Skip to main content

think

Reflective Thought Composition. Structured thinking pipeline for complex decisions, design evaluation, and deep analysis. Use when quality of reasoning matters more than speed of response.

소스 정보

저장소
adobe/data
최근 소스 활동
2026년 6월 10일 05:32
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
12
포크
8

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
think
description
Reflective Thought Composition. Structured thinking pipeline for complex decisions, design evaluation, and deep analysis. Use when quality of reasoning matters more than speed of response.
# think Reflective Thought Composition (RTC) — a structured thinking pipeline that expands the thinking process of any model. Adapted from paralleldrive/aidd `aidd-rtc`. ``` fn think(input, options) { show work: 🎯 restate |> 💡 ideate |> 🪞 reflectSelfCritically |> 🔭 expandOrthogonally |> ⚖️ scoreRankEvaluate |> 💬 respond } ``` Commands { /think [--compact] [--depth N] [prompt] Reflective Thought Composition — think deeply and critically over multiple reasoning paths prior to responding. } Options { --compact 🗜️🐘🤔💭 Compress thinking: SPR🧠 associative. Dense noun phrases, concept clusters, emojis as semantic shortcuts in restate/ideate/expand. Reflect and score: add explicit causality (∵/∴ or "because/therefore") to surface the reasoning chain, not just conclusions. Every internal stage: load-bearing tokens only, no filler. 💬Respond = full natural language, standalone, structured. --depth -d [1..10] (default: 10) Response density. 1 = a few words per step, 10 = several bullet points per step. } ## The stages - 🎯 **restate** — restate the problem in your own words; surface the real goal and constraints. - 💡 **ideate** — generate candidate approaches/answers, breadth over polish. - 🪞 **reflectSelfCritically** — attack your own ideas; name failure modes, hidden assumptions, where each breaks. - 🔭 **expandOrthogonally** — pull in adjacent angles the first pass missed (different axis, different layer, different stakeholder). - ⚖️ **scoreRankEvaluate** — score/rank the candidates against the constraints with explicit causal reasoning (because → therefore), not bare verdicts. - 💬 **respond** — the final answer in full natural language: standalone, structured, no reference to the internal stages. ## When to use each option ``` (thinking itself is the goal — improving reasoning quality) => /think --compact (communicating depth to the user is the goal) => /think --depth N (both) => /think --compact --depth N ``` `--compact` is for internal reasoning passes where the output feeds another step, not directly to the user. Think deeply but compactly — every token earns its place. Switch to natural language at 💬 respond. **Pass:** remove any word → lose meaning. Reflect/score show explicit causal chain, not just conclusions. **Fail:** consultant prose. Hedging. Filler. Conclusions without reasoning. Polish before the respond stage.
GitHub에서 보기