ワンクリックで
executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Use when defining new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or ambiguous medium/high-complexity work before implementation.
Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.
Use when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when strict TDD is explicitly requested, or when an approved atomic implementation task has already chosen TDD Route strict.
Use when the user says `aegis:update`, asks to update or upgrade an installed Aegis method-pack, wants the latest Aegis version, or asks whether Aegis is current on this host.
| name | executing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints |
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Aegis works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use aegis:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
If the plan has multiple tasks, may span sessions, or includes architecture / contract / workflow changes:
For each task:
Mark as in_progress
Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
Before any non-trivial source edit, run the plan's
Pre-Edit Complexity Check or create a compact one:
Pre-Edit Complexity Check:
- Safer edit boundary:
- Decision: edit-in-place | extract helper | add owner file | split task | pause for plan update
If the check contradicts the plan's file boundary, pause and return to plan review instead of silently stuffing logic into an overloaded owner.
Run verifications as specified
Update TodoCheckpointDraft and DriftCheckDraft before marking the task completed
Mark as completed
After all tasks complete and verified:
STOP executing immediately when:
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Required workflow skills: