소스 정보
- 저장소
- asermax/claude-plugins
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 2월 8일 18:28
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1
- 포크
- 1
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill optimize-docs명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | optimize-docs |
| description | Analyze docs for optimization opportunities (split, simplify, remove) |
| argument-hint | [scope] |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Analyze documentation for optimization opportunities, including splitting long documents, reducing verbosity, and identifying obsolete or redundant content.
Scope: $ARGUMENTS (optional - flexible scope for analysis)
Scope interpretation:
You must load the following skills and read the following files before proceeding.
katachi:framework-core - Workflow principles and project structuredocs/feature-specs/README.md - Feature capability indexdocs/feature-designs/README.md - Feature design indexdocs/architecture/README.md - Architecture decisions (ADRs)docs/design/README.md - Design patterns (DES)${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/working-on-delta/references/feature-spec.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/working-on-delta/references/feature-design.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/framework-core/references/ADR-template.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/framework-core/references/DES-template.mdVerify framework is initialized:
docs/planning/ doesn't exist, explain this command requires an initialized katachi frameworkIf no scope provided:
If topic scope provided (e.g., "auth"):
If file path provided:
If directory provided:
Group discovered documents for parallel processing.
Always dispatch doc-optimizer agents to analyze discovered documents:
For each agent, provide:
Analyze these documents for optimization opportunities.
## Documents to Analyze
[list of file paths with brief descriptions]
## Document Type
[feature-specs / feature-designs / architecture / design]
## Template Reference
[relevant template content for structure compliance]
## Analysis Focus
Provide actionable guidance on:
1. Document Length: Files that should split (>400 lines features, >150 decisions)
2. Verbosity: Repetitive phrasing, over-explanation, redundancy
3. Obsolescence: Orphaned docs, superseded content, obsolete documents
4. Structure: Missing required sections, incorrect format
For each issue found, provide:
- Specific file and location (line numbers when relevant)
- Clear explanation of the problem
- Actionable recommendation for improvement
Wait for all agent responses and synthesize findings into a single report organized by action type:
Show the aggregated report with clear categorization:
## Document Optimization Report
### Candidates for Splitting
- docs/feature-specs/auth.md (523 lines)
- Contains 3 distinct authentication methods that should be separate
- Suggested: auth/login.md, auth/oauth.md, auth/mfa.md
- Each method has independent user stories, flows, and acceptance criteria
### Verbosity Reduction Opportunities
- docs/feature-designs/api.md (312 lines → est. 180 lines)
- Lines 45-60, 89-104, 145-160, 201-216: "API first" explanation repeated 4 times
- Consider extracting to DES-XXX or consolidating into single reference section
### Candidates for Removal
- docs/feature-designs/old-workflow.md
- Not referenced in feature-designs/README.md
- Content describes deprecated workflow
### Orphaned Documents
- docs/architecture/old-db-choice.md (superseded by ADR-003)
- Marked as superseded, no active references in other docs
### Structure Issues
- docs/feature-specs/projects.md missing User Flows section
- This is a UI capability - should include breadboards or add exclusion note
After presenting the report, ask:
"Which optimization would you like to address?
1. Split long documents
2. Reduce verbosity / consolidate content
3. Remove obsolete documents
4. Fix orphaned documents
5. Fix structure issues
6. All of the above
Or provide specific items to address."
For splits:
For verbosity reduction:
For removals:
For orphaned documents:
For structure fixes:
Apply changes incrementally with user approval for each action or category.
Track all changes made:
After all optimizations are complete, dispatch the optimization-validator agent to verify no data was lost:
Validate the following document optimizations preserve all relevant information.
## Modified Files
[list of modified file paths]
## New Files (from splits)
[list of new file paths and their source files]
## Deleted Files
[list of deleted file paths]
Use git to retrieve original versions and compare with current state.
Apply corrections automatically if content was lost.
Ask only if uncertain how to fix.
If validation returns NEEDS_WORK:
After completing optimizations:
"Optimization complete!
Changes made:
- [summary of splits, deletions, consolidations, fixes]
Next steps:
- Index files may need updating if structure changed
- Consider running /katachi:analyze to verify no gaps introduced
- Related deltas may need documentation updates"
This command integrates with:
/katachi:analyze - Complementary: analyze finds gaps, optimize finds improvement opportunities/katachi:decision - For extracting discovered patterns into DES documents/katachi:spec-delta / /katachi:design-delta - For updating delta working documentsThis is an optimization command: