Skip to main content

second-brain-privacy

Audit the vault for material that should not be in it: credentials, other people's private information, confidential work, and anything the user would not want synced or backed up. Use this skill when the user asks about privacy, is about to share or sync the vault, has just imported chat history or meeting notes, or asks what is sensitive in their notes. Do NOT use to delete anything on your own, or as a substitute for the publishing check.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
undefined-ui/second-brain-os
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月8日 00:15
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
1,094
フォーク
178

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
second-brain-privacy
description
Audit the vault for material that should not be in it: credentials, other people's private information, confidential work, and anything the user would not want synced or backed up. Use this skill when the user asks about privacy, is about to share or sync the vault, has just imported chat history or meeting notes, or asks what is sensitive in their notes. Do NOT use to delete anything on your own, or as a substitute for the publishing check.
# Audit privacy A mature vault is one of the highest-signal documents about a person that exists, and it lives in a folder that gets synced, committed, backed up and occasionally shared. Every copy is another place the content exists. ## Core rule Find and report. Delete nothing without an explicit instruction naming what to remove. ## Workflow 1. **Scan for credentials:** API keys, tokens, passwords, connection strings. Check `.obsidian/plugins/` too, where plugin data lives. 2. **Find other people's information:** meeting transcripts, personal messages, anything told in confidence, health or financial detail about someone else. 3. **Find confidential work:** material under NDA or employer restriction. 4. **Check the git remote.** Private material in a public repo is the most expensive version of this problem. 5. **Report by severity,** with the specific file and why. ## Output format ``` Critical: <credentials, must be removed and rotated> High: <other people's private information> Review: <material the user should decide about> Repo visibility: <public | private> - <verdict> ``` ## Calibration Never quote the credential itself in the report. Name the file and the type. Redaction after ingest is unreliable, because material has already propagated into concept pages and links. When something should not be there, say what else would need removing with it.
GitHubで見る