Skip to main content

rnaseq-count-qc

Validate public bulk RNA-seq raw gene-count matrices and produce traceable sample QC summaries before differential-expression analysis.

소스 정보

저장소
aipoch/openscience-wiki
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 16일 09:46
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
4
포크
6

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
rnaseq-count-qc
description
Validate public bulk RNA-seq raw gene-count matrices and produce traceable sample QC summaries before differential-expression analysis.
# RNA-seq count quality check ## Inputs Use the file attached to the current session. Ask for a source accession or URL when absent. Do not infer sample conditions from shortened column names. Read references/sample-metric-schema.md for the output schema when it is accessible; if a resource cannot be opened, report that limitation and follow the explicit requirements below. ## Procedure 1. Keep the source unchanged. Record its exact managed path, source accession and SHA-256 before and after the calculation. 2. Inspect the delimiter, header and dimensions. Preserve the original sample identifiers. In GSE60450, EntrezGeneID and Length are metadata, not samples. 3. Check duplicate or missing gene identifiers, missing entries, unequal row lengths and negative or non-integer counts. Stop and report affected rows if the count matrix fails these checks; never silently replace missing counts with zero. 4. Use an available Python or R Session Notebook. No new packages are needed for this descriptive check. Compute total_raw_counts, zero_count_genes, detected_genes (count > 0), and median_detected_count for each sample. 5. Save a new CSV and a short methods report through supported artifact operations. Keep the mapping from plot labels to original sample identifiers when creating a chart. 6. Reopen the outputs and check sample count, metric values and unchanged source checksum. Distinguish actual checks from unexecuted suggestions. ## Interpretation Raw-count QC is descriptive. It does not test differential expression, establish clinical relevance or determine quality thresholds without a stated study design. Report missing annotations and unresolved input access rather than inventing them.
GitHub에서 보기