ai-resolve-conflicts

name	ai-resolve-conflicts
description	Resolves git conflicts intent-aware: categorizes by type (lock files, migrations, generated, config, code), regenerates or merges per category, never blindly accepts. Trigger for 'I have conflicts', 'rebase failed', 'merge conflict', 'cherry-pick failed', 'unmerged paths'. Not for branch hygiene; use /ai-branch-cleanup instead. Not for committing the resolution; use /ai-commit instead.
effort	cheap
argument-hint

Resolve Conflicts

Intent-aware git conflict resolution: detect the operation, categorize files by strategy (lock, migration, generated, config, code), and resolve with awareness of both sides — never blindly accept. Use it whenever git status shows unmerged paths after a rebase, merge, cherry-pick, or revert.

/ai-resolve-conflicts     # auto-detect and resolve current conflicts

Workflow

Principles: §10.1 KISS (category-routing over a single generic merge); §10.4 DRY (regenerate lock/generated files rather than hand-merge).

1. Detect operation in progress:

   test -d .git/rebase-merge || test -d .git/rebase-apply  # rebase
   test -f .git/MERGE_HEAD                                  # merge
   test -f .git/CHERRY_PICK_HEAD                            # cherry-pick
   test -f .git/REVERT_HEAD                                 # revert
   

2. List conflicts — git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U.

3. Categorize each file:

   Category	File patterns	Strategy
   Lock files	*.lock, poetry.lock, Cargo.lock, package-lock.json, uv.lock	Accept theirs, regenerate
   Migrations	migrations/, alembic/versions/	Ask user (order matters)
   Generated	*.min.js, *.min.css, dist/, build/	Accept theirs, rebuild
   Config	*.yml, *.toml, *.json (non-lock)	AI merge with validation
   Code	everything else	AI analysis

4. Resolve by category:

   • Lock files — git checkout --theirs <lockfile>, then regenerate (npm install / cargo generate-lockfile / uv lock).
   • Migrations — present both sides + migration graph; ask which order (never auto-resolve — ordering is semantic).
   • Config — merge preserving both sides' additions; validate against schema if available.
   • Code — per hunk: (a) read 50 lines context each side, (b) identify intent per side, (c) check commit messages, (d) propose resolution preserving both intents, (e) if intents conflict, present options to the user.

5. Stacked-PR detection — compare base/HEAD/incoming similarity; on high overlap, likely a stacked-PR rebase → prefer incoming (later branch) and warn about cascade to downstream branches.

6. Validate — git diff to review; run stack-specific checks (build/lint/test); present a summary before continuing.

7. Continue — git add <resolved-files>, then git rebase --continue (or merge/revert/cherry-pick --continue). If new conflicts appear (common in multi-commit rebases), loop back to step 1 until the operation completes.

Examples

User: "merge conflict in src/auth.ts, both branches changed the token validator"

/ai-resolve-conflicts

Reads both sides, categorizes as code, applies intent-aware resolution (preserves both validators if non-overlapping; otherwise asks the user with a unified diff), stages, continues the operation.

Integration

Called by: /ai-pr watch-and-fix loop (CI repair), user directly. Calls: git (rebase / merge / cherry-pick continuation), package managers (lock-file regeneration). See also: /ai-branch-cleanup (after resolution), /ai-commit (commit the resolved state).

$ARGUMENTS