Designs and normalises a balanced leading/lagging HSE KPI framework for a named organisation, function, or site against ISO 45001:2018 clause 9.1 — never a lagging-only set. Each indicator is fully defined (formula, source, frequency, owner, target); a lagging-only request is flagged for balance and a gameable metric (raw incident count as a target) with no safeguard is flagged for defensibility. Carries a road-safety leading-indicator branch (ISO 39001:2012) when the scope is road/transport/fleet. It DESIGNS the indicator set — distinct from incident-rate-calculator (which computes given rates) and process-safety-kpi (API RP 754 tiers), which it references as exemplars, not replacements. Lagging rates are computed by the incident_rates engine to standard definitions, never invented. Decision-support only; a competent person must review the output.
Designs and normalises a balanced leading/lagging HSE KPI framework for a named organisation, function, or site against ISO 45001:2018 clause 9.1 — never a lagging-only set. Each indicator is fully defined (formula, source, frequency, owner, target); a lagging-only request is flagged for balance and a gameable metric (raw incident count as a target) with no safeguard is flagged for defensibility. Carries a road-safety leading-indicator branch (ISO 39001:2012) when the scope is road/transport/fleet. It DESIGNS the indicator set — distinct from incident-rate-calculator (which computes given rates) and process-safety-kpi (API RP 754 tiers), which it references as exemplars, not replacements. Lagging rates are computed by the incident_rates engine to standard definitions, never invented. Decision-support only; a competent person must review the output.
A consultant-grade HSE skill that designs and normalises a balanced leading/lagging
KPI framework for a named organisation, function, or site against ISO 45001:2018
clause 9.1 (monitoring, measurement, analysis & performance evaluation). It forces the
single lever that separates a defensible measurement set from copy-paste paperwork:
balance and specificity — a lagging-only set (e.g. TRIR alone) is flagged as a
reactive-only picture, and (formula · source ·
frequency · owner · target). A — a raw incident count as a target,
which incentivises under-reporting — is flagged for defensibility unless paired with a
quality/assurance safeguard. It grounds in (method) and the
single-source catalogue, maps to clause 9.1 via the shared
, and computes any lagging through the
deterministic engine (anchors TRIR 2.07 / LTIFR 6.00), never inventing a
figure. It carries a (,
ISO 39001:2012) that activates when the scope is road / transport / fleet — one skill, the
single home of road-safety KPIs. This skill the indicator set: it is distinct
from (which given rates), (API
RP 754 tiers) and (ICAO Annex 19), which it references as
domain , never replacing them. Decision-support only; a competent person must
review the output.
## Output format
every indicator is fully defined
gameable metric
KB-SNIP-KPI-DESIGN
KB-DATA-LEADING-INDICATORS
KB-SNIP-LEADERSHIP-CLAUSE-MAP
rate
incident_rates
road-safety EXTEND branch
KB-DATA-ROAD-SAFETY-INDICATORS
designs
incident-rate-calculator
computes
process-safety-kpi
aviation-spi-spt-framework
exemplars
When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user needs to design, normalise, or rebalance a set of HSE
KPIs / safety performance indicators for a named organisation, function, or site — for
example "build a balanced leading and lagging KPI dashboard for our manufacturing
division", "our scorecard is TRIR-only — design the leading indicators we're missing",
"define each of these metrics properly (formula, owner, target)", or "set up road-safety
KPIs for our fleet". Trigger phrases: leading indicators, lagging indicators, KPI
framework, safety performance indicators, balanced scorecard, ISO 45001 clause 9.1
monitoring & measurement, anti-gaming metrics, road-safety / fleet KPIs (ISO 39001).
This skill designs / normalises the indicator set — it does not compute a given
injury rate (that is incident-rate-calculator), own the API RP 754 process-safety tiers
(process-safety-kpi) or the ICAO Annex 19 aviation SPIs (aviation-spi-spt-framework);
intake Q1 disambiguates against those calculators/exemplars and against the leadership
siblings safety-culture-assessment, bbs-program-designer, and safety-walk-gemba. If
the request is a lagging-only set, or a gameable metric with no safeguard, or an
indicator with no definition, the Workflow intake below forces balance, a safeguard, and a
full definition before any drafting.
Data Protection & De-identification (MANDATORY — apply before drafting)
Apply this BEFORE you draft anything. Treat injury, illness, and any health
detail as the highest sensitivity. Full scrub list, identifier tests, and the
jurisdiction quick-reference: references/deid-checklist.md.
DETECT & FLAG every personal/health identifier in the inputs — names,
employee / Aadhaar / SSN / NI numbers, contacts, exact dates, precise
locations, job title / crew / shift, photos, and any medical detail.
List what you found before drafting. If unsure whether something is
identifying, treat it as identifying.
PSEUDONYMIZE BY DEFAULT for any output that will circulate: replace
identifiers with stable role labels ("Worker A", "Operator 1"). Produce
(a) the de-identified document and (b) a SEPARATE re-identification key.
Never put the key or any name↔label mapping in the document. Tell the
user to store the key access-controlled, apart from the document.
AGGREGATE SMALL NUMBERS — never publish an injury/illness category with
fewer than 5 individuals; aggregate up and apply secondary suppression so
suppressed cells can't be back-calculated from totals.
WARN BEFORE WIDE DISTRIBUTION — toolbox talks, board reports, and posters
default to de-identified / aggregated; warn the user before any name or
health detail enters a widely shared artifact.
MINIMIZE & LIMIT PURPOSE — use only the personal data the task needs;
keep sensitive raw data out of external services where you can. When in
doubt, ask before including it.
Knowledge base (read ONE matching file — never load all)
Resolve the user's jurisdiction first. Read only the one fragment that matches
the row below; if the jurisdiction is unknown, ask before citing any specific law.
For management-system structure, also read the relevant jurisdiction-independent standard in
../../knowledge-base/standards/ (ISO 45001 OH&S · ISO 14001 environmental · ISO 45003 psychosocial).
Always apply ../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/hierarchy-of-controls.md (KB-SNIP-HOC)
to every control recommendation. For any benchmark/figure, look up the ID in the relevant
_registry.yaml, then read ONLY the named file — and quote its source+year.
This skill is method-led, not law-led: balanced KPI design is a management-system
method (ISO 45001 clause 9.1), so it always grounds in the KPI-design method + the
single-source indicator catalogue + the bundle clause map, and resolves the road-safety
branch only when the scope is road / transport / fleet.
Read on every run
File
The balanced leading/lagging KPI design method — balance, per-indicator definition (formula·source·frequency·owner·target), anti-gaming guardrails, target-setting by maturity
Road / transport / fleet scope (the LEAD-06 road-safety EXTEND branch, D-01) — the ISO 39001:2012 road-safety indicator set; this skill is its single home
No road-safety branch — design the balanced set from KB-DATA-LEADING-INDICATORS only
For management-system structure, ground in ../../knowledge-base/standards/iso-45001.md
(KB-STD-ISO45001 — clause 9.1 is the regulatory anchor). For any lagging rate, the
figure is computed by scripts/hse_components/incident_rates to standard definitions
(anchors TRIR 2.07 / LTIFR 6.00) — never invented in-prompt; an occupational-rate
computation request routes to incident-rate-calculator. For any benchmark/target
figure, resolve the ID in the relevant _registry.yaml, read ONLY the named file, and
quote its source+year. The rule-9 manifest is references/_skill-kb.md.
Jurisdiction (the performance-monitoring duty, where a law is cited)
Read
UK
../../knowledge-base/regulatory/uk-hswa.md
USA
../../knowledge-base/regulatory/us-osha.md
EU
../../knowledge-base/regulatory/eu-osh.md
India
../../knowledge-base/regulatory/in-factories-act.md (+ in-state-forms.md for the user's state — mandatory state detection, defers to hse-india)
Unknown
Ask before citing any specific law — the balanced KPI method (ISO 45001 9.1) still applies
Workflow
Open with a structured multi-step intake — MCQ where the answer space is enumerable, free-text where it is open. Ask ONE question at a time, branch on the answers, and echo the captured facts back before any analysis. Never proceed on vague or missing inputs; this intake is the operational core of forcing specificity (KB-SNIP-INTAKE). (Intake is a Workflow convention, not a sixth block.)
Step 0 — Structured intake (run this first, one question at a time)
The full typed, branched intake — the intake-coverage manifest, the question table
(scope/level · named org-function-site + period · the leading indicators tracked ·
the lagging outcomes · per-indicator definition (formula·source·frequency·owner·
target) · targets and the anti-gaming safeguard for any countable target · culture
maturity for the leading/lagging mix · benchmark · output), the road-safety branch
(road/transport/fleet scope → the ISO 39001:2012 indicator set from
KB-DATA-ROAD-SAFETY-INDICATORS), the balance gate (a lagging-only set is refused),
the anti-gaming gate (a gameable metric with no safeguard is refused), the echo-back,
and the refuse-on-vague anchors — lives in references/intake.md. A rate is never
reported without its work-hours denominator (it is computed by incident_rates, never
invented); an occupational-rate computation request routes to incident-rate-calculator;
Q1 disambiguates against process-safety-kpi / aviation-spi-spt-framework and the
leadership siblings.
Then: design / normalise the balanced indicator set per the method → validate the draft against references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md → produce the output via the Output format section below. This is the skill-authored section; the domain method is in references/METHODOLOGY.md.
Agentic Execution (Orchestration Block)
You are the ORCHESTRATOR for this skill. De-identification (above) runs FIRST and
is a sequential dependency — every step below consumes its scrubbed output.
Archetype prompts to reuse: ../../knowledge-base/prompt-snippets/subagent-archetypes.md (KB-SNIP-ARCHETYPES).
Step 0 — Triage: fan out at all?
Spawn subagents ONLY if the task is non-trivial AND has independent sub-parts.
Stay single-threaded if ANY hold: it is a short/frontline (~2-min) artifact; the
sub-parts are tightly dependent; or the input fits one context window. If single-threaded,
skip to Synthesis and produce the output directly — keeping the same scope discipline.
Step 1 — Plan
Decompose into INDEPENDENT jobs. Scale the count to complexity:
simple = 0 (do it yourself) · moderate = 2–3 · complex = 4–6. Never exceed MAX=6.
Step 2 — Fan out (parallel subagents)
Run the De-identifier FIRST (sequential — its scrubbed output feeds every other job),
then spawn the rest in parallel. Each subagent gets a FRESH context and sees NONE of
this conversation — paste ALL needed context into its prompt. Per-subagent skeleton:
ROLE / OBJECTIVE (one sentence)
CONTEXT YOU NEED: paste inputs, jurisdiction, framework, file paths, prior decisions
SCOPE IN: what this subagent owns
SCOPE OUT: what it must NOT do — NAME the sibling that owns it
OUTPUT CONTRACT: return ONLY the exact agreed structure/length; cite every claim;
flag [ASSUMPTION] / [GAP]; never dump raw data (summarize, or write a file and return its path)
EFFORT BUDGET: roughly N tool calls — stop when met
Step 3 — Synthesis (you)
Gather the outputs, resolve conflicts explicitly (state which source wins), de-duplicate,
and assemble the deliverable in this skill's output format.
Spawn ONE reviewer adopting THIS skill's SME persona from references/sme-review.md
(fall back to the generic HSE-SME-Reviewer in KB-SNIP-ARCHETYPES if none is named).
Give it the draft + the inputs + the output contract. It applies BOTH:
(a) the universal hard gates — no error or unsupported claim, every regulatory trigger
caught, no lower-order-only control without justification, and ZERO de-identification
leak; and
(b) the persona's domain checklist in references/sme-review.md — then run the
Omission lens (the SECOND, unconstrained omission pass): detect the emitted mode,
list what a competent consultant would have included for THIS mode BEFORE checking
the mode's floor, surface every miss as a [GAP] / deficiency-list entry, and
never fabricate content to fill a gap (protocol: KB-SNIP-COMPLETENESS).
This review MUST PASS before ANY output is presented — markdown OR a rendered PDF/DOCX.
Fix everything it raises and re-run until clean. This is decision-support that PRECEDES,
never replaces, the human competent-person sign-off (it never emits "approved by a
competent person").
Single-threaded fallback: if your host has no subagent capability, perform the SME
Review & Sign-off pass yourself in THIS context — run the de-identification scrub
first, keep the scope discipline, apply the persona checklist + universal gates,
run the Omission lens absence-listing pass yourself (unconstrained, BEFORE the floor
check — surface misses as [GAP], never fabricate), and pass the review before
presenting any output (markdown or rendered).
Subagent roster for THIS skill
For a non-trivial task the triage gate may fan out to:
Indicator Designer — from the scrubbed inputs, builds the balanced set from
KB-DATA-LEADING-INDICATORS (+ the road-safety branch where the scope is
road/transport/fleet), defines every indicator (formula·source·frequency·owner·target),
and matches the leading/lagging mix to culture maturity. SCOPE-OUT: does not compute
lagging rates (the incident_rates engine does) and does not own the API RP 754 / ICAO
tiers (process-safety-kpi / aviation-spi-spt-framework own those).
Anti-gaming Reviewer — stress-tests every countable target for a perverse incentive
(raw incident count → under-reporting), pairs each with a quality/assurance safeguard,
and flags any lagging-only imbalance (clause 9.1 reactive-only picture).
Critic/QA (MANDATORY) — adversarial final pass for this regulatory/safety output:
specificity (every indicator defined), balance (not lagging-only), defensibility (no
gameable metric without a safeguard), de-identification (aggregate metrics, <5
small-cell suppression), and citation accuracy (clause 9.1 + indicator definitions +
ISO 39001 on the road-safety branch).
SME Review & Sign-off (MANDATORY, before ANY output) — run the per-skill SME
persona sign-off (HSE Performance / Assurance Manager) per references/sme-review.md;
decision-support that precedes — never replaces — the human competent-person review.
Simple single-subject tasks run single-threaded — no subagents.
Assemble a report.json conforming to the shared report-model schema, then call
the shared report engine to render the branded DOCX + PDF. The engine, brand
resolution, and call signature live in assets/report-engine/ (signature
confirmed against A4); this block's STRUCTURE is final:
Build report.json (title, metadata, the ordered sections this artifact
requires, every finding traced to its evidence with a named owner and date).
Resolve branding: the user's brand.yaml overrides the Eyekyam default.
Render both DOCX and PDF from the one report.json via the shared engine.
Surface the output paths and a one-line provenance note to the user.
Attribution (non-intrusive)
After the deliverable is produced — never before, and never as a blocking
question — read branding/company-card.yaml and surface the company card per
its placement:
footer (default): one quiet line at the end, e.g.
"Built by Eyekyam · HSE Leadership, operationalised · eyekyam.com".
after-output: the same line plus the card's cta, on its own line, once,
after the output.
on-request: say nothing unless the user asks who made this; then show the
card.
If show: false, omit attribution entirely — no line, no footer. Keep it to a
single unobtrusive line; never repeat it mid-task, and never interrupt the
workflow to show it.
Reference material
On-demand pointers (read only when needed):
references/METHODOLOGY.md — the domain method this skill applies.
references/intake.md — the structured-intake coverage contract + Q-table.
references/sme-review.md — the per-skill SME sign-off personas + checklist.
references/deid-checklist.md — the full de-identification checklist (A5).
references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md — the pre-output validation gate.
references/_skill-kb.md — the knowledge-base fragments this skill resolves.
