Skip to main content

code-reviewer

Automatic code quality and best practices analysis. Use proactively when files are modified, saved, or committed. Analyzes code style, patterns, potential bugs, and security basics. Triggers on file changes, git diff, code edits, quality mentions.

소스 정보

저장소
alirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor
최근 소스 활동
2025년 10월 24일 16:32
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
777
포크
169

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
code-reviewer
description
Automatic code quality and best practices analysis. Use proactively when files are modified, saved, or committed. Analyzes code style, patterns, potential bugs, and security basics. Triggers on file changes, git diff, code edits, quality mentions.
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob
# Code Reviewer Skill Lightweight automatic code quality checks while you code. ## When I Activate - ✅ Files modified or saved - ✅ Git diff run - ✅ Code mentioned in conversation - ✅ User asks about code quality - ✅ Before commits ## What I Check ### Quick Wins - Code style and formatting issues - Common anti-patterns - Obvious bugs (null checks, undefined references) - Basic security patterns (hardcoded secrets) - Import/export issues - Unused variables and functions ### What I Don't Do - Deep architectural review → Use **@code-reviewer** sub-agent - Comprehensive security audit → Use **security-auditor** skill - Performance profiling → Use **@architect** sub-agent - Full refactoring plans → Use **@code-reviewer** sub-agent ## Relationship with @code-reviewer Sub-Agent **Me (Skill):** Fast, lightweight, real-time feedback **@code-reviewer (Sub-Agent):** Deep analysis with examples and strategy ### Workflow 1. You write code 2. I auto-analyze (instant feedback) 3. I flag: "⚠️ Potential issue on line 42" 4. You want details → Invoke **@code-reviewer** sub-agent 5. Sub-agent provides comprehensive analysis ## Analysis Examples ### JavaScript/TypeScript ```javascript // You write this code: function getUser(id) { return db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${id}`); } // I immediately flag: // 🚨 Line 2: SQL injection vulnerability // 💡 Use parameterized queries ``` ### React ```javascript // You write: function UserList({ users }) { return users.map(user => <User data={user} />); } // I flag: // ⚠️ Missing key prop in list rendering (line 2) // 💡 Add key={user.id} to User component ``` ### Python ```python # You write: def process_data(data): return data['user']['profile']['name'] # I flag: # ⚠️ Potential KeyError - no safety checks (line 2) # 💡 Use .get() or add try/except ``` ## Check Categories ### Code Style - Inconsistent naming conventions - Missing semicolons (JavaScript) - Improper indentation - Long functions (>50 lines) - Magic numbers ### Potential Bugs - Null/undefined access without checks - Array access without bounds checking - Type mismatches (TypeScript) - Unreachable code - Infinite loops ### Basic Security - Hardcoded API keys or secrets - SQL injection patterns - eval() or exec() usage - Insecure random number generation - Missing input validation ### Best Practices - Missing error handling - Console.log in production code - Commented-out code blocks - TODO comments without context - Overly complex conditions ## Output Format ``` 🤖 code-reviewer skill: [Severity] Issue description (file:line) 💡 Quick fix suggestion 📖 Reference: [link to learn more] ``` ### Severity Levels - 🚨 **CRITICAL**: Must fix (security, data loss) - ⚠️ **HIGH**: Should fix (bugs, performance) - 📋 **MEDIUM**: Consider fixing (maintainability) - 💡 **LOW**: Nice to have (style, readability) ## When to Invoke Sub-Agent After I flag issues, invoke **@code-reviewer** sub-agent for: - Detailed explanation of the issue - Multiple fix alternatives with pros/cons - Architectural recommendations - Refactoring strategies - Best practice guidelines **Example:** ``` Me: "⚠️ Potential N+1 query detected" You: "@code-reviewer explain the N+1 issue and show optimal solution" Sub-agent: [Provides comprehensive analysis with examples] ``` ## Sandboxing Compatibility **Works without sandboxing:** ✅ Yes (default, recommended for learning) **Works with sandboxing:** ✅ Yes (no special configuration needed) - **Filesystem**: Read-only access to project files - **Network**: None required - **Configuration**: None required ## Customization Want different checks or patterns? 1. Copy this skill: ```bash cp -r ~/.claude/skills/development/code-reviewer ~/.claude/skills/development/my-code-reviewer ``` 2. Edit `SKILL.md`: - Modify `description` to adjust triggers - Customize check categories - Add language-specific patterns 3. Restart Claude Code: ```bash claude --restart ``` See [../../TEMPLATES.md](../../TEMPLATES.md) for customization guide. ## Examples in Action ### TypeScript Function ```typescript // Before: async function fetchUsers(ids) { const users = []; for (let id of ids) { const user = await User.findById(id); // N+1 query! users.push(user); } return users; } // I flag: // ⚠️ N+1 query pattern detected (line 4) // 💡 Use User.findByIds(ids) for batch loading // After fix: async function fetchUsers(ids) { return await User.findByIds(ids); } ``` ### React Component ```jsx // Before: function UserCard({ user }) { const [data, setData] = useState(); useEffect(() => { fetch(`/api/users/${user.id}`) .then(res => res.json()) .then(setData); }, []); // Missing dependency! return <div>{data?.name}</div>; } // I flag: // ⚠️ useEffect dependency array incomplete (line 6) // 💡 Add user.id to dependencies: [user.id] // After fix: useEffect(() => { fetch(`/api/users/${user.id}`) .then(res => res.json()) .then(setData); }, [user.id]); ``` ## Integration with /review Command The `/review` command aggregates my findings with deep sub-agent analysis: ```bash /review --scope staged --checks all # Command workflow: # 1. Collects my automatic findings # 2. Invokes @code-reviewer sub-agent for deep analysis # 3. Invokes @security-auditor sub-agent # 4. Generates comprehensive report with priorities ``` ## Performance Impact - **Activation time**: < 100ms - **Analysis time**: < 1 second per file - **Memory usage**: Minimal (read-only) - **Background operation**: Non-blocking This skill operates asynchronously and won't slow down your coding workflow. ## Language Support ### Fully Supported - JavaScript/TypeScript (ES6+, React, Node.js) - Python (3.8+, Django, FastAPI) - Java (Spring Boot patterns) - Go (standard patterns) ### Partial Support - Ruby, PHP, C#, Rust - Framework-agnostic patterns apply Want to add language-specific patterns? See customization guide above. ## Tips for Best Results 1. **Write code first, then review** - Let me catch issues as you go 2. **Don't ignore warnings** - Each flagged issue is worth reviewing 3. **Use sub-agent for learning** - Invoke @code-reviewer to understand "why" 4. **Customize for your stack** - Add project-specific patterns 5. **Combine with /review** - Use command for comprehensive pre-commit checks ## Related Tools - **security-auditor skill**: Deeper security vulnerability scanning - **test-generator skill**: Auto-suggest tests for your code - **@code-reviewer sub-agent**: Comprehensive code review with examples - **/review command**: Full workflow with multiple agents ## Learn More - Architecture: [../../../ARCHITECTURE.md](../../../ARCHITECTURE.md) - Templates: [../../TEMPLATES.md](../../TEMPLATES.md) - Sub-agents: [../../../agents/README.md](../../../agents/README.md)
GitHub에서 보기