Skip to main content

azsdk-common-eval-authoring-workflow

Author and validate multi-tool, multi-turn, mock, and live Vally scenarios under evals/workflows. WHEN: "write a workflow eval", "add end-to-end eval", "test tool sequence", "create multi-turn eval", "add mock workflow scenario", "add live eval". DO NOT USE FOR: per-skill routing/capability evals (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-skill), isolated prompt-to-tool tests (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-tool).

소스 정보

저장소
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 23일 03:41
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
5,587
포크
3,348

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
azsdk-common-eval-authoring-workflow
description
Author and validate multi-tool, multi-turn, mock, and live Vally scenarios under evals/workflows. WHEN: "write a workflow eval", "add end-to-end eval", "test tool sequence", "create multi-turn eval", "add mock workflow scenario", "add live eval". DO NOT USE FOR: per-skill routing/capability evals (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-skill), isolated prompt-to-tool tests (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-tool).
license
MIT
metadata
{"author":"Microsoft","version":"1.0.0","distribution":"shared"}
compatibility
copilot-chat, @microsoft/vally-cli 0.7.0
# Workflow Eval Authoring Author Vally evals that verify **multi-skill, multi-tool, or multi-turn** orchestration, state, and outcomes across an entire agent conversation, under `evals/workflows/`. All the actual guidance — naming convention, placement, per-category requirements, glossary, grading patterns, grader catalog, anti-patterns, and worked examples — lives in one shared place so it never drifts across the three eval-authoring skills: the eval authoring guide at `eng/common/knowledge/eval-authoring/README.md`. This skill exists to route you there with workflow-eval context already loaded, not to duplicate it. ## Triggers USE FOR: write a workflow eval, add end-to-end eval, test tool sequence, create multi-turn eval, add mock workflow scenario, add live eval WHEN: "write a workflow eval", "add end-to-end eval", "test tool sequence", "create multi-turn eval", "add mock workflow scenario", "add live eval" DO NOT USE FOR: per-skill routing/capability evals (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-skill), isolated prompt-to-tool tests (use azsdk-common-eval-authoring-tool) ## Steps 1. Read the eval authoring guide (`eng/common/knowledge/eval-authoring/README.md`) Step 0 to find this repo's `vallyRoot`/`evalGlobs` for the workflow tier, then the guide's "Workflow" column throughout (naming, requirements, worked example). 2. Use `evals/workflows/mock/` by default. Choose `live/` only when the behavior cannot be represented by the mock MCP; document writes, authentication, cleanup, and nightly-only execution. 3. Model one user goal per stimulus. Use `turns` only when conversation state matters; otherwise keep a single prompt. Mount every candidate skill explicitly, provide minimal file/git fixtures, and bound turns, tokens, workers, and timeout. 4. Combine process and outcome graders per the guide's four-layer pattern and grader catalog: required/disallowed skills and tools, ordering where essential, files/commands, response quality. Avoid overfitting to incidental call sequences and the guide's anti-patterns (e.g. boundary anti-triggers with no competing skill mounted). 5. Scope graders to `turn` only when that turn owns the assertion unambiguously; otherwise grade the full conversation. 6. Validate locally per the guide's "Running evals locally" section, building the matching MCP and priming git fixtures when required. Do not finish or open a PR until it passes; inspect every turn and tool call on failure. ## Rules - Keep mock workflows hermetic and repeatable; use fake IDs and canned responses. - Never run a live write scenario without the documented test area and safety environment. - Preserve relative path invariants for `environment.skills`, `files`, and `git.source`. - Use weights summing to `1.0` and a meaningful threshold when combining grader types. ## References - Eval authoring guide: `eng/common/knowledge/eval-authoring/README.md` — naming, placement, requirements, glossary, graders, anti-patterns, worked examples, local commands. Shared with `azsdk-common-eval-authoring-skill`/`azsdk-common-eval-authoring-tool` — update it there, not per-skill. - Repository-local eval README/configuration discovered in Step 0 (if present)
GitHub에서 보기