ワンクリックで
decision-matrix-mcda
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis calculator. Breaks complex decisions into weighted criteria with explicit scoring.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis calculator. Breaks complex decisions into weighted criteria with explicit scoring.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Unified business model evaluator, client filter, pricing engine, and distribution architect. Absorbs 31 business + 8 marketing + 13 content + 2 acquisition protocols.
Unified codebase manipulation, AI deployment, data analysis, and academic delivery engine. Absorbs 6 coding protocols + data-analysis + academic-delivery + spec-driven-dev.
Unified mathematical arbitrator for all resource allocation decisions — money, time, energy, relationships. Absorbs 46 decision protocols + 24 strategy protocols into one dense engine.
Unified survival infrastructure: health, finance, legal safety, circuit breakers, and structural protection against all ruin classes. The last line of defense.
Unified boundary enforcement, interpersonal diagnostic, and relational audit engine. Absorbs 40 psychology + 2 social protocols and all relationship case studies.
Unified zero-emotion variance shield for capital markets (FX, crypto, CFDs) and poker. Absorbs trading-risk-gate + zenith-execution + trade-journal-analyzer into one engine.
| name | Decision Matrix (MCDA) |
| description | Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis calculator. Breaks complex decisions into weighted criteria with explicit scoring. |
| created | "2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z" |
| auto-invoke | false |
| model | default |
| context_trigger | decision matrix, multi-criteria, MCDA, weighted scoring, trade-off analysis, alternatives, prioritization |
Philosophy: Complex decisions fail because people optimize for one variable while ignoring five others.
STEP 1: LIST OPTIONS
└─ Must have ≥2 distinct options (no straw men)
STEP 2: DEFINE CRITERIA
└─ List 3-7 evaluation criteria
└─ Each criterion must be measurable or scorable (1-10)
STEP 3: WEIGHT CRITERIA
└─ Assign percentage weights (must sum to 100%)
└─ Force-rank: "If you could only optimize for ONE criterion, which?"
STEP 4: SCORE EACH OPTION
└─ Score 1-10 per criterion per option
└─ Justify each score in one sentence
STEP 5: COMPUTE EEV
└─ EEV = Σ (Score × Weight) for each option
└─ Rank options by total EEV
STEP 6: SANITY CHECK
└─ Does the winner "feel" right?
└─ If not, a hidden criterion exists — surface it and re-run
# Decision: [Question]
## Criteria & Weights
| # | Criterion | Weight |
|---|-----------|--------|
| 1 | [Name] | [X]% |
| 2 | [Name] | [X]% |
## Scoring Matrix
| Option | C1 | C2 | C3 | **EEV** |
|--------|----|----|-----|---------|
| A | 8 | 6 | 7 | **7.1** |
| B | 5 | 9 | 4 | **6.2** |
## Recommendation
[Winner] with EEV of [X]. Key differentiator: [criterion].
## Sensitivity Analysis
If [criterion weight] changed by ±10%, would the winner change? [Yes/No]