소스 정보
- 저장소
- asermax/claude-plugins
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 3월 30일 03:12
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 1
- 포크
- 1
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill review-priorities명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
Build something already designed, together with the user, then verify it and offer to commit. Use when a design is agreed and the work is ready to write, or when another skill needs the shared build discipline.
Load first when working with any zenku skill. Carries the vocabulary, the two rules, how to find the project's vault and conventions, and the habits for writing into it.
Lay out the current shape so the user can settle a new one — which modules exist, where the seams are, how data flows, and what earlier quests already decided. Use when the user wants to design a feature or a module, work out an interface, decide where a boundary belongs, or when another skill needs a shape agreed before code.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | review-priorities |
| description | Conversational session to review and assign delta priorities |
| argument-hint | |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
A conversational discovery session to assess and assign delta priorities holistically.
When you have multiple deltas and need to determine what to work on, this command helps you:
You must load the following skills and read the following files before proceeding.
katachi:framework-core - Workflow principles and priority trackingdocs/planning/DELTAS.md - All deltas with current status and priorityVerify framework is initialized:
docs/planning/ doesn't exist, suggest /katachi:init-framework firstGather the full picture:
# Get summary of all deltas
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py summary
# Get priority breakdown
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority list
# Get ready deltas
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py ready
Summarize the current state for the user. Always refer to deltas by their title with the ID in parentheses — never by bare ID.
"Here's your current delta landscape:
**Status:**
- X ready to work on
- Y in progress
- Z blocked by dependencies
**Priority Distribution:**
- Critical (1): N deltas
- High (2): N deltas
- Medium (3): N deltas [includes X at default]
- Low (4): N deltas
- Backlog (5): N deltas
**Observations:**
- [High-impact blockers: deltas that block many others, referenced by title (ID)]
- [Deltas without explicit priority: still at default 3, referenced by title (ID)]
- [Any obvious inconsistencies]
Let's discuss your current priorities."
Ask about the user's current context. Ask ONE question at a time and wait for the answer.
Goal-oriented questions:
Constraint-oriented questions:
Clarification questions (as needed):
Based on the conversation, draft a priority proposal:
"Based on our discussion, I suggest:
**Critical (1):**
- User authentication (DLT-015) - blocks 5 other deltas, aligns with your deadline
**High (2):**
- API refactor (DLT-008) - needed before auth, currently blocking
- Error handling (DLT-012) - you mentioned reliability focus
**Medium (3):** (unchanged)
- Email validation (DLT-003), Session management (DLT-007)
**Low (4):**
- UI polish (DLT-001) - nice to have, no urgency
**Backlog (5):**
- Advanced analytics (DLT-002) - explicitly deferred
Does this align with your thinking? Any adjustments?"
Dispatch the priority-reviewer agent to check for inconsistencies:
Task(
subagent_type="katachi:priority-reviewer",
prompt=f"""
Review these priority assignments for consistency.
## Proposed Priorities
{priority_assignments}
## Dependency Matrix
{dependency_info}
## User Goals
{stated_goals}
Check for:
- Priority inversions (high priority blocked by low priority)
- Bottlenecks (high-impact deltas with low priority)
- Goal alignment
"""
)
If the reviewer finds issues, present them to the user and iterate.
Once confirmed, apply the changes:
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority set DLT-015 1
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority set DLT-008 2
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority set DLT-012 2
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority set DLT-001 4
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py priority set DLT-002 5
Present the final state:
"Priorities updated:
**Changes made:**
- User authentication (DLT-015): 3 → 1 (Critical)
- API refactor (DLT-008): 3 → 2 (High)
- Error handling (DLT-012): 3 → 2 (High)
- UI polish (DLT-001): 3 → 4 (Low)
- Advanced analytics (DLT-002): 3 → 5 (Backlog)
**Suggested next delta:**
[Run `next` command and show result]
**Next actions:**
- Start work: /katachi:spec-delta [suggested delta]
- Review later: /katachi:review-priorities
"
This is a discovery session, not a checklist:
Focus on understanding context:
Validate before applying:
No deltas exist:
/katachi:init-framework or /katachi:add-deltaUser is unsure about goals:
Too many changes: