| name | production-ready |
| description | Use when preparing any project for production deployment, performing security audits, or release preparation. Triggers on "make production ready", "security audit", "prepare for release", "hardening", "pre-deployment checklist". |
| metadata | {"version":"2.0.0","author":"skulto","tags":["security","deployment","production","audit","release"]} |
Production Ready
Comprehensive production readiness, security hardening, and professional release preparation for any project.
When to Use
- Before deploying to production for the first time
- After major changes before release
- When conducting security audits
- When open-sourcing a project
- During compliance reviews
- When onboarding to a new codebase
Quick Start
First, ask the user which mode:
Which level of audit do you need?
1. **Quick** - Fast CI-suitable checks (~2 min)
- Secret scanning
- Critical vulnerabilities only
2. **Security** - Deep security audit (~10 min)
- All vulnerability severities
- SBOM generation
- Configuration hardening
3. **Full** - Comprehensive audit (~15 min)
- All security checks
- Documentation review
- CI/CD validation
- Monitoring setup check
Step 1: Detect Tech Stack
Before scanning, identify the project's tech stack and dependencies:
ls -la | grep -E "package.json|requirements.txt|Cargo.toml|go.mod|Gemfile|pom.xml|build.gradle|composer.json|pubspec.yaml|*.csproj"
| File Detected | Stack | Primary Security Tools |
|---|
package.json | Node.js/JavaScript | npm audit, snyk, retire.js |
requirements.txt / pyproject.toml | Python | pip-audit, safety, bandit |
Cargo.toml | Rust | cargo-audit, cargo-deny |
go.mod | Go | govulncheck, gosec |
Gemfile | Ruby | bundle-audit, brakeman |
pom.xml / build.gradle | Java | OWASP Dependency-Check, SpotBugs |
composer.json | PHP | composer audit, phpstan |
*.csproj | .NET | dotnet list package --vulnerable |
pubspec.yaml | Dart/Flutter | dart pub outdated |
Step 2: Recommend Security Tools
Based on detected stack, recommend appropriate tools. ALWAYS ask the user before installing any tools.
Universal Tools (All Projects)
Free/Open-Source (Industry Standard):
| Tool | Purpose | Install Command |
|---|
| gitleaks | Secret detection in git history | brew install gitleaks or curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gitleaks/gitleaks/main/scripts/install.sh | sh |
| trufflehog | Deep secret scanning with verification | brew install trufflehog or curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/trufflesecurity/trufflehog/main/scripts/install.sh | sh |
| syft | SBOM generation | brew install syft or curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/syft/main/install.sh | sh |
| grype | Vulnerability scanner (multi-language) | brew install grype or curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/grype/main/install.sh | sh |
| trivy | Comprehensive security scanner | brew install trivy or see trivy docs |
| semgrep | Static analysis (SAST) | brew install semgrep or pip install semgrep |
Paid/Enterprise (State of the Art):
| Tool | Purpose | Notes |
|---|
| Snyk | Full-spectrum security (SCA, SAST, containers) | Free tier available, enterprise features paid |
| Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle | Enterprise dependency management | Industry leader in SCA |
| Checkmarx | Enterprise SAST/DAST | Comprehensive enterprise solution |
| Veracode | Application security platform | Enterprise-grade scanning |
| GitHub Advanced Security | Integrated security (CodeQL, Dependabot) | Native GitHub integration |
Language-Specific Tools
JavaScript/Node.js:
Python:
Go:
Rust:
Ruby:
Java:
Step 3: Ask User to Install Tools
CRITICAL: ALWAYS ask the user before installing any tools.
Present the recommended tools based on detected stack:
I've detected your project uses [STACK]. Here are the recommended security scanning tools:
**Required (Universal):**
- gitleaks - Secret detection
- grype - Vulnerability scanning
- syft - SBOM generation
**Stack-Specific ([STACK]):**
- [tool1] - [purpose]
- [tool2] - [purpose]
**Optional (Enhanced Coverage):**
- trivy - Comprehensive scanner
- semgrep - Static analysis
Would you like me to install these tools?
1. Yes, install all recommended tools
2. Yes, but only the required universal tools
3. Let me select which ones to install
4. No, I'll install them manually
If user selects option 1, 2, or 3: Proceed with installation using the appropriate package manager, then continue to Step 4.
If user selects option 4: Provide installation commands and proceed to Step 4 when they confirm tools are installed.
Step 4: Run Security Scans
Execute scans based on installed tools and audit mode:
Quick Mode
gitleaks detect --source=. --no-banner
grype dir:. --fail-on=critical --only-fixed
Security Mode (includes Quick)
trufflehog filesystem . --only-verified
grype dir:. --fail-on=high --only-fixed
syft dir:. -o cyclonedx-json=sbom.json
semgrep --config auto --error
Full Mode (includes Security)
All security checks plus documentation, CI/CD, and observability validation.
Step 5: Generate Report
Reports MUST be written to docs/reports/ directory.
Create the directory if it doesn't exist:
mkdir -p docs/reports
Generate a markdown report with today's date:
REPORT_FILE="docs/reports/security-audit-$(date +%Y-%m-%d).md"
Report Template
The generated report should follow this structure:
# Security Audit Report
**Project:** [project-name]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Audit Mode:** [Quick|Security|Full]
**Auditor:** Claude Code (production-ready skill)
## Executive Summary
- **Total Checks:** X
- **Passed:** X
- **Failed:** X
- **Warnings:** X
## Tech Stack Detected
- Primary Language: [language]
- Package Manager: [manager]
- Frameworks: [frameworks]
## Tools Used
| Tool | Version | Purpose |
|------|---------|---------|
| gitleaks | X.X.X | Secret detection |
| grype | X.X.X | Vulnerability scanning |
| ... | ... | ... |
## Findings
### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
1. **[Issue Title]**
- Severity: Critical
- Location: [file:line]
- Description: [description]
- Remediation: [steps to fix]
### High Severity Issues
...
### Medium/Low Severity Issues
...
## Dependency Vulnerabilities
| Package | Current | Fixed In | Severity | CVE |
|---------|---------|----------|----------|-----|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## SBOM Summary
- Total Packages: X
- Direct Dependencies: X
- Transitive Dependencies: X
- SBOM Location: `docs/reports/sbom-[date].json`
## Recommendations
1. [Prioritized recommendation]
2. [Prioritized recommendation]
...
## Next Steps
- [ ] Fix critical vulnerabilities
- [ ] Review and remediate high-severity issues
- [ ] Update dependencies with known fixes
- [ ] Re-run audit after fixes
---
*Generated by production-ready skill v2.0.0*
Audit Mode Checklists
Quick Mode Checklist
Security Mode Checklist (includes Quick)
Full Mode Checklist (includes Security)
Documentation:
CI/CD:
Observability:
Operational:
Generate Report: Write comprehensive findings to docs/reports/security-audit-[date].md
Web Search for Latest Tools
If the detected tech stack requires specialized tools not listed above, search the internet for current (2025+) industry-standard security scanners for that specific technology. Prioritize:
- Tools recommended by official language/framework documentation
- OWASP-recommended tools
- Tools with active maintenance (commits in last 6 months)
- Tools with significant GitHub stars (>1000) and community adoption
Security Standards Reference
Based on OWASP Top 10 2025:
| Risk | Key Mitigations |
|---|
| A01: Broken Access Control | Deny by default, validate permissions server-side |
| A02: Security Misconfiguration | Automated hardening, remove defaults, security headers |
| A03: Supply Chain | SBOM, dependency scanning, signed builds |
| A04: Injection | Parameterized queries, input validation |
| A05: Cryptographic Failures | TLS everywhere, strong algorithms, no hardcoded keys |
Common Issues & Fixes
Secrets Found
git filter-branch --force --index-filter \
"git rm --cached --ignore-unmatch PATH/TO/FILE" \
--prune-empty --tag-name-filter cat -- --all
bfg --delete-files "*.env"
Vulnerable Dependencies
npm update PACKAGE
pip install PACKAGE --upgrade
cargo update PACKAGE
Exit Criteria
The project is production-ready when:
- Zero high/critical vulnerabilities with available fixes
- Zero hardcoded secrets detected
- All required documentation present
- CI/CD pipeline passes all security checks
- SBOM generated and stored in
docs/reports/
- Health checks operational
- Security audit report generated in
docs/reports/security-audit-[date].md
References
See references/ directory for:
research.md - Detailed research findings
sources.md - Authoritative sources and links