학술

학술 연구, 인용 관리, 학술 글쓰기를 위한 에이전트 스킬을 탐색하세요. 학술 워크플로를 지원하세요.

openclaw/openclaw

Query Google Places for text search, place details, resolve, reviews, or scriptable JSON via goplaces.

pubmed-database

生物医学文献、MeSH クエリ、PMID 検索、引用取得、および API を利用した文献モニタリングのための PubMed および NCBI E-utilities の直接検索ワークフロー。

literature-review

学術、生物医学、技術、科学的なトピックに対するシステマティックな文献レビューワークフロー。検索計画、ソースのスクリーニング、統合、引用確認、証拠ログを含む。

scholar-evaluation

論文、提案書、文献レビュー、方法論セクション、証拠の質、引用サポート、研究論文フィードバックのための構造化された学術的作業評価。

Evidence-first current-state research workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants fresh facts, comparisons, enrichment, or a recommendation built from current public evidence and any supplied local context.

pubmed-database

Direct PubMed and NCBI E-utilities search workflows for biomedical literature, MeSH queries, PMID lookup, citation retrieval, and API-backed literature monitoring.

literature-review

Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.

scholar-evaluation

Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.

NousResearch/hermes-agent

Search arXiv papers by keyword, author, category, or ID.

Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF

Quiz the PR author on their own branch before they request review, to prove they actually understand the change - especially code an AI wrote for them. Scopes the branch diff vs its base, reads the changed code, then asks graded questions about what changed, why, how it works, what it could break, and which edge cases it must handle. Presents all questions first, waits for the author's answers, then grades each honestly against the real code (Correct / Partial / Incorrect with the true answer and file:line), scores it, and gives a readiness verdict that names the areas to re-study before asking humans to review. Use when asked to quiz me on my PR/branch, "test my understanding before review", a self-check gate before opening a PR, or before requesting reviewers. Administered as an interactive multiple-choice quiz (clickable options) by default; pass --free-text for written answers, --questions N to set count, --save to write a scorecard.

nexu-io/open-design

Recent community and social trend research over the last 30 days. Use when the brief asks what people are saying now, recent sentiment, community reactions, social proof, launch reaction, trend scan, or last-30-days context.

nexu-io/open-design

X/Twitter public sentiment research for recent market, company, product, or community discourse. Use when the brief asks what people are saying on X, Twitter sentiment, CT sentiment, public opinion, expert posts, or social reaction around a stock, sector, company, product, or market event.

frame-data-chart-nyt

nexu-io/open-design

NYT-newsroom typography, staggered reveal animation, and editorial-grade charts (line, bar, or range band).

hps-academic-paper

nexu-io/open-design

A review deck on compositional generalization in large language models — the field map, the gap, the evidence, and open questions. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for PI, lab group, reviewers.

nexu-io/open-design

Recent community and social trend research over the last 30 days. Use when the brief asks what people are saying now, recent sentiment, community reactions, social proof, launch reaction, trend scan, or last-30-days context.

nexu-io/open-design

X/Twitter public sentiment research for recent market, company, product, or community discourse. Use when the brief asks what people are saying on X, Twitter sentiment, CT sentiment, public opinion, expert posts, or social reaction around a stock, sector, company, product, or market event.

frame-data-chart-nyt

nexu-io/open-design

NYT-newsroom typography, staggered reveal animation, and editorial-grade charts (line, bar, or range band).

writing-guidelines

nexu-io/open-design

Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".

academic-paper-review

bytedance/deer-flow

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

zh-output-example

bytedance/deer-flow

Reviews Chinese skill documentation for publication readiness. Invoke when the user asks in Chinese to review a skill.

systematic-literature-review

bytedance/deer-flow

Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.

check-sanctions-pressure

koala73/worldmonitor

Retrieve normalized OFAC sanctions pressure — designation summaries, recent additions, and per-country/per-program aggregates including sanctioned vessels and aircraft. Use when the user asks which countries or programs face sanctions pressure, or what was recently designated.

PR triage: audit open PRs, deep review selected ones, draft and post review comments. Args: "all" to review all, PR numbers to focus (e.g. "42 57"), "en"/"fr" for language, no arg = audit only in French.

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

Use when auditing content pages for citation quality, suggesting authoritative sources to link for factual claims, or reviewing whether a page's external link attributes (nofollow, noopener) are correctly set.

pre-publish-review

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent

Nuclear-grade 16-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (5 agents) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent

Maximum-saturation research orchestration: parallel explore+librarian swarms across codebase, web, official docs, and OSS repos; a recursive EXPAND loop driven by leads workers return in message text; empirical verification by running code; cited synthesis and optional MD/HTML/PDF/PPTX reports. ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user demand for research — the word 'ulw-research' ('/ulw-research', '$ulw-research'), any 'ulw' research wording, or an explicit request for research / deep research / an ultra-precise investigation, in any language. Never self-activates for ordinary questions, debugging, or implementation context-gathering. While active it overrides exploration-bounding defaults: exhaustive coverage is the goal.

research-synthesize

Synthesize research findings from memory into structured reports with evidence grading, contradiction resolution, and actionable recommendations

asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

Deep research harness — fan-out web searches, fetch sources, adversarially verify claims, synthesize a cited report.

MemPalace/mempalace

Search your MemPalace — semantic search across all mined memories, projects, and conversations.

bmad-retrospective

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD

Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]"

bmad-advanced-elicitation

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD

Multi-lens review over any diff, doc, spec, or artifact — whichever installed lenses fit the content, run singly or together. Shipped lenses include adversarial, edge-case, verification-gap, structure, and prose. Use when the user says "review this", "critical review", "editorial review", "hunt edge cases", "review the structure", or "review the prose".

anthropics/claude-cookbooks

Audit an Anthropic Cookbook notebook based on a rubric. Use whenever a notebook review or audit is requested.

dotcom-release-crew

reviewing-pr-description

streamlit/streamlit

Evaluates a PR's title and description for readability — do they clearly and concisely convey what changed and why to a reviewer? Produces findings with concrete proposed rewrites; the caller decides whether to apply them or present them as feedback. Use when finalizing a PR or reviewing PR metadata. For code comments, docstrings, and naming, use reviewing-readability instead.

Hmbown/CodeWhale

Current external research using available web tools, primary sources where possible, links/citations, date awareness, synthesis, and unresolved uncertainty.

Hmbown/CodeWhale

Read-only correctness review with actionable findings first, tight file/line evidence, severity, and a concise residual-risk summary.

academic-paper-reviewer

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

academic-pipeline

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘.

postmortem-writing

wshobson/agents

Write effective blameless postmortems with root cause analysis, timelines, and action items. Use when conducting incident reviews, writing postmortem documents, or improving incident response processes.

performance-review-writer

github/awesome-copilot

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice. Analyzes your contributions, emails, and meeting history via WorkIQ, then produces honest, impact-focused drafts using the STAR format. USE FOR: write my performance review, draft self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, annual review, mid-year review, upward feedback, write review for colleague, performance appraisal.

github-pr-review-session

zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw

Human-reviewer co-pilot for ZeroClaw PR reviews. Use this skill when the user wants to review a specific PR as themselves, re-review a PR after author changes, work through a queue of PRs, check what's still open on a PR, or post a formal review verdict. Trigger on: 'review 1234', 'can you look at PR #1234', 're-review 1234', 'check 1234', 'what's still open on 1234', 'go through the queue', 'next PR', 'review the open PRs'. This skill posts reviews in the voice of the active `gh` account holder using gh CLI.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex

Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference boundaries. Use when a user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'why does', 'what's causing', or needs grounded cross-file explanation before any changes are proposed.

bgpt-paper-search

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.

citation-management

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.

literature-review

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).