines, not a rigid script. Use the conversation context. Skip steps that are already satisfied. Defer to project-level AGENTS.md instructions when they conflict with these steps.
When the user invokes /roborev-review [commit] [--type security|design] [--panel <name>|none]:
If a commit ref is provided, use the commit-provided command snippet below; it stores and validates the ref before invoking roborev review.
If validation fails, inform the user the ref is invalid. Do not proceed.
Construct and execute the review command:
If no commit is specified, run:
roborev review --wait [--type <type>] [--panel <name>|none]
If a commit is specified, run:
read -r commit <<'ROBOREV_REF'
<commit>
ROBOREV_REF
git rev-parse --verify -- "$commit^{commit}" || exit 1
roborev review "$commit" --wait [--type <type>] [--panel <name>|none]
--type is specified, include it--panel <name> is specified, include it (fans out to the named config panel); --panel none forces a single-agent reviewThe --wait flag blocks until the review completes.
If the command output contains an error (e.g., daemon not running, repo not initialized, review errored), report it to the user. Suggest roborev status to check the daemon, roborev init if the repo is not initialized, or re-running the review.
Otherwise, present the review to the user:
If you pass --panel <name>, or a default_panel is configured for explicit
reviews, the review fans out to a panel of reviewers. In that case the
Enqueued job <id> is the synthesis (parent) job that aggregates them, and
its verdict and findings are the synthesized result across the whole panel.
Present that synthesized verdict/findings, and offer fix on that parent id —
never an individual reviewer. roborev show prints a one-line reviewers summary
(e.g. 3 reviewers: bug P, security F) for a synthesis job. --panel none
forces a single-agent review, and automatic post-commit hook reviews stay
single-agent regardless of default_panel.
If the review has findings (verdict is Fail), offer to address them:
/roborev-fix <job_id>"Extract the job ID from the review output to include in the suggestion. Look for it in the Enqueued job <id> for ... line or in the review header. For a panel review this id is the synthesis parent.
If the review passed, confirm the result and do not offer /roborev-fix.
Default review of HEAD:
User: /roborev-review
Agent:
roborev review --wait/roborev-fix 1042"Security review of a specific commit:
User: /roborev-review abc123 --type security
Agent:
git rev-parse --verify -- "abc123^{commit}"roborev review abc123 --wait --type security/roborev-fix 1043"/roborev-design-review — shorthand for /roborev-review --type design/roborev-fix — fix a review's findings in code/roborev-review-branch — review all commits on the current branch