メニュー
Use when writing tests, measuring coverage, or running characterization, performance, or PR-review QA. Comprehensive specialist combining DDD testing, characterization tests, performance profiling, and TRUST 5 quality-assurance validation.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/TuYv/ccpm --skill moai-workflow-testingコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SKILL.md を表示中
Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分
Use when the user asks to "write ad copy", "generate RSA headlines", or "build ad creative at volume"; produces ad units — RSA headlines/descriptions, hooks, and an angle matrix — message-matched to the destination landing page. Not for scoring an ad account — use ad-account-auditor; not for the post-click page — use landing-optimizer; not for organic articles — use content-writer. 广告创意/广告文案/RSA标题
Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试
| name | moai-workflow-testing |
| description | Use when writing tests, measuring coverage, or running characterization, performance, or PR-review QA. Comprehensive specialist combining DDD testing, characterization tests, performance profiling, and TRUST 5 quality-assurance validation. |
| when_to_use | Use for comprehensive testing and QA: DDD domain-driven testing, characterization tests, behavior preservation, performance profiling, code and PR review, CI/CD, and TRUST 5 quality-assurance validation. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| compatibility | Designed for Claude Code |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Bash(pytest:*), Bash(ruff:*), Bash(npm:*), Bash(npx:*), Bash(node:*), Bash(jest:*), Bash(vitest:*), Bash(go:*), Bash(cargo:*), Bash(mix:*), Bash(uv:*), Bash(bundle:*), Bash(php:*), Bash(phpunit:*), Grep, Glob |
| user-invocable | false |
| metadata | {"version":"2.4.0","category":"workflow","status":"active","updated":"2026-07-10","modularized":"true","tags":"workflow, ddd, testing, debugging, performance, quality, review, pr-review","author":"MoAI-ADK Team"} |
| progressive_disclosure | {"enabled":true,"level1_tokens":100,"level2_tokens":5000} |
Unified development workflow combining DDD (domain-driven development) testing, debugging guidance, performance optimization, automated code review, and CI/CD quality gates. Emphasizes behavior preservation during refactoring through characterization tests.
Core Capabilities:
Workflow Progression: Debug → Refactor → Optimize → Review → Test → Profile
When to Use:
Five integrated components form the workflow:
Quality assessment model with five dimensions:
Overall score: weighted average with critical-dimension override (security/testability cannot be masked).
See TRUST 5 detailed dimensions and scoring for full assessment rubric.
Legacy Code (PRESERVE phase):
Greenfield Development:
All three follow a 6-step pattern: capture/analyze → classify → identify candidates → apply → verify → document.
See debugging/refactoring/performance step-by-step walkthroughs for detailed process tables.
5-step multi-agent pipeline:
See PR review multi-agent architecture and output format for agent role detail and example output.
Per-language toolchain mappings (Python pytest+ruff+bandit, JS/TS Jest+ESLint+npm audit, Go go test+staticcheck+gosec, Rust cargo test+clippy+gosec equivalents).
See multi-language toolchain reference for per-language testing/lint/security/perf tool inventory.
Three strictness modes:
Gate config: per-dimension thresholds, max issues by severity, coverage targets, perf benchmarks.
Four-stage pipeline: Code Quality → Testing → Performance → Security. Each stage terminates pipeline on failure with stage-specific failure report.
See CI/CD integration patterns (GitHub Actions + Docker) for job configuration walkthroughs.
Playwright patterns (Page Object Model, cross-browser, visual regression) and documentation-lookup integration. See Playwright best practices.
Deep-dive modules for each workflow stage. These describe conceptual workflows (not an importable SDK) — apply each with your project's own toolchain. Start at the modules index, or jump to a stage:
Status: Production Ready Last Updated: 2026-07-10 Maintained by: MoAI-ADK Development Workflow Team Version: 2.5.0 (audit remediation: language-neutrality + module re-linking)
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This code is already covered by integration tests" | Integration tests catch different bugs than unit tests. The testing pyramid exists for a reason. |
| "Mocking the database is too hard, I will skip that test" | If the test is hard to write because of coupling, the code needs a better abstraction boundary. |
| "80% coverage is good enough" | Coverage targets are floors, not ceilings. The missing 20% often contains the error handling paths. |
| "These are just utility functions, they do not need tests" | Utility functions are the most reused code. A bug in a utility propagates everywhere. |
| "I ran the tests locally, CI will pass" | Environment differences cause CI-only failures. Trust CI output, not local runs. |
| "Flaky tests are normal, just re-run" | Flaky tests hide real failures. Fix the flakiness or quarantine the test explicitly. |
Shift Left: Find and fix defects as early as possible. Every test that runs in CI instead of locally adds latency. Every test that could have been a unit test but is an E2E test adds fragility.
Beyonce Rule: If you liked it, you should have put a test on it. Untested behavior is unspecified behavior.
t.Skip() or skip without an accompanying issue tracker link