same-page

name	same-page
description	<EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>You MUST use same-page when the user asks you to explain, clarify, or justify your previous messages.</EXTREMELY_IMPORTANT>

Same Page

Overview

Re-explain your previous message in plain language so the user fully understands it. Lead with a one-sentence answer, explain it through a concrete example the reader can picture, show one ASCII diagram, and end with a compact summary table. Keep the evidence-and-confidence discipline throughout, but express it compactly and inline inside the explanation — not as heavy per-claim blocks.

Announce at start: the equivalent, in the user's language, of "Let me make sure we're on the same page."

The Standard Shape

Use this shape every time. Trim it proportionally for a short prior message — a one-line point may need only the one-sentence version plus a small diagram — but do not invent a different structure.

1. Announce line (above).
2. ## The one-sentence version — the single plainest sentence that captures the answer. No jargon.
3. ## The plain story (name the heading to fit the topic) — explain the reasoning in plain, literal language, walking through a concrete example or scenario the reader can picture. Prefer ordinary words over technical terms; when a technical term is unavoidable, define it in the same sentence. State things directly. Carry the evidence inline here (see Evidence and Confidence).
4. One ASCII diagram — exactly one compact picture that reflects the real names and flow from the thread or codebase, with a one-line caption stating what to take away.
5. ## Bottom line — a compact summary table (the cases, the options, the before/after — whatever the message is about), then a one-line confidence note and any open question.

Evidence and Confidence

Every material claim must be supportable, expressed compactly inside the story rather than as a separate block:

• Cite a concrete artifact for each substantive claim: file:line, command output, URL, or a doc quote.
• Tag confidence inline where it matters: (High — verified at loop-resume.mjs:96).
• High — directly verified against source code, documentation, or runtime output.
• Medium — inferred from strong patterns or partial evidence; likely but not proven.
• Low — general knowledge, analogy, or assumption; could be wrong.
• If you cannot find evidence for something you said before, say so and retract or downgrade it.
• Re-read source files and re-run commands as needed. Do not rely on memory of earlier tool calls.

The ASCII Diagram

• Include exactly one (a small set only when true parallelism requires it).
• It MUST use the real names and flow from the discussion — not a generic stock picture.
• Keep it compact: aim under ~20 lines and ~72 columns for terminal readability.
• Pick the form that fits the content:
  • flow / sequence (boxes and arrows) for control or data flow;
  • tree or indented hierarchy for nesting or ownership;
  • layer / stack blocks for layers, stacks, or phases;
  • before/after sketch for a state change;
  • labeled graph (nodes + edges) for loose relationships.

Key Principles

• Plain language first — ordinary words, short sentences, a concrete example; define any unavoidable jargon in place.
• Literal, not figurative — state things directly; avoid metaphors and analogies when a literal explanation works.
• One-sentence answer up front — the reader should get the gist from the very first line.
• Evidence over assertion — compact inline citations and confidence, but never hand-waving.
• Honesty over completeness — prefer an explicit Low confidence over implied certainty.
• One strong picture — a single diagram that clarifies structure; skip decoration.
• Proportional length — trim the shape for a short message; do not pad.
• Re-verify, don't recall — re-read files and re-run checks rather than trusting memory of earlier tool output.